The gas line was cut at the house of one congressman's brother after his address was posted online as a way to send a message to the congressman about his vote for health care reform. A coffin was left on another's front lawn. A number of House Democrats have requested increased police protection. Protesters are reportedly planning to picket the Senate parliamentarian's home. Someone took a shot at the Richmond, Va., office of House Minority Whip Eric Cantor.
A new Harris poll shows that as many as one in four Republicans believe that Barack Obama is the Antichrist.
Meanwhile, so-called leaders of the two parties are using the occasion to blame each other. Cantor has accused Democrats of "dangerously fanning the flames." House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn accused Republican lawmakers of sending "signals" that amount to aiding and abetting the violence.
Enough.
Obama is our president, the president of the United States.
What is at stake is far more important than health care reform, important as that is.
In a democracy, you take your lumps. Majority rules. If you don't like what the president and Congress are doing, vote against them. Ditto if you don't like what the opposition is doing. Get involved in politics. Run for office.
Many of us did not like George Bush's decision to invade Iraq. We thought it was wrong. But I never hated Bush, and I repeatedly criticized those who said they did. As a young aide to Sen. Ted Kennedy, I fought hard against the Reagan Revolution. But in the years since, I have repeatedly visited the Reagan Library out of respect for the man and for the office of the presidency.
Bush was wrong, but he wasn't evil.
Same for Reagan. Obama may be right or wrong, but he loves this country. I have no doubt that he and all the members of Congress are doing what they think is best for this country.
Those who threaten them — on either side — are tearing at the fabric that binds us together. The idea of picketing the parliamentarian, of all people, a nonpartisan professional charged with interpreting procedural rules, would be funny if it weren't so frightening. Have we lost our collective conscience? Have we forgotten what really matters?
Passion can be a wonderful thing in politics. I encourage my students to be passionate about politics, and it saddens me, frankly, how many of them are simply "turned off" by all things Washington.
But like most good things, too much passion can be dangerous. Politics requires compromise. In every contest, there are winners and losers, and knowing how to be good at both is essential to a stable democracy.
I understand that there are many people who really do believe that Obama is taking the country in the wrong direction. They have no doubt. They are as sure of this as they are of their religious beliefs. But that sort of faith can be way, way too powerful to contain in a system in which you lose as often as you win.
It is time for our leaders to act like leaders, to stop fighting like schoolchildren about who started it and who is to blame. We — and they — need to tone down the rhetoric.
Someone could get hurt. Keep it up, both sides, and someone will get hurt.
This nation can survive an ill-conceived health care bill, if that's what you think it is; we have survived an ill-conceived war, which is what many of us thought it was. What we cannot survive is partisanship run amok to the point that we start hating each other instead of our real enemies.
To find out more about Susan Estrich and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.
You write, "This nation can survive an ill-conceived health care bill, if that's what you think it is; we have survived an ill-conceived war, which is what many of us thought it was. What we cannot survive is partisanship run amok to the point that we start hating each other instead of our real enemies". Yet, you also write, "A coffin was left on another's front lawn". A group of people had a prayer vigil, on the sidewalk, with reporters present, held the coffin to symbolize the death of infants and elderly because of the health care bill and carried the coffin away with them, never setting foot or coffin on the lawn. How's that toning down the rhetoric, working for you. As for the violent acts, they are commited by isolated whackos or deliberate attempts by the opponants of the Tea Party to discredit and otherwise peaceful, yet, loud group of people. Why are you not taking aim at the brazen attempt to discredit the Tea Party protesters by Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-MO), . The ample video evidence shows hundreds of protestors booing and yelling, "Kill the bill," but nary a racial slur is heard among them. That, of course, did not matter to the mainstream media as typified in the libelous McClatchy newspapers headline, "Tea party protesters scream 'nigger' at black congressman." I am very sad for you.
