opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Susan Estrich
5 Feb 2016
Donald Trump: Sore Loser

It was the shortest speech anyone can remember him giving. He was clearly in a state of disbelief. How could … Read More.

3 Feb 2016
Rubio's the One

You can pick your headline for Iowa: "Trump Didn't Win!" "Hillary Didn't Lose!" "Rubio's the One!" I prefer … Read More.

29 Jan 2016
Donald Ducks

"I'm for Trump," the man across the room from me said. We were in the ICU family waiting room, and by that point,… Read More.

The New Chelsea Clinton


Former first daughter Chelsea Clinton's debut on NBC's "Nightly News" is drawing plenty of attention, as well it should. Since her father's election nearly 20 years ago, the Clintons set an example of real family values by doing everything they could to keep Chelsea out of the spotlight and allow her to live as normal of a life as possible. By all outside indicators, it worked. She has grown up to be a young woman of intelligence, character and commitment. The press, for its part, pretty much left her alone.

Until she became one of them, sort of.

When NBC announced her three-month contract, Clinton was roundly criticized both for joining the ranks of those she had studiously avoided and for not making herself available for interviews when she did. The first criticism seemed silly. Politicians and their kids are a fixture on television news, even those who once complained about how unfairly they were treated by the media and even by the very networks for whom they now work.

Meghan McCain's father, former presidential candidate Sen. John McCain, never has been a fan of MSNBC, which didn't — and shouldn't — stop his daughter from working there. I am sure George W. Bush tunes in whenever his daughter Jenna appears on NBC's "Today" show, although he has been skewered more times than he might choose to count by the network that produces "Saturday Night Live." Former Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm is prepping her new show at Current TV; while Sarah Palin and "Huckabee" are staples at Fox.

Clinton probably did make a mistake in not appearing at a press conference when her hiring was announced — not because she would have said any more than the press release, but because it gave the media something more legitimate to complain about. So be it.

But her first report on Monday night demonstrated why her decision makes perfect sense.

It was a report on a woman in President Bill Clinton's home state of Arkansas who has devoted herself to providing after-school support for at-risk kids. It was the kind of story that networks do now and again — the "hero of the week" type of thing — and that gets almost no attention. Because Chelsea Clinton did it, it got plenty of attention.

That is precisely the point.

Some people seek out celebrity. Others are born into it. What troubles me, frankly, is when parents use their children to make celebrities of themselves (you can fill in the names here) or push their children to take on the trappings of celebrity that they aren't able to handle (another easy fill-in-the-blank exercise). But Clinton is no longer a child, and she will always be a celebrity. The question that matters now that she is an adult is how she will use it.

In explaining her decision to go public, as if she weren't already, Clinton said her grandmother, Dorothy Rodham, who died last month, urged her to do more with her fame. Taking her advice, Clinton decided to lead a "purposefully public life."

Let's be honest here. Chelsea Clinton is famous and will be for some time to come. She could use that fame to get a front-row seat at the fashion shows, to get invited to the best Oscar parties, to get designers and jewelers to lend her their baubles. She could sell pictures of her private life for a pretty penny to any magazine or tabloid in the world, as so many celebrities do. She could turn her life into a reality show.

Being famous gives you power that others don't have. It gives you the power to set an example, good or bad. It gives you the power to be noticed, for better or for worse.

It gives you the power to tell a story that will (only) be noticed because you tell it.

That is the kind of power Chelsea Clinton has chosen to exercise. And I say more power to her for that.

To find out more about Susan Estrich and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at



6 Comments | Post Comment
Or maybe she will really follow in her fafher's footsteps in the workplace and play an active part in "bjs" or sodomy with cigars in the executive news office or maybe she will follow her mother in playing an active part in protecting abusers of women in the way the mother protected the father, the rapist and serial sexual abuser of women president, whose act of rape and acts of serial abuse were also excused and glossed over by Estrich { the self styled but clearlyselective warrior against rape] because he was a liberal democrat president.
Comment: #1
Posted by: joseph wright
Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:32 PM
My sincere apologies to all that I may have offended by the previous rash post, particularly to Chelsea Clinton. I seem to have wrongly let my aminus towards the mother and father transfer to the daughter.
Comment: #2
Posted by: joseph wright
Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:59 PM
She will succeed or fail based on her own abilities and talents.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Early
Wed Dec 14, 2011 4:59 AM

"Seemed to", the way the KKK "seems to" disllike black folks and Jews?

Comment: #4
Posted by: capiscan
Wed Dec 14, 2011 5:14 AM

Clinton & so-called 'family values'!

Nuff Said...Dennis
Comment: #5
Posted by: Dennis
Wed Dec 14, 2011 5:19 PM
Dear Susan,
I watched Chelsea Clinton's debut and was not impressed but I was not unimpressed. She did a good job for a first-timer. The piece was not much more than a fluff piece and I was impressed by the lady who was the heroine of the feature. We need more people like that all around our society. We should award them with our praise as often as we can. I suspect that Chelsea will get better as time goes on and she becomes more and more accustomed to being in front of a camera. There is no reason that children of famous people should be barred from trading on that fame........we would miss a whole line of actors and actresses from the Barrymore family if there was such a bar.
I wish Chelsea well and I hope that she will move on to more hard-hitting reporting and stories.
Comment: #6
Posted by: robert lipka
Wed Dec 14, 2011 6:57 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Susan Estrich
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 8 Feb 2016
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 6 Feb 2016
diane dimond
Diane DimondUpdated 6 Feb 2016

22 Mar 2013 Is Nothing Private?

15 Jan 2014 Life According To Sam

20 Mar 2015 The Ryan Giroux Problem