opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Susan Estrich
12 Feb 2016
Why We Do It This Way

Who in the world, one of my friends asked, could ever have come up with such a ridiculous way to nominate a president? … Read More.

10 Feb 2016
Why Women Should Be for Hillary

There is one reason young women should support Hillary Clinton for president. It happens to be, in my … Read More.

5 Feb 2016
Donald Trump: Sore Loser

It was the shortest speech anyone can remember him giving. He was clearly in a state of disbelief. How could … Read More.

What Newt Knows (and Cain Doesn't)


If you take a gander at Newt Gingrich's Wikipedia page, in the personal section, you'll see quite a pile of baggage. Most of us have some. He has more than most: three marriages, messy divorces, affairs, etc. But here's the difference between Gingrich, the experienced politician, and the hopelessly inexperienced Herman Cain. Newt's baggage is all packed up — which is what you're supposed to do with your baggage before you take off on a presidential campaign, not in the middle of it.

None of this is new. Newt's first wife, Jackie Battley, was his high school geometry teacher. He was 19 when they married; she was seven years older. The marriage lasted 18 years, until Newt took up with Marianne Ginther, whom he married in 1981. Back in 1985, Battley told The Washington Post a story that has since become apocryphal: Newt and the children went to visit her in the hospital while she was recovering from surgery for ovarian cancer, and Newt wanted to discuss the divorce. Ouch.

A little worse than Cain's fondling? Except — nota bene — Gingrich cleaned that one up earlier this year. Not only did he dispute the account, but Jackie Gingrich Cushman, one of his two daughters from that marriage, wrote a column for Creators Syndicate (also my syndicate) titled "Setting the Record Straight" in which she insisted that it was not cancer at all, that her mother requested the divorce prior to the hospital stay, and that her father had taken them to the hospital to visit their mother and not to discuss the divorce.

Are you listening, Herman Cain? We call this damage control.

Today, both of the Gingrich daughters work with their dad. One runs Gingrich Communications, and the other is a conservative columnist and commentator who co-authored "5 Principles for a Successful Life" with her dad.

There isn't much about Ginther in Wikipedia, but another website notes that the couple lived apart for some years before he took up with his current wife, Callista Bisek, then a House staffer.

Now this one is messy: There he was, heading the effort to impeach President Bill Clinton for his relationship with an intern while having his own affair with a congressional staffer 23 years his junior. What do you do? You give an interview before your campaign takes off, to a friendly reporter, effectively apologizing.

Or as Newt told David Brody of the Christian Broadcasting Network earlier this year, "There's no question at times in my life, partially driven by how passionately I felt about this country, that I worked far too hard and things happened in my life that were not appropriate."

Now, I'm not sure how sleeping with a staffer relates to passion about this country, but the point is that Newt got it out there and did his mea culpa. He didn't stonewall (Cain's first response); he didn't deny it all (Cain's second response); he didn't send out his lawyer to threaten his accusers (Cain's third response). He put it out, apologized and turned it into old news.

Callista, according to her bio, is a devout Catholic. A devout Catholic married to a guy who's on his third marriage and has had two extramarital affairs? Yep. Turns out Newt converted to Catholicism in 2009: "Over the course of several years, I gradually became Catholic and then decided one day to accept the faith I had already come to embrace." It was "catching a glimpse" of Pope Benedict during his 2008 visit to the United States that did it: "I was struck by the happiness and peacefulness he exuded. The joyful and radiating presence of the Holy Father was a moment of confirmation about the many things I had been thinking and experiencing for several years."

Since becoming a Catholic, he has developed a deeper appreciation of the role of faith in public life. Yes, once again, it was earlier this year that Newt said: "In America, religious belief is being challenged by a cultural elite trying to create a secularized America, in which God is driven out of public life." You hear that, Iowa (where religious conservatives dominate)?

Now that Gingrich is climbing in the polls, all of the marriages and the rest will recirculate in the political press. But unlike Cain's baggage, Gingrich's is old news packaged for public consumption and is therefore far less likely to derail his efforts.

