creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Susan Estrich
25 May 2012
The Next Education President

Mitt Romney is right about one thing: Too many American children do receive what he this week called a … Read More.

23 May 2012
Susan Mary Riley, We Will Miss You

It's her voice that I keep hearing in my head. "Susan," she would say, in that quiet, commanding … Read More.

18 May 2012
Boring

When my kids were young, about the worst thing they could say about something was that it was capital-b BORRRING.… Read More.

The Killing at the Corner

Share Comment

When I drove by my corner grocery store last Sunday, the crime tape had already gone up and half a dozen police cars were parked in front. By the time I drove back home an hour later, there was a biohazard truck, along with a half-dozen more police cars and officers diverting traffic from the lot. "What happened?" I said. "An incident," the traffic officer answered, and then refused to tell us what kind of incident. A biohazard vehicle at the corner grocery? Literally a dozen police cars? The TV trucks arrived the next morning.

As it turned out, the nice African-American lady who always smiles at the checkout line allegedly had been stabbed by an African-American male. The reports said she was in critical condition, and gave his height and weight.

By the next day, she was dead, and her estranged husband had been arrested.

In one terrible way, it was a relief. There wasn't a random murder on the corner of my quiet street. Some terrible criminal was not at-large. It wouldn't have mattered if I or, worse, one of my kids had been at the store on Sunday afternoon. It wasn't a hold-up gone bad. Shoppers were not the target.

In another way, it was a terrible reminder. When a woman is killed, the first suspect is always the significant other. Women worry about strangers, but it is the wrong men in their lives — husbands and lovers, especially the estranged kind — who are by far the most dangerous.

In the old days, we used to complain that the system didn't take domestic violence seriously. Family quarrels, they were called. Arrests were rare, as were restraining orders. Many women didn't even bother to complain, knowing that it was more likely to make things worse than to accomplish anything.

Times have certainly changed. Police are trained to take incidents of domestic violence seriously. Women get all the help they need from courts in securing restraining orders against the men in their lives who threaten them; such requests are almost never denied.

Indeed, these days, it is common to hear complaints from those men, sometimes legitimately so, that such charges are used as bargaining chips in contentious divorces, even when unsupported by evidence.

The problem is that too often it doesn't matter. All the restraining orders in the world won't prevent a man from surprising his wife at work, approaching her and stabbing her 20 times. The news reports haven't said (at least not yet) whether that nice lady had such an order, but it's hard to see that it would have made much difference. Had she had time, she could have called the police, and he would have been arrested and held. But most of the time, women have no time. Even when they do, the men aren't locked up forever.

Oh, yes, there are the three-day lockups, the required anger-management programs and the like. It's better than it used to be. But not good enough. Too many women are still afraid to use the tools that are available. Too many women still find that those tools are not enough. When you have children, when you are financially dependent, when the bad guy knows where you work at a job that you need, when you can't, for all kinds of reasons, go underground and hide and disappear, a restraining order is just a piece of paper that doesn't save your life.

I don't know the answer. Lock them up longer in the first instance? Sure. Hope the first instance is the last? Absolutely. Improve those anger-management courses? Why not?

But there are no guarantees. I tell young women to beware the tough guys who look so attractive at first, to pay as much attention to who they let into their lives as they do to who they would let into the house if the doorbell rang. If it sounds like blaming the victim, that's not what I mean. Just protect yourself. If any good is to come of the tragedy on my corner, perhaps it will be that someone reading this, or someone who shops at my local store, will remember that bad guys rarely turn good, that violence tends to escalate, and that in most cases, the only answer is to get out at the first sign.

In the meantime, I will miss the smiling lady at the corner grocery.

To find out more about Susan Estrich and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM


Comments

20 Comments | Post Comment
Evil exists in all forms. Always has and always will. Government, sometimes evil itself, can't eliminate it but definitely can promote it through its policies.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Early
Wed Aug 24, 2011 5:06 AM
So a black man allegedely stabbed his estranged wife and killed her. Horrible yes, tragic yes, but hardly out of the ordinary. Happens every day.

What does not happen every day is the Vice President of America visiting China and not having the courage to disparage its one child only policy that directly causes forced abortion, forced sterilization and the mass killing of girl children.

The best Bozo the VP could do was say that it was economically unsustainable but that he would not second guess it. The Whitehouse was yesterday forced to try to make amends for Biden's cowardice and say second hand on his behalf that the policy was repugnant.

