creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Susan Estrich
15 Feb 2012
That's What Friends Are For

Here we go again: a tragedy in the music world, a tragedy waiting to happen that did. Disturbing headlines … Read More.

10 Feb 2012
What Happened to Newt and Mitt?

Newt's easy. While all of us on the Democratic side were playing "root for Newt," Republicans were … Read More.

8 Feb 2012
Chasing Equality

Tuesday's ruling by a panel of three judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit … Read More.

The Other Marriage Penalty

Share Comment

Energy czar-designate Carol Browner's husband does it. So does Health and Human Services Secretary-designate Tom Daschle's wife. Congressman John Dingell's wife has been doing it for years.

Should they all be forced to stop and go home and bake some of those chocolate-chip cookies, the very mention of which got Secretary of State-designate Hillary Clinton in so much trouble so many years ago?

Former Sen. Daschle's wife is a lobbyist. So are former Congressman Tom Downey — aka Mr. Browner — and Debbie Dingell.

The Obama administration has announced new and much-needed limits on lobbying for those who take jobs in the administration. It's the latest attempt to make the ever-revolving door spin a little more slowly. But it raises, in a bad week, the issue of how, if at all, spouses should be allowed to go through that door.

It's a bad week because one of the reasons being offered as to why securities regulators took so long to figure out that Bernie Madoff was running a Ponzi scheme might have something to do with the fact that his niece, Shana Madoff, who was general counsel to the firm founded by her uncle, is now married to one of the former Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) lawyers charged with keeping an eye on Madoff.

Shana and Eric Swanson met in 2003, started dating in April 2006 and married last year. He left the SEC in 2006, after participating in the examination of Madoff's operations in 1999 and 2004. There is certainly more than enough blame to go around in this one, and Swanson's reps are saying that his role in investigating Bernie came before his relationship with Shana, even if the dates do look close.

If nothing else, it proves that rules are needed, both for mates and dates, to ensure both the reality and the appearance of integrity, not to mention to avoid financial gloom and doom.

Back in 1992, as some might recall, Hillary Clinton came under fire for her role in representing banks and other financial institutions (what was the name of that savings and loan?) that were subject to state regulation at a time when her husband was governor of the state and appointed the regulators.

Her less than artful effort to defend her decision to work full time as a lawyer (at a time when the salary for the governor of Arkansas topped out at $30,000) posed the alternative of staying home and baking chocolate-chip cookies — a slip of tongue that has left her baking countless chocolate-chip cookies ever since.

The point was that law firms, at least most of them, do represent banks and other financial institutions, and that avoiding the appearance of conflicts when you're a corporate lawyer married to the governor is a difficult if not impossible task.

The good news is that Michelle Obama, herself a trained but lapsed lawyer, apparently has no plans to join Covington and Burling once she moves to town.

But the other Cabinet spouses, not to mention the large number of congressional spouses who work as lobbyists, are likely to come under increasing scrutiny thanks to the new Obama rules and the questions about the relationship between Mr. Swanson and Ms. Madoff.

Last I checked, Washington had no shortage of bakeries. Besides, I'm not sure Tom Downey knows how to bake chocolate-chip cookies.

Marrying someone who opts for public service is always going to require certain sacrifices, like never seeing your spouse, filling out endless forms and the fact that for most people in top jobs, pay checks that sound like a lot are actually substantially less than what they could earn in the private sector. But it shouldn't also necessitate the sacrifice of your career. And lobbying in Washington is a major career choice.

The obvious answer is that spouses of public officials should not be allowed to lobby their spouse's departments. They should not be allowed to lobby Congress on the issues over which their spouses have jurisdiction. By the same token, public officials should not be reviewing or regulating businesses or concerns in which their spouses have jobs, financial interests, etc.

Adapting those rules to congressional spouses is obviously a bit trickier since Congress has jurisdiction over everything, but that's all the more reason to do so. Lobbying your spouse may be a part of every marriage, but it shouldn't be a form of outside employment.

To find out more about Susan Estrich and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

5 Comments | Post Comment
I would suggest that if there is a conflict of interest, for example, a spouse that is a lobbist, the job should not be offered. There is too much money in Washington and too many of our public officials have incestous relationships and it is just a "good old boy" system. Let's get back to basics and serve our country and not let our country serve us.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Anne
Fri Dec 19, 2008 10:07 AM
Michelle Obama took a huge salary increase from a hospital that had just received a multi-million dollar grant engineered by her husband Barack Obama. Typical Chicago style tit for tat payoff. With this history of ethical lapse already a part of the Obama family fabric, how can we expect other families to be ethically accountable?
We can't
Comment: #2
Posted by: robert lipka
Fri Dec 19, 2008 3:13 PM
Again, you fight for your friend Hillary but come on Susan, enough is enough. The Clinton's are dirty and have always been dirty and will destroy who ever gets in their way. Obama better watch his back because we know he has made Hillary very angry and now is trying to pacify her to keep her quiet. These next 4 years are going to be rocky but entertaining to watch.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Kathaleen McCausland
Sat Dec 20, 2008 5:56 AM
More business as usual type advice from a wannabe Washington insider type. Susan's probably angling for an appointment since even with her extra-liberal slant, she can't seem to get at least a book deal. Maybe a lobbying job would be a nice consolation prize.

Seriously, any ethical person(s) would automatically know that having a lobbyist spouse only will drive the deals into a more secretive level, but the money will still be offered, and something expected of it if and when accepted. It's an ethical greyzone and any ethical official will avoid it, and the spouse should expect to take on a job that won't conflict. After all, we have to assume the couple discussed the matter before the election so it's a choice, not an unfair situation to the lobbyist parter.

Al
Comment: #4
Posted by: AL HANDA
Wed Dec 24, 2008 1:39 PM
The integrity of a government position is worth vastly more than the career ambitions of a spouse. Susan, you are a bit too obsessed with careers and less interested in the integrity of government.

The issue isn't returning to baking cookies, the issue is, between the couple, whether one is willing to find other outlets for their talents for the sake of honest government service.

The Clintons are an extreme example, but is is so flagrantly clear that Bill's massive financial interests with Arabs and other hostile groups prevent her from serving in the state department. And the hypocrisy of the lintons knows no boundary -- she boasted in the campaign of her sole speech in China about women's rights, yet her husband and family foundations take vast sums from countries where women aren't even allowed to drive.

At some point Hillaryy had to decide, country or career. She clearly has always chosen career.

As for the others, this country can live without a few lobbyists. These spouses can find other work, and if they can't this is a remarkable country, full of talent, and we can find plenty of unconflicted people for these positions.

Susan, get over it - careers aren't everything.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Alex K.
Wed Dec 24, 2008 6:07 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Susan Estrich
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 15 Feb 2012

14 Nov 2008 President Hillary

21 Oct 2009 Parents Behaving Badly

23 Jan 2008 Where is Oprah?