creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Susan Estrich
25 May 2012
The Next Education President

Mitt Romney is right about one thing: Too many American children do receive what he this week called a … Read More.

23 May 2012
Susan Mary Riley, We Will Miss You

It's her voice that I keep hearing in my head. "Susan," she would say, in that quiet, commanding … Read More.

18 May 2012
Boring

When my kids were young, about the worst thing they could say about something was that it was capital-b BORRRING.… Read More.

What Should Happen in Nevada

Share Comment

Harry Reid should win.

I'm not talking about whether he deserves to win, although I think he does. He did exactly what the majority leader is supposed to do: deliver for his president. He did it with little help from the other side, with a president on a downhill slide in the polls, with unemployment in his own state of Nevada hitting records. He did not head for the hills and away from his president to save his seat. He did his best to use his power and position to help the people of his state.

I'm not talking about whether people have reason to vote against him. Surely, they do. In an anti-incumbent year, in economic hard times, you couldn't pick a worse person to be than the senior senator and majority leader. With an unemployment rate of more than 14 percent in Nevada, are you actually going to convince people that things could be much worse? I think they are almost certainly angry enough. And who better to be angry at than someone who's been in Congress for as long as Reid?

I'm not talking about who has luck on their side, much less anything more significant than that. Sharron Angle, Reid's Republican opponent, may not be an obvious choice for the deliberative body the Senate is supposed to be. But anyone who's spent time in Washington knows that the Senate is certainly nothing resembling the deliberative body of high-school civics. Angle might not be the smartest person in the building, but she won't be the dumbest, either. Plenty of room, as former Sen. Roman Hruska so famously suggested should apply to the Supreme Court, for the mediocre.

The reason Reid should win has nothing to do with national tides or the enthusiasm gap. It has to do with the first rule of politics. The first rule of politics is that politics is not the first rule.

People vote for all kinds of reasons that almost never turn on politics, per se, or even on politicians. People vote for reasons that almost always have to do with themselves and how they are doing. Politicians who forget this are, by definition, out of touch, and it usually shows.

What is happening in Nevada right now is not only that people are angry, but also that they are hurting. When one out of six people is out of work (and it's close to that in Nevada), it means that literally everyone has a family member or friend or neighbor who is unemployed. The housing market collapse in Las Vegas is among the worst in the nation. Everyone who thought they were so smart for investing in Vegas real estate is not smart anymore.

You could spend a lot of time yelling back and forth about who is to blame for all of this. Should we finger the officials who deregulated the markets? The financial institutions that provided risky mortgages? The others that packaged them or rated them? The people who bought them? All of the above?

It won't get you anywhere at all. You can debate about who is going to fix it or who should, but at the end of the day, we all know that the government is going to be part of the "answer," whether or not it's one you support.

That is why Reid should win.

It may not be fair, and it's certainly not her fault, but Reid can do a lot more for the people of Nevada at a time when they need all the help they can get.

He can do that because, if he's re-elected, the president will owe him. He will still be his party's leader, and he can bring home more to the state of Nevada than a goof-prone newcomer with a penchant for putting her foot in her mouth — who would be one of the most junior members of the Republican Party.

At the end of the day, Nevada may not want Reid, but they can hardly afford to get rid of him. And that might be enough this year.

To find out more about Susan Estrich and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

12 Comments | Post Comment
If the election is decided on the criterion which candidate will be the most powerful senator, then by any reasonable account Senator Reid should be re-elected. There are a few problems, however, which supersede the 'most powerful' criterion.

Senator Reid used his power and prestige to 'deliver' for President Obama and the very-left-wing (not *moderately* left wing) constituencies of the Democratic Party. This, in very considerable parts, violated the trust and commission invested in him by the people of Nevada. I don't vote in Nevada, but it sure looks like many many Nevada voters are willing to take a chance on a newbie senator who is 'after their own heart' than stick with a seasoned pro who has lost touch with many or most of the people of Nevada.

This latest essay is a bit of a rehash of Ms. Estrich's recent 'experienced plumber or inexperienced plumber' essays. Once again, the choice is not limited to the issue of experience (or power).

-- Bob Elkind
Comment: #1
Posted by: bob elkind
Tue Oct 26, 2010 6:24 PM
Susan, Your comment about Sharron Angle that " the Senate is certainly nothing resembling the deliberative body of high-school civics" is so snarky that I'm tempted to say it's beneath you. But you now appear as irrational about conservative women as Mo Dowd. But more importantly, if you don't get why Harry Reid's time and tenure as majority leader is long past, then you should stop writing. This essay frankly borders on irrelevant.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Lesley Barnard
Tue Oct 26, 2010 10:51 PM
But the challenge before us is to reverse the disastrous, job killing policies of the Obama administation and the Democrats in Congress. Returning Harry Reid to the Senate only means one more vote for continued damage to our economy. While Angle will be a less experienced Senator, she will support the policies we need to recover from the Obama Depression.