Estrich purports to speak upon rights of women and the danger they face but when given opportunity to voice criticism of an inhuman practice directly affecting women avoids the reported issue entirely because it will necessarily include the criticism of an Administration for which she is nothing but an ideaologically attuned schill.
Comment: #2
Posted by: joseph wright
Wed Aug 24, 2011 5:42 AM
Susan,

I was just reading a similar story only the guy killed not only his wife but two of their children. He was white. Happens every day it seems. Race is NOT the overriding factor in these cases,,,mental stability is the problem.
Now on to a related story. Khadaffi has been overthrown and is now in hiding. I note that NOT ONE AMERICAN MOM HAD TO STAND BY A GRAVESITE AS HER SON OR DAUGHTER WAS LOWERED IN AS A RESULT OF BEING KILLED IN lIBYA. This was due to the very well crafted strategy of the Obama Administration to let the Libyans free themselves. It saved American lives and it assures that there will be NO residual hatred for the Americans as a result of this well crafted strategy. Of course, all the right-wing candidates weighed in negatively on this masterful success. but there will be no mothers of dead soldiers protesting outside the white house based on the Libyan conflict. It was a great thing to see American newsmen being hoisted on the shoulders of the young rebels in triumph. Shouts of God Bless America could be heard in the background. But of course, no credit will be given to this Administration by the right-wing crazies who fail to see that this outcome was achieved without one drop of US blood. The future will be determined with the Libyans in charge. It will be up to them to chosose wisely their leaders. Sadly, outside organizations such as Al-Quida and the muslim brotherhood may try to gain control but it certainly can't be too much worse than the brutal and terroristic rule of Khadaffi.
Bin Ladin GONE,,,Khaddffi GONE two brilliant successes and not one American killed.
Comment: #3
Posted by: robert lipka
Wed Aug 24, 2011 9:50 AM
Re: robert lipka
Re Libya. Cuckoo ! Cuckoo! Cuckoo ! The random thoughts of an Obamaphile.
Obama washing his hands of the matter, like Pilot, and letting everyone and indeed anyone decide what to do with US dollars and resources {make no mistake we were paying for it] because he had and contines to have no clue what to do is neither leadership nor a well crafted strategy nor a masterful success. It is simply a continuation of his policy of of voting present when decisions have to be made and an imcompetence which might with luck and a fair wind pan out if Al-Quaeda and other Islamic extremists do not take charge. Obama has no idea what is about to happen just as he has no clue what is happening in Egypt. Foreign policy amateur hour. If Obama made any decision it was that he decided to avoid a situation in which he would be called upon to make a decision.
Re Bin Laden to the extent that Obama deserves credit is simply for the fact that he did not screw it up but let those competent to undertake the task get on with it.
Seems odd that Obama the excuser in Chief and indeed the excuse in chief for a president simultaneously out of one side of his mouth is eager to take credit for the so called arab spring but at the same rushes time blame it for his utter recklessness and incompetence on the jobs and economy front.
Not one American killed. Not yet that is. Who knows what horrors Obama's hands off approach to Egypt, Libya and more seriously Iran will bring.
Comment: #4
Posted by: joseph wright
Wed Aug 24, 2011 11:18 AM
"The random thoughts of an Obamaphile."

LOL, That describes 90% of Susan's articles.

From what I can tell in our area, just as many women abuse men as does men abused women. However, there is no men's shelter for men to run to after they are beaten by their wives.

So I tell young men to beware the psyco American female, especially the Feminazi, who look so attractive at first, to pay as much attention to who they let into their lives as they do to who they would let into the house if the doorbell rang. If it sounds like blaming the victim, that's not what I mean. Just protect yourself. Please remember that bad gals rarely turn good, that violence tends to escalate, and that in most cases, the only answer is to get out at the first sign.

The difference is, you can't depend on the cops to protect you as after your wife beats you and the cops are called YOU will probably go to jail, for two days mandatory. And when you get out of jail, if your wife/girlfriend is still around, you will be locked out of your house. But many times, your girlfriend will simply rent a truck and take everything you own and disappear; at least until the money's gone and she's contracted AIDS from her numerous sexual encounters, afterwhich she will slither back and asked you to let her back into your house. Don't do it.

Feminazis represent the worst that women have to offer society and unfortunately they are also the most vocal.



