creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Suzanne Fields
Suzanne Fields
17 Oct 2014
A Different Gun Fight at Gender Gap in the 'War on Women'

The Democratic "war on women" has fallen into a time warp, and it's losing traction. Women don't want to be … Read More.

10 Oct 2014
Gone Is the Girl Who Can't Say 'No'

Gay blades, weary of the indulgent life of easy gratification, want the courts to guarantee their right to marry.… Read More.

3 Oct 2014
God, Woman and Free Speech at Yale

Airliners that routinely complete their flights, like a dog that bites a man, naturally get no headlines. A … Read More.

Sending a Woman for a Man's Work

Comment

Some of our women in the military are new American heroines, having served with both sacrifice and distinction. We owe them all a debt we can never fully repay. But some of them are victims of military bureaucrats and high-ranking policy-makers who are blind to the values of our culture and deaf to the ancient call of history.

Our grandparents would have treated as a bad joke the idea that mothers of small children could be soldiers and sailors. The idea that some of them would go to war "in a family way" would have been beyond understanding. But one Navy ship became famous as "the Love Boat" when one in 10 members of the crew reported to sick call pregnant.

But with the passage of time, the unthinkable becomes the convenient, and the Army this month discharged as unfit a young woman who refused to deploy to Afghanistan because she couldn't find someone to care for her 10-month-old son.

The Army wanted to court-martial her but lost its nerve and made a humiliating retreat when Spc. Alexis Hutchinson's story became public. Shame can embarrass the mightiest warrior.

The Army first said she had plenty of time to make arrangements for her son, Kamani, but didn't, and therefore she was subject to military trial and punishment. Then the issue was magically resolved: "The soldier will not be tried by court-martial and therefore is not at risk of receiving a federal conviction," an Army spokesman said. She will be "busted" to her lowest enlisted rank, and may lose other Army and veterans' benefits. But 10-month-old Kamani will keep his mother.

She would have been charged under military Form D-A 53-05 (bureaucrats in and out of the Army love to talk this way). All soldiers are required to sign this statement that "a family care plan" has been put in place. Her lawyer said she informed the Army that her family-care plan had "fallen through" and there was no one to take care of her son and she was afraid she would lose him to a foster parent. Tough, the Army said.

No doubt. The Army is entitled to expect that its soldiers obey orders and regulations, but Hutchinson should never have been put in the position of choosing between the Army way and a mother's first obligation to her child's welfare.

Any nation's army earns its unique place in respect and affection by protecting home and hearth. It can't do that when it attempts to take home and hearth to battle.

Since the attacks on New York and Washington on Sept. 11, 2001, the Center for Military Readiness counts more than 120 women who have died in Afghanistan, Iraq and Kuwait, many of them in plane or helicopter crashes and explosions of the roadside devices that make sudden death the companion of everyone who travels the roads of those benighted places. This compares to 16 women slain in the Vietnam War, mostly nurses, and only six were killed in the first Gulf War, most of them by scud missiles.

The Army is reluctant to recognize the women killed in the Middle East, not wanting to call attention to the oft-gruesome deaths of women who are not supposed to be at risk of death in combat. Congress made the rules, but the Army has found ways to tell Congress to mind its own business.

This suits Congress just fine. A senator or a congressman doesn't want to get caught in a crossfire between public opinion and feminists and their allies who, personally, don't want any part of the Army, in or out of combat. The Senate Armed Services Committee last took testimony on the subject 18 years ago — it didn't even have time to listen in 1992 when it heard from the Presidential Commission on the Assignment of Women in the Armed Forces, which recommended that most, but not all, combat exemptions be retained. The last time a House committee heard testimony on the subject was 30 years ago.

The Pentagon, eager to tap new sources of recruits, couldn't resist taking what appeared to be congressional indifference as a wink and a nudge to do as it pleased. Both George W. Bush and Barack Obama have kept hands off. The Army drew a convenient loophole by redefining missions. A case in point was the deployment of the 1st Battalion, 293rd Infantry of the Indiana National Guard last year with 39 female soldiers. We can expect these women to do their duty, as women in the military always have, but when men send women to war the country has lost something very precious.

Suzanne Fields is a columnist with The Washington Times. Write to her at: sfields1000@aol.com. To find out more about Suzanne Fields and read her past columns, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM



Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
This woman was not put into the position of defending her country or raising her child. She put herself there. She had the option of leaving the army when here son was born, but wanted the paycheck and benefits that go with making the commitment to serve, but then bailed when she was called on to fulfill the commitment. She should have been court-martialed, but since that didn't happen, then at the very least, she should remain ineligible for veteran benefits. She isn't a veteran...she's a fraud.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Shirl
Fri Jan 28, 2011 10:52 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Suzanne Fields
Oct. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Patrick Buchanan
Pat BuchananUpdated 24 Oct 2014
Ray Hanania
Ray HananiaUpdated 23 Oct 2014
Froma Harrop
Froma HarropUpdated 23 Oct 2014

6 Dec 2013 Now You Can't Trust Anyone Over 60

3 Oct 2008 The Curtain on the Last Act

8 Feb 2013 Forbidden Advice for Plain Jane in Combat