When historians look back on the Obama presidency, I believe they will conclude it was the expectation of his election and the policies he would pursue that caused the economy to slow in advance of his election. The prospect of higher taxes and unknown, but certainly higher costs due to new policies convinced individuals and businesses to stop spending and wait to see what happened.
Comment: #3
Posted by: pb1222
Wed Oct 27, 2010 5:04 AM
Susan Estrich - the newly proclaimed supporter of Marxism! This lady is no moderate Democrat. She now openly states she favors Socialist/Facist/Marxist policies.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Early
Wed Oct 27, 2010 6:09 AM
Why would ANYONE be voluntarily dumb enough to want to vote to re-elect any politician who'd helped put the country in the mess it's in?
Comment: #5
Posted by: Pat Riley
Wed Oct 27, 2010 6:46 AM
I am getting real close to not reading you anymore. I used to like to listen to get the other view but now it's totally political for you. Sure Harry Reid got it through with no help from the other side. He and the super majority crammed things down the throats of the American people. I believe we call that partisan. Vote Harry and the rest of the arrogant, thoughtless politicians out.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Lynn
Wed Oct 27, 2010 7:04 AM
Harry Reid is so hated in Nevada that half of the voting population is willing to tell a pollster they are willing to vote for the complete idiot Sharon Angle. THAT'S how much Reid is hated in his home State.
Comment: #7
Posted by: paul graham
Wed Oct 27, 2010 7:20 AM
Susan, your column today is a disappointment. Harry Reid should be reelected by Nevada because he's got the ability to deliver more of what people say they don't want? How does that compute logically? This was not one of your better efforts.
Comment: #8
Posted by: Mike Myers
Wed Oct 27, 2010 9:15 AM
Yah, Ms. Estrich! We don't like what we he's done, but we should re-elect him 'cuz he's soooooooo good at doing it!

That's the sort of reasoning which deserves a snort!

-- Bob Elkind
Comment: #9
Posted by: bob elkind
Wed Oct 27, 2010 2:03 PM
"Nevada Can't Afford to Get Rid of Reid"
Yes sir, susan, sir! Since your intellectual majesty is smarter than Nevadans about whether they can 'afford to get rid of Reid', i will personally make sure that the Nevadans get your decree on this one, sir.

majority leader's job is to deliver to his president? *his* president? regardless of what the president is asking for? Is harry a child? And did he not decide for himself how he is going to destroy america? You think he needs Obama's demands to do what he did in the Senate? If you can read the english langauge at least as well as you can somehow write, you might want to read the Constitution. It might instruct you in the basic job of a senator. (not that you give a dang). What kind of incompetent nincompoops are getting *paid* to write drivel for the Leftist media. Boy, i wish i was a communist.
Comment: #10
Posted by: SECREV
Wed Oct 27, 2010 4:18 PM
Susan,

Being from Nevada and having voted both for and against Reid in past elections, I feel qualified to tell you - your article is a crock. In the past, with the exception of John Ensign, the Republicans have had candidates that make Angle look like McCain. Those bozos never had a chance, and didn't deserve it. This year, the Democratic ad campaign in the Republican primary was designed to marginalize and defeat Sue Lowden, who was polling way, way ahead of Reid. The Reid camp succeeded in facing the least qualified candidate out of the primary (at least not Aaron Russo this time). And guess what - we still don't want him. He quit representing Nevada about 8 years ago when he was elevated to Senate Minority Leader. We were 50 out of 50 in benefit from the Stimulus funds received (an ill-conceived program) and like the Stimulus or not, Reid didn't even help Nevada. He helped all sorts of states with special exceptions in the Healthcare bill, nothing for Nevada?

The Conservatives hated those bills, but as Majority Leader, if he was pushing bad legislation, couldn't he at least have helped his constituents? He delivered for "his" President, but against those that he is supposed to represent. And in a representative government (we are not a dictatorship yet), if you don't represent, you go home.

Harry - Come Home.
Comment: #11
Posted by: lvtaxman
Wed Oct 27, 2010 4:55 PM
Suzie, Suzie you have gone around the bend.
Comment: #12
Posted by: Paul
Thu Oct 28, 2010 1:18 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Susan Estrich
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

19 Oct 2011 Age Discrimination

28 Apr 2010 Playing With Financial Fire

7 Aug 2009 Chief Bratton