Comment: #5
Posted by: SusansMirror
Wed Aug 24, 2011 12:03 PM
Re: J. Wright
I am not aware thatwe elected Nostrodamus as president. No one can see into the future and predict with accuracy what is going to happen....if we could,,,I would have hit the pick six at Saratoga when I was up there a few days back instead of only hve five of six winners...!! We can reasonably predict what "MIGHT" happen and build our strategy based on possibilities but we can never be certain. At least Wright concedes the FACT that no American was killed in either of these take-out operations. That is a direct effect of good pre-planning. The results prove that the strategy was correct.
Turning the operation over to a brace of countries via NATO allowed us control of the situation without the direct responsibility. To suggest that the decisions were turned over wily-nilly is absurd as the United States is and has been for years, the guiding force behind NATO.
The ALMOST-PRESIDENT John McCAin weighed in with some incoherant remarks as did that great foreign policy expert Michele Bachmann. SNOWMOBILE SNOOKI PALIN also showed off her international foreign policy expertise with some truly inane remarks casting dispersions on the Administration strategy, but all three had to grudgingly admit that Khadaffy is through. None of them weighed in with how THEY would have handled this situation. It is easy to criticize but it is genius to actually perform. Too bad their jealosy and bigotry shows through so transparently. AS it does with the remarks of any other person or candidate who can't see this for the success it is and give credit where credit is due. Jeb Bush is exactly correct on this point.
Comment: #6
Posted by: robert lipka
Wed Aug 24, 2011 12:38 PM
Re: robert lipka

Cuckoo! Cuckoo ! Cuckoo !
Comment: #7
Posted by: joseph wright
Wed Aug 24, 2011 1:00 PM
Hardly anyway to tell. My dad was violent. When he was young, he was considered a "good catch" according to my mother: good-looking, smart, etc. I innately grew up disliking his type. The qualities of arrogance, deep resentment towards being questioned, etc. are warning signs, but really, it's just a creepy vibe and you have to stay far away from it no matter what else is in the mix.

Realistically, a certain percentage of men are violent or have other deep flaws. You can argue about whether it is 3%, 15%, or 30%, but they exist. That means a certain percentage of women are going to either live with violence or be in need an alternative route of some kind - be it career, cheating with another woman's man, the nunnery, government assistance - something. Every society since the beginning of time has had to deal with this reality.

The final solution isn't self-esteem and "better choices" because at core, it's just a numbers game. When backlash types or even other women snark at older, unmarried single career women, all I can think of is that it's so much better than being married to a violent executive guy.

In my darker moments, I theorize that this is the best thing about the military and similar professions. It can direct the overt aggression towards other militaries which is better than having it come out at home.
Comment: #8
Posted by: colleen
Wed Aug 24, 2011 8:17 PM
Re: colleen
Great post Colleen. You are 99 per cent right.......the only thing that might be wrong is your theory about the military redirecting violence. I remember well learning the basics of warcraft and military violence during my basic training.......BUT when I left the military I do NOT recall having any violence deprogramming. Many of the unstable military men go home with this anger and rage in their heart and live like little tyrants. At my men's club, this often manifests itself when many of these veterans speak about others. All the men are ex-service members and none of these guys has ever had any violence deprogramming training prior to leaving their branch of service. This has often been proposed as a requirement for dischage, but never gained enough traction to be seriously considered. The reason is that we lose track of military men once they leave active service. We don't know for certain how many of these men have properly readjusted. The majority do readjust well but....?
But thank you for a fine post.
Comment: #9
Posted by: robert lipka
Thu Aug 25, 2011 6:32 AM
Re: colleen
See, very vocal.
Comment: #10
Posted by: SusansMirror
Thu Aug 25, 2011 6:33 AM
Re: colleen