Comment: #1
Posted by: David Henricks
Thu Mar 25, 2010 10:00 PM
Mr. Henricks, did you actually read the entire article? Ms. Estrich refers at least twice to "both sides" causing the problem. Your comment attempts to blame only one side, presumably the one you oppose. You, sir, are part of the problem.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Doug Collins
Fri Mar 26, 2010 2:34 AM
Is this not a democracy? Did Obama not win by a comfortable MAJORITY last fall? Then what are you referring to Mr Riley? Did The Dems not win control of both houses of Congress? The majority said via vote, (not histrionics) that we wanted change. As Ms Estrich points out, if you don't like that change, vote for someone new NEXT TIME! That is democracy.
Comment: #5
Posted by: cadbury
Fri Mar 26, 2010 5:34 AM
Re: Pat Riley
Wrong. His job, and your congressman's, is to do as he sees fit. That's the concept. That's the way a democratic republic is supposed to work. That's why we don't make laws by referendum.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Janet Swanborn
Fri Mar 26, 2010 6:15 AM
Re: Doug Collins I read the entire! article 4 times, before I composed the post. Saying "both sides" in passing does not legitimize out-right mis-reporting (lies?).
Comment: #7
Posted by: David Henricks
Fri Mar 26, 2010 7:16 AM
Re: Janet Swanborn Did the Constitution of the United States get rewritten or amended to add a new power to the President and Congress to "do as they see fit"? I missed that memo.
Comment: #8
Posted by: David Henricks
Fri Mar 26, 2010 7:23 AM
Threatening politicians you disagree with. Committing threatening acts against the families of politicians you disagree with. For a minute there I thought I was reading about Iraq or Afghanistan, not America.
Comment: #9
Posted by: Michelle Keane
Fri Mar 26, 2010 9:15 AM
Ms. Estrich:
Very shallow article on the Health bill. We can get this from the TV people. It would be nice to find some of the fine print of the bill in our columnist.
C. A. Higgins
308 Spring Valley Court, SW
Hunhtsville, Alabama 35802
256 881-0353
chuck.higgins@Juno.com
Comment: #10
Posted by: C. A. Higgins
Fri Mar 26, 2010 12:03 PM
Yes, Obama is the president. Ronald Reagan was our president and some left wing kook shot him. George Bush had a shoe thrown at his head. JFK was shot. RFK was shot. Martin Luther King was shot.
It seems there will always be this type of violence. The media doesn't help. A story is a story, and whether they get it right or not (re: the coffin) it's cash in their pocket and more ratings.
As David Hendricks point out, there was never a racial slur at the president from any tea party people. These people are worried about the debt, deficit, and the murder of millions of little babies.
I think this country has never seen such a mess.
Concerning your statement: "Obama may be right or wrong but he loves this country." I couldn't disagree with you more. He has shown nothing but contempt for this country.
Seems to me Susan that no one brothered to write an article like this while the far left and liberal crowd was attacking G.W. Bush calling him Hitler, posting pictures of him as Hitler and all types shouting to Kill Him. I guess it depends on which side of the aisle one sits. Thank goodness I sit in the middle and watch them both. It is the first time in history that a President has gone against the American people according to all the polls from every side. Now that our GDP will pay 84% out in 2020 to cover the debt level raised by this president it does not look too good for the future of America.
Since the Democrats have passed this bill, I suggest let the Democrats find a way to pay for it because the days of entitlement for doing nothing is going to bring down the country.
"People should not engage in personal threats. I'm happy to condemn any effort to engage in personal threats. But I think the Democratic leadership has to take some real responsibility for having run a machine that used corrupt tactics that bought votes that bullied people, and as a result has enraged much of the American people." Newt Gingrich
Comment: #14
Posted by: Kathaleen
Sat Mar 27, 2010 8:30 AM
The objections, the anger, from both sides can be understood, even supported as long as its peaceful. However, in a civil society threats, or actual violent acts should in no way be condoned. The real point under this story is the complete contempt the left and OBomber have for and have demonstrated against our democracy. The methods they used to get it done at any cost completely ignored the will of the vast number of American people as proven by poll after poll after poll. This issue was a more far left, radical, agenda, ideology than concern for the common welfare of American's. The Radical Obomber supporters will apparently do everything in their power to change the system without working within the system. Just see the book Rules for Radicals and it becomes clear. OBomber recently said it himself, "This is what CHANGE looks like." This is NOT what American or our Democracy looks like Mr President. This what happens in Third World Banana Republics. I have tremendous respect for the Office of the Presidency. I have absoultely NONE for you and what you represent.
