creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Susan Estrich
25 May 2012
The Next Education President

Mitt Romney is right about one thing: Too many American children do receive what he this week called a … Read More.

23 May 2012
Susan Mary Riley, We Will Miss You

It's her voice that I keep hearing in my head. "Susan," she would say, in that quiet, commanding … Read More.

18 May 2012
Boring

When my kids were young, about the worst thing they could say about something was that it was capital-b BORRRING.… Read More.

The Republican Dwarfs

Share Comment

I must admit that it took me at least a minute to figure out the Drudge _Report headline: "Paw In."

Had there been some gruesome animal attack somewhere, alligators eating little girls' arms in Florida, a train accident in Eastern Europe or something else I could worry about as my children travel to places that are literally beyond my world?

I looked at the picture quickly, and I didn't have a clue. Matt Drudge being tasteful about a grisly animal attack by picturing the zookeeper instead of the animal? Not likely.

It was, of course, Tim Pawlenty, putting some part of himself (presumably greater than a paw) in the 2012 presidential race. I've heard many Republicans sing his praises as governor of Minnesota, and I have no reason to doubt his competence. But to misquote Mario Cuomo, the issue in this race is not competence but ideology — at least on the Republican side.

The candidate who would truly electrify 2012 is Sarah Palin. Like her or hate her, she is way beyond a politician. Snow White to the dwarves, as the Democratic field was referred to in 2007 before Barack Obama (never a dwarf) got in the race.

Here's my guess based on absolutely no inside information. She won't run. She may flirt with it for a while, keeping the press guessing and the cameras flashing, but there's not much talk of her meeting with top fundraisers and trying to lock them up or at least keep them neutral. Palin is making money and drawing crowds of admirers (and also getting paid for that) doing exactly what she wants to do. If she runs, she loses at least two out of three of those things and gains a hostile press corps and all the other candidates shooting at her, to boot. And, being realistic, do you really think she could beat Obama?

Which leaves Mitt Romney as the GOP frontrunner, if for no reason other than that no one can remember who the other potential candidates are.

Right now, Romney looks to be the strongest general election candidate of the group because of his experience with economic issues and his more moderate (Massachusetts) views on social issues. He's not a divisive general election candidate, which makes him a less than ideal candidate in the Republican nomination battle.

The Democrats did it first. The Republicans didn't even know they were doing it until the Christian Coalition had already taken control of the party-nominating apparatus — going to caucuses, voting in primaries, taking the power to pick delegates away from central committees, even as Democrats were attempting to give more power to the insiders. After you lose for a while, pragmatism reasserts itself over ideology.

The nomination process measures different strengths. Even today, with everyone seeing the same news, winning state caucuses and even primaries is a personal exercise. It's more like running for governor every week than it is like running for president. I am proud of the governor I worked for in 1988, and I think he would have been a much better president than he was a presidential candidate. The same may be true of Pawlenty. But getting elected in a national election, which is completely different from the primary process, is a prerequisite to being any kind of president.

Lee Atwater, the late and legendary Republican political operative, used to say there was a little boat with all the people Americans could imagine being president, whether they agreed with them or not. Getting into that boat is a necessary step to winning. Obama is obviously already in that boat, as was Hillary Clinton. The Republican who is closest to the boat is almost surely Romney, but his nomination is anything but certain.

Fun and games to come, and definitely not the Disney sort.

To find out more about Susan Estrich and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM


Comments

11 Comments | Post Comment
Believe me Susan, Republicans/Conservatives/Independents are well aware of the potential candidates for the Republican primary. And that's because we're aware of the importance of the 2012 election just like we were with the 2010 election. My favorites are Herman Cain and Donald Trump (in that order). But if they don't win the primary, I'll fully support whoever does.

Oh, and by the way, Obama has been kicked off the boat. Unless he drastically changes the way he governs (or maybe it's better to say 'rules') his chances at reelection are bleak at best. That's even taking into account the massive voter fraud that will no doubt take place.

Comment: #1
Posted by: E Ortiz
Tue Apr 19, 2011 3:07 PM
eOrtiz---you watch too much television.
Comment: #2
Posted by: N
Tue Apr 19, 2011 9:58 PM
Ever since the election farce of 2000, I've felt like I was living in a near-future political satire. The fact that grotesque figures like Sarah Palin and Donald Trump could ever seriously be considered presidential candidates just reinforces that feeling.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Steven Doyle
Wed Apr 20, 2011 4:19 AM
N - I would agree I probably watch too much of the Golf Channel. But regarding politics, I get my news/political opinion from a variety of sources, including this one, with my primary being the WSJ. I'm not sure why you think I watch too much television...is it because I said Obama 'rules' instead of 'governs? I would say this about any president that broke half as many laws as Obama.