A cynic might say Gingrich has reassembled his life story with the same political skill set that he used to come up with the Contract with America back in 1994, which led to the Republican takeover of the House and his own election as Speaker. That's probably true. But it takes precisely such a political skill set to be a successful presidential candidate.

Sorry, Mr. Cain. 9-9-9 was never going to be enough. And about Libya...

To find out more about Susan Estrich and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at



6 Comments | Post Comment
What did BHO know before being elected? A lot about Maxism!
Comment: #1
Posted by: Early
Wed Nov 16, 2011 4:47 AM
Another hit piece by Estrich transparently in drag as advice to or about Cain. Why pick Gingrich? Why not look to Clinton, to his the bimbo eruption squads, to the alleged right wing conspiracy, to blatent lies in our faces on tv, to wit " I did not have sex with that woman. Miss Lewinski." "it depends what the meaning of is, is" etc etc? Why not look to IRS audits of those women involved, to Carville and his character assination teams, to threats and intimidation? Thats how the Democrats deal with accusers. That the way to package up controversy. Then why not look to the AAP, the Affirmative Action President we have now, to his compulsive lies, to the media cover up of his past, and to his utter lack of acheivement at any stage in his history?

Once again Estrich proves that all Democrats are low lifes.
Comment: #2
Posted by: joseph wright
Wed Nov 16, 2011 5:41 AM
Re: joseph wright

Ms. Estrich nor the so-called 'womens rights group' will never ever attack former president Bill Clinton. To do so would prove the lie they must accept in order to state Bill Clinton was railroaded by conservatives.

The last couple of columns have shown clearly the hypocrite Ms. Estrich is! She doesn't care.

Nuff Said...Dennis
Comment: #3
Posted by: Dennis
Wed Nov 16, 2011 7:28 AM
I'm a flame-breathing conservative wingnut (by Estrich's standards), and I found this column to be both politically agnostic and informative. I don't know what Dennis and joseph wright had for breakfast, but their comments seem wholly disconnected from the column.

Yup, compared to Herman Cain, Gingrich is a seasoned and mature professional. Now, about the matter of Gingrich never leaving any thought unspoken... hopefully Newt has outgrown this temptation.

-- Bob Elkind
Comment: #4
Posted by: bob elkind
Wed Nov 16, 2011 6:20 PM
Susan, I enjoy your columns immensely. They're are some of the few that I read linked over from Drudge. However, the elephant (in the column this time-not the room), is the obvious nudge from the Democrats to pick a GOP candidate. We realize that you don't want the best Republican to go up against Obama. I also know that you know that there are millions of voters that can't name a candidate, but are familiar with Leno, Kimmel, Sirius, Redbull,Gaga, Red Robin, Garmin, TJ Max, etc. Are they going to vote for a History Professor and former Speaker or will they vote for a stage and aircraft steps hopping, GQ carrying, cool man. I admire you for knowing the answer.
Comment: #5
Posted by: thunderclapnewman
Thu Nov 17, 2011 8:13 AM
If Newts "baggage is all packed up" why did you spend so much time un-packing it in this article. Maybe to attempt to make a point, but the only point I got from it is that you had very little to think about that day. I have never read any of your articles that had any positive substance. It is always tearing someone down to try and express your ideas about how the world should be. You have baggage of your own, how about writing about your divorce and tell the world about the skeletons in your closet. The problem with that this country is full of idiots who would enjoy reading about it, and probably be stupind enough to vote for YOU to be President. I mean, look at what happened last election. This country is in deep trouble, but we stick our noses in everyone elses problems and try and help solve them while the world laughs at us and reads the crap you write. I may not vote for Cain or Newt...but you can bet I will not be voting for any Democrat!
Comment: #6
Posted by: Troy
Thu Nov 17, 2011 3:54 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Susan Estrich
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 13 Feb 2016
David Harsanyi
David HarsanyiUpdated 12 Feb 2016
David Limbaugh
David LimbaughUpdated 12 Feb 2016

5 Sep 2008 The Big 5-0

25 Oct 2012 Waitress Moms and Abortion

9 May 2007 Ken Burns' World War II