Comment: #15
Posted by: Joe
Sat Mar 27, 2010 1:12 PM
I'm sorry Susan... I am looking for your anti-war article that says "George Bush may be right or wrong, but he loves this country. I have no doubt that he and all the members of Congress are doing what they think is best for this country." I agree with you that we need to be civil in this country -- win or lose. I am disappointed that these laments only come out when the lack of civility is against your side. Do you remember the Democratic effort to try all Republicans as war criminals? Where were you then?
Comment: #16
Posted by: scott365
Sat Mar 27, 2010 3:20 PM
I just read something by a better writer (than myself). Here is a more detailed version of what I was trying to say in comment #16. http://article.nationalreview.com/429317/the-definition-of-freakout/jonah-goldberg?page=1
Comment: #17
Posted by: scott365
Sat Mar 27, 2010 4:05 PM
An observation and a question: (1) I tried to finds articles (in the plural) written by you protesting the activities of union thugs quieting the free speech of those not in agreement with the liberal agenda (occasionally by force) and was not able to find ANY; and, (2) if this wasn't political theater by the liberals, why did the White House sent out a fund raising plea using this topic (within 24 hours of this "breaking" news - otherwise known as the Democrat talking points)?
Comment: #18
Posted by: JohnnySunshine
Sun Mar 28, 2010 6:34 AM
Dear Susan Estrich
Why do the people who voice their opinion for moral turpitude be denounced and why should that activism for moral integrity not be directed at anyone in leadership position, regardless of party affiliation?
Is it fair on moral grounds or any other grounds to force people to do things against their religious beliefs when this country was founded on the principle of religious freedom?
If human worth is based on a financial value, what reason is there to maintain human life beyond the need to have provided customers for business and tax payers for bigger government?
Do each of us who ask ourselves, why am I here?, have to answer, "For the greater glory of the government, of course?
I listen very carefully to your opinions and rational arguments and always come away with a feeling of listening to a beautiful concert and left only wit the memories of the sour notes.
You're a good woman Susan, but you really need to get better.
Chet
FYI. Susan,
When a deer hunter fires a single round at a deer and misses, he does not go home empty handed, he reloads. It's not always sport. It may be survival to bring home the game.
Don't insult us by turning this metaphor into a dangerous threat to the life of some misguided politician.
Comment: #19
Posted by: Chester J Malinowski
Sun Mar 28, 2010 9:06 AM
Joe Fitzgerald, one of the Boston Herald's top columnists, wrote a column yesterday (3/27) titled "President Obama
Cares Little for The People." Given the current threatening political atmosphere, It will only serve to incite physical violence against the President. Fitzgerald should have known better.
Comment: #20
Posted by: mjayr1
Sun Mar 28, 2010 12:42 PM
Susan just keeps moving farther and farther left. She is an elitist who will survive very well in the new Obama styled totalitarian government. And Cadbury, America was not a Democracy, it use to be a Democratic Republic. Check it out.
Cuba is a Democracy (One party or no party form of government where citizens have no say). If you're not an elitist you are scum.
Comment: #21
Posted by: Early
Mon Mar 29, 2010 6:13 AM
America is not a democracy. It is a constitutional republic.
There will always be those who hate politicians. There was plenty of hate going around on the Left when Bush was in office. In fact, they continue trying to fan that hatred so they won't have to take any responsibility for what they are doing wrong.
Obama does NOT love this country. His policies are financially ruinous. He has utter disdain for the Constitution and for the people, both of which he considers impediments to his agenda.
"This nation can survive an ill-conceived health care bill". A clearer example of leftist drivel and disregard of reality would be difficult to find. The left believes that it can do anything it wants and that America will just keep ticking along. Put this "ill-conceived health are bill" uppermost among the policies that Obama has done that is financially ruinous. When they succeed in destroying our economy, they will have succeeded in destroying America. Then what? Oops? Our bad?