Steven Doyle - I don't agree with everything Sarah Palin or Trump has said, but I'm not sure why you would consider them 'grotesque'? More grotesque than John Edwards? Are they more grotesque than Obama because they can't read a teleprompter as well as he does?
Comment: #4
Posted by: E Ortiz
Wed Apr 20, 2011 10:10 AM
And the thrust of this column is precisely what? Other than it is simply the brain droppings bilge of a liberal faced with a deadline to produce something in print it serves zero purpose . Susan says " I am proud of the governor I worked for in 1988, and I think he would have been a much better president than he was a presidential candidate" Clearly the reverse is true of the jackass occupying the Oval office today. Aided by an incompetent campaign by Clinton (whose rank incompetence has continued in her present cabinet position) by a non existent campaign by that enemy of conservatism and delayed Stockholm syndrome suffering aisle crossing wannabe democrat McCain, by a fawning press that provided no scrutiny at all (and continues to treat Obama as would the parents of a severly retarded child in that it seems to give thanks that the jackass did not actually soil himself in public in any given day ) Obama although a poor candidate was clearly a much better candidate than he is a President. Indeed Jummy Carter should be pleased as he has now been releived of the mantle worst most incompetent President ever by an affirmnative action created joke. Any conservative ticket would be much better for everyone than the Obama/ bozo Biden (on whom the bumbling brainless movie character Frank Drebben must have been modelled) two stooge low level vaudiville act we presently have. The world press and indeed the IMF has recognised for some time now that Obama and bozo Biden are way out of their depth and are dragging the country and the world financial systems down with them. 2012 will see a new President and in 2013 we cleanse the Whitehouse.
Comment: #5
Posted by: joseph wright
Wed Apr 20, 2011 1:49 PM
Sarah Palin is anything but grotesque!

To the Sarah Palin haters: 1. She was / is loved in Alaska. 2. Took on and beat the 'old boy' political network. 3. What exactly has she done to warrant the severe hate-mongering? 98% of America never heard of her before Senator John McCain picked her for VP!

Nuff Said...Dennis
Comment: #6
Posted by: Dennis
Wed Apr 20, 2011 11:23 PM
Oh Dear Susan:

The desperation is obvious, your non-qualified candidate is so stupid that he makes "regular stupid" - SMART!

You have an audience of 5 and you could not sway a kernal of popcorn to support your position

Please retire and let those who have more than three coherent brain cells write the stories!
Comment: #7
Posted by: dc
Thu Apr 21, 2011 5:37 AM
The Republicans have many, many very excellent potential candidates not mentioned here. They just happen to currently feel they don't have enough experience to serve, unlike the current president. However these potential candidates might be feel obligated to serve their country if it looks like BHO has a chance in hell of getting reelected.
Comment: #8
Posted by: Early
Thu Apr 21, 2011 7:51 AM
The good people of America need to find a way to convinve Chris Christie to run for POTUS in 2012. Run Chris! RUN!
Comment: #9
Posted by: John
Thu Apr 21, 2011 12:29 PM
This is a sad field of Rattlesnake Republicans. A Rattlesnake Republican is one who runs for office and does not mention his or her true agenda. A prime example of this is Scott Walker of Wisconsin and Chris Christie and John Kasich who never warned the public that they were anti-union and anti-teacher. If they had campaigned on that issue, none of the three would have been elected. The majority of current republican candidates have no positive agenda. All they do is bash the President. It is clear that anyone who falls for the BIRTHER issue is a person very capable of being duped. Title 8 Section 1406 of the United States Code very clearly lays out the qualifications of citizenship. One provision is that being born to a mother who is a US citizen at the time of birth is a qualifier. Both John McCain and Barack Obama meet this test..McCain , however was born in Panama. Obama was born in Hawaii. But that does not make McCain less of a citizen than Obama. The birther nut jobs who refuse to read the US Code are mentally challenged. Since that includes Trump and Palin, I am surprised that you are touting Palin, Susan. You are a lawyer,Susan, and should have debunked this Birther nonsense with lines from the US Code.
Comment: #10
Posted by: robert lipka
Thu Apr 21, 2011 3:31 PM
Hawaii does have long form form birth certificates. I've seen them. Why can't we see Obama's? I don't get it! It's such a simple request. Doesn't anyone out there want to put a plaque up at the physical location of the birth of our first black president? We do it for all other presidents!
Comment: #11
Posted by: Early
Fri Apr 22, 2011 6:49 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Susan Estrich
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

22 Feb 2012 Who's in Charge?

23 Mar 2012 Mitt Romney and Mike Dukakis

23 Nov 2007 So Much for the Student Vote