creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Terence Jeffrey
Terence Jeffrey
15 Feb 2012
Can Obama Order Grocers to Give Away Bread?

In October 2009, I published a column titled, "Can Obama and Congress Order You to Buy Broccoli?" … Read More.

8 Feb 2012
Did Mass. Constitution Authorize Romney to Mandate Health Insurance?

You can now divide Americans into two groups: Those who believe government rightfully has the power to force … Read More.

1 Feb 2012
Romney Told Catholic Hospitals to Administer Abortion Pills

A defining moment in Mitt Romney's post-pro-life-conversion political career came in his third year as … Read More.

Government Guaranteed

Share Comment

Look over old news reports about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and you will repeatedly read that these two corporations were believed to carry an "implicit guarantee" from Uncle Sam.

That would apparently make them distinct from Social Security and Medicare, which most Americans assume carry an explicit guarantee from Uncle Sam.

"Though Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac say the federal government doesn't guarantee them against failing, Wall Street generally interprets the two companies' congressional charter — and the $2.25 billion line to the Treasury each has — as an implicit guarantee by taxpayers," The Washington Post reported in 1999, for example.

Now, the Bush administration has proposed a Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bailout that will convert this "implicit guarantee" to an explicit one, putting taxpayers potentially on the hook for unknown billions. Even before this bailout, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac enjoyed special benefits from the taxpayers. In addition to their lines of credit at the U.S. Treasury, for example, they were also exempt from state and federal taxes.

The proposed bailout will give the federal government the authority to buy stock in the companies and to increase the easy federal credit extended to them.

The bailout is needed, it is argued, because Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have used their government-favored position to dominate America's secondary mortgage market. "Together, the two companies touch more than half of the nation's $12 trillion in mortgages by either owning them or backing them," The New York Times reported.

The collateral economic damage caused by their failure would be too great. We have no choice but to save them, it is argued.

How did we get to this place? It is part of a cultural and political transformation that is changing the meaning of the American Dream.

Our federal government was chartered to have strictly limited authority, primarily aimed at defending our liberty. It was designed to protect us from foreign enemies and to preserve our God-given rights.

This vision of Uncle Sam generally remained intact into the early part of the 20th century.

Since President Roosevelt's "New Deal" of the 1930s, however, American politicians have increasingly embraced a new vision.

More and more, Uncle Sam's role was not just to protect our rights but also to guarantee us certain material benefits.

Fannie Mae itself was started as a New Deal government agency (privatized in the 1960s) that was intended to make it easier for people to buy homes. By buying up mortgages from banks, it allowed banks to issue more mortgages. By subsidizing lenders, it subsidized home ownership.

In a similar, but more dramatic way, Congress moved at about the same time to subsidize the retirement of seniors by creating the Social Security system.

In the 1960s, Congress created the Medicare program to subsidize health care for seniors.

In this decade, Congress created a Medicare drug entitlement to subsidize prescription medicines for seniors.

In the process, Americans became increasingly dependent on Uncle Sam. This was a good thing for federal elected officials: They could take wealth from one group (tomorrow's taxpayers) and give it to another group (today's voters).

But it also created two great problems: The bills for these benefits were bound to come due eventually, and a people dependent on government are by definition not an independent people.

The real American dream is not found in having a government that helps you pay for your home, your health care and your retirement. It is found in taking care of those things yourself, as a free and independent person.

The next generation will find this dream harder to achieve because of this generation's profligate dependence on an improvident Uncle Sam.

If Uncle Sam literally paid off every mortgage in America — even those Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have no involvement in — it would cost taxpayers $12 trillion. That is a mind-boggling sum. But it is far less than the $53 trillion in unfunded liabilities the Government Accountability Office now says Uncle Sam has guaranteed to make good on in the form of Social Security, Medicare and other federal entitlements.

Terence P. Jeffrey is the editor in chief of CSNnews.com. To find out more about him, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

0 Comments | Post Comment
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Terence Jeffrey
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 15 Feb 2012

4 Jun 2008 Our Own Oil Cartel

28 Nov 2007 Married to Government

12 Sep 2007 The Politicians Losing Iraq