Unique among nations, America was born out of rebellion and revolt. Thomas Jefferson, the father of the democrat party, said: The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. He also said that we have the "right" and "duty" to get rid of a government when it "evinces a design to reduce" us "under absolute despotism". People see that happening.
It is the left that is tearing the fabric that binds us. When there is one party, currently in the majority, that is telling the people to sit down and shut up and let them do whatever they want, there is going to be trouble. People can only be pushed so far before they start pushing back.
The sooner the better.
Comment: #22
Posted by: Roxanna
Mon Mar 29, 2010 9:27 AM
Concerning your statement: "Obama may be right or wrong but he loves this country." I couldn't disagree with you more. He has shown nothing but contempt for this country.
Concerning your statement: "Obama may be right or wrong but he loves this country." I couldn't disagree with you more. He has shown nothing but contempt for this country.
Obama hates American, he is bent on destroying it as we know it. Unless the GOP can gain control of at least one house of congress the nation cannot service.
Comment: #25
Posted by: Paul
Mon Mar 29, 2010 6:19 PM
Susan, Do you really truly believe in this administration or are you writing these articles that are really absurd just to keep a paycheck coming? I can not believe that a woman of your intelligence can not see what is happening? I question this of Alan Colmes and Hillary too? Obama has silenced and made Hillary irrelevant and I am sure she has to be angry about that. She looks like a fool out there especially with Israel. In the bible it states Israel will not be destroyed but there is no mention of America. I would love to hear your discussions with Hillary.
Comment: #26
Posted by: Kathaleen
Tue Mar 30, 2010 4:59 AM
I do not understand the comparison of the support for Bush invading Iraq with the support, or lack thereof, for Obama's health care legislation. Bush had broad bipartisan support (297/133 in the House, 77/23 in the Senate), even though when things got tough, Democrats went into hiding. Obama was nominated because he was in the fortunate position of only being a state senator at the time of the vote, so he didn't have to vote on Iraq. The health care legislation, on the other hand, never had bipartisan support, as the Democrats didn't need it or want it. They had a majority in the House and a filibuster proof Senate. They tried to blame Republicans as obstructionists, but the fact is they just couldn't agree amonst themselves. It was only upon Kennedy's death, and the election of Senator Brown, that the Republicans became relevant.
Comment: #28
Posted by: Tom
Tue Mar 30, 2010 7:32 AM
Ms. Estrich I don't now if you are just trying to get publicity for yourself or you are just plain stupid. Obama doesn't give damn about the American people. He and Nancy are simply narsicistic and self serving. Unfortunatly the American people will have to suffer for the idiotic laws they're passing.
Comment: #29
Posted by: Ed
Tue Mar 30, 2010 3:09 PM
I am not an American. I live on the other side of the world, but I like to think I follow international politics closely.
Whatever you may think of the health care legislation, you cannot forget that Obama ran on a policy of comprehensive health care/insurance reform. It was not a secret. The American public voted for him on that basis. If you don't like it, fine - but it is not appropriate in a representative democracy to insist that a party follow the opinion polls blindly. You have elections, and the country makes its choice.
Irrespective of political leanings it is, dare I say, 'unAmerican' to insist that an elected official abandon the platform they ran on and on the basis of which they were elected because of opinion. That would be far more divisive than any individual piece of legislation. Opinion is always divided on important issues and public opinion can change. Your founding fathers decided that the way to resolve this was an election.
From a personally point of view, coming from a country with single payer universal health care - I can say we have a vibrant private insurance market which supplements the government system. Medical professionals often work in both the public and the private system. The system proposed in the new US legislation is so far from a government takeover that it boggles the mind to even consider it, but even if it was, it is nothing to fear. Be wary, yes. Hold your government to account, yes. But don't fear it for its own sake.
Comment: #30
Posted by: Adam R
Wed Mar 31, 2010 7:25 PM