creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Susan Estrich
17 Feb 2012
The Santorum Surge

Could it really happen? Could Rick Santorum be the Republican nominee? Is God a Democrat? Not to be mean, but … Read More.

15 Feb 2012
That's What Friends Are For

Here we go again: a tragedy in the music world, a tragedy waiting to happen that did. Disturbing headlines … Read More.

10 Feb 2012
What Happened to Newt and Mitt?

Newt's easy. While all of us on the Democratic side were playing "root for Newt," Republicans were … Read More.

The Last Lap

Share Comment

It was 30 years ago that we first put national health insurance in the Democratic Party platform. I was working for Ted Kennedy then. We had lost the nomination to Jimmy Carter, but both sides were still fighting. Whatever we were for, President Carter and his team were against. And we were very much for health care.

We took it to the floor of the Democratic convention in New York, knowing that the Carter campaign would never be able to hold on to their union delegates in a roll call vote. They couldn't. We won handily, even though Carter controlled two-thirds of the delegates.

If anyone had told me then that we'd still be having the same debate 30 years later, and that it would turn (once again) not on convincing Republicans but Democrats, I would have asked them what they were smoking.

And yet here we are, maybe, possibly, finally nearing an end to that debate.

Can the president of the United States get the handful of votes he seems to still need to pass his health care bill? Don't bet against it. Minority Leader John Boehner may be ready to declare victory — as he did on the Sunday talk-show circuit this weekend — but 30 years tells me, not so fast.

Most members of Congress want more than anything to keep being members of Congress, which is why they spend so much time raising money. Boehner, with his predictions of a Republican conquest if the Democrats enact health care reform, is giving "Blue Dog" Democrats their Miranda warnings: This vote can and will be used against you by your Republican opponent. No doubt.

But at least two powerful forces weigh on the other side. The first is ambition. Almost every member of Congress sees a president when they look in the mirror to shave (or put on makeup) in the morning. For Democrats in marginal districts, the risks of voting with the president are obvious.

But so are the risks of switching sides and letting him, and the party, down.

Your Republican opponent will still attack you — for being a gutless wonder, which, if you ask me, is even worse than being wrong. And loyal (to the president) Democrats will never forgive you — including fellow members, rich donors, supportive unions and partisans everywhere. Even if it allows you to keep your seat, that's all you'll ever be. And if you lose, forget a future in politics. No job in the administration. No comeback kid. The rule in politics is: Don't get mad. Get even.

The second is the power of the presidency. That includes the power to locate projects in your district, guarantee that you have goodies for your constituents and make sure grants go to local hospitals, schools or subways.

"Is this an election or an auction?" the late Anne Wexler, then an aide to Carter, famously asked in 1980. Her comment was in response to the phenomenon that whenever the Kennedy campaign scheduled a visit to a hospital or housing project, the institution would suddenly find itself receiving a long-sought contract or award on the eve of the senator's arrival. Kennedy grants, we called them.

But the president's power goes beyond his grant-making capacities, beyond his ability to marshal funds and make plum appointments.

President Eisenhower's chief of staff used to tell the story of bringing people in to see his boss after they had heaped criticism on him, telling him everything that he and the president had done wrong. Once inside the Oval Office, however, with the president looking them in the eye, staunch critics would turn into purring pussycats.

In my experience, it even happens with candidates. It's one thing to say no to the speaker or the chief of staff. It's quite another to say no to the president of your own party.

My bet is that the president will find his votes. If only Teddy were still here to be one of them.

To find out more about Susan Estrich and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

6 Comments | Post Comment
My web site http://members.cox.net/medcoms/index.html presents a non controversial way to improve health care. Please use your influence to have the congressional budget office do a cost/benefit analysis of the concept.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Joe Miller
Tue Mar 16, 2010 9:47 PM
Ms Estrich forgets the basis of representation: voters in the Congressional Districts and their interests. She would have members of Congress subvert that charge by allegiance to party and Presidential payoffs to favored people and organizations. But, in her world, people of all interests in districts should be subordinate to the party and president in power. That's the old Soviet style. Ms Estrich embraces it, as you can tell.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Doug Matthews
Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:37 AM
All of the democrats and yourself should be ashamed of yourself for selling your souls. It is at the point of disgrace the way our government is acting. I am proud of my country but embarrassed by my government and the way the people we have elected are acting. VOTE THEM ALL OUT!!! Susan, how can you look yourself in the mirror????
Comment: #3
Posted by: Kathaleen
Wed Mar 17, 2010 9:57 AM
I want everyone voted out who has their name on this mess this is not health care reform and this will destroy or health care system. I want November to come tomorrow as everyone you admire and support Susan is going to be out on their ear and I will personally cheer when Nancy Pelosi is OUT as the majority leader and I never have to look at her and the havoc she and her cohorts have pushed on our country again! I am fifty years old and I have never seen lawlessness like this in my entire life!
Comment: #4
Posted by: kay
Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:08 AM
Susan, I have always admired you for your straight honest opinions, even though I disagreed with most of them.
But when you say "being a gutless wonder -- if you ask me -- is even worse than being wrong" does this mean, even if you are wrong you should be loyal to the party and the President?? Maybe I am interpreting this wrong, but if someone determines they are wrong on an issue, are you saying they should still support that issue?? If true, how honest is that??
Comment: #5
Posted by: jim
Thu Mar 18, 2010 9:30 AM
Susan's opinions stopped being important or interesting when she sold herself to FAUX News. She is a brilliant woman . They must have offered a bundle of $$$$ to become a part of the rethuglican echo chamber.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Mary Ann Dinan
Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:53 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Susan Estrich
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 20 Feb 2012
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 18 Feb 2012

21 Nov 2007 Great Expectations

1 Feb 2008 What Happened to John Edwards?

30 Jul 2010 Chelsea's Wedding