Very vocal.
Comment: #11
Posted by: SusansMirror
Thu Aug 25, 2011 6:34 AM
Anger management courses - what a crock of bull.
Comment: #12
Posted by: pb1222
Thu Aug 25, 2011 6:54 AM
I'm not sure where you live that the police have done a better job of helping x wives or girlfriends with restraining orders but in Jacksonville Florida there is still major problems with enforcing the orders and basically working with the local government agencies. For example my daughter called the police about her x coming in her home smashing her phone, computer and taking money from her purse. What the police said when they got there was, since he had left, it was her word against his. So what did the police do? They reported to DCF because she said she was concerned about the kids seeing this type of things. What did DCF do? Nothing to him but she and the kids had to go to 6 weeks of coping classes at Hubbard House. Boy did that do a lot to discourage him. When she was trying to get child support and restraining orders issued the people treated her like she was the problem instead of him. The perception needs to be changed. The police need to be more aggressive to the x husbands or boyfriends then maybe they wouldn't keep coming back. Even though there is a warrant out for his arrest for back child support, over $40,000, the courts say she has to let the child go with her father. I say if you don't support your child you should have to give up your parental rights until you are doing the right thing for your child and supporting them. Also, why is it that he has had his license taken away for non-support but the police didn't take him to jail? Even with a warrant nobody goes and gets him and when they do stop him he doesn't go to jail. Who is making theses rules? It is like the court order is just a joke when it comes to child support. The system seems to be in favor of the x instead of the child. How can that be? And as far as the Child Support Enforcement Agency that might as well be disbanded because they do nothing. All they do is if you can give them every bit of information about the x, they might send a letter to his work and then you have to wait months before anything happens. If there is a court order why do you have to wait for the company to ok child support being taken out it should be automatic connected to his social security number. There are so many things that could be done to fix some of these problems but no one will take the inative to fix anything.
Comment: #13
Posted by: Nancy Reier
Thu Aug 25, 2011 7:33 AM
Domestic violence and abuse can happen to anyone and can do so no matter what gender, strength , profession or ex profession of the victim. Domestic or spousal abuse occurs when one partner endeavors to dominate the other using for example fear, guilt, shame, intimidation or other method. When such abuse is coupled with violence the correct term is domestic violence.
The above posters, for whatever personal, anecdotal, (and in Lipka's case simply because he routinely adopts the opinion of the last liberal writing he encounters and then massages unrelated facts to fit the opinion ) or other reasons, clearly associate the male as sole batterer and only females as the victims. Without minimizing the importance of understanding and ending abuse of women [in this country and abroad particularly with girl children in China and the abuse of women as a religious rite in the Muslim world] an equally important but mostly unreported or not properly reported fact exists, to wit, women can indeed be and often are the abuser and the committer of violence and some men [those pathetic creatures who let themselves be] can be the victim of domestic violence.
Over the last twenty-five years, leading sociologists have repeatedly found that men and women commit domestic violence at similar rates. The phenomenon of husband battering is as prevalent as wife abuse is confirmed by nationally representative studies, such as the Family Violence Surveys, as well as by numerous other sources.
However, despite the wealth and diversity of the sociological research and the consistency of the findings, female violence is not generally recognized within the extensive legal literature on domestic violence.
I suppose Lipka, if your post is to be taken seriously, that those female abusers are only abusers because they were not offered deprogramming in gender warfare when they left the feminist movement.
Comment: #14
Posted by: joseph wright
Thu Aug 25, 2011 9:36 AM
@Joseph Wright: The word you are looking for is "Pilate" vs Pilot. Robert may be a Obamaphile but he can spell.

@Colleen: Please remember that the military is an all volunteer force and that military personnel come from all walks of life. Also to remember, we are not all men!
Comment: #15
Posted by: capiscan
Thu Aug 25, 2011 11:34 AM
Re: capiscan
You are of course correct. I am grateful for the correction. The error, embarrassing as it is, does not however dilute the points made. I shall, if I may, look to you for proof reading henceforth.
Comment: #16
Posted by: joseph wright
Thu Aug 25, 2011 12:15 PM
Dear Capisan:
Thank you for attempting to defend me but I have to point out that for months, Mr. Wright routinely attacks anything that I post and MISCHARACTERIZES a lot of what I say. His profile is of a person who hates blacks, hates Hispanics and hates anyone who does not think as he thinks. His bigotry has been displayed repeatedly. He lacks the ability to post a successful and coherant argument so he constantly resorts to simpleminded insults like the ones posted above............
I am NOT an Obamaphile but I have come to respect this president as a thoughtful and prudent thinker who has tackled many problems since he has taken office. He has surprised me. In the last election, I voted for John McCain. And as time wore on, I have come to regret that vote because it was also a vote for Sarah Palin sho has since proved to be vastly wanting in so many ways.
As for my military experience,,,,,,I am an old geezer and a relic from the Vietnam Era so my perspective is based on the composition of the military in those days. Forgive me if I did not consider your modern-day experience with the new military and the all-volunteer force. Please share MORE of your experience with us. Your views are important for all of us to get a better understanding of how to cope with today's problems,
Enjoy your day !!!
Comment: #17
Posted by: robert lipka
Thu Aug 25, 2011 12:27 PM
Re: robert lipka
Indeed that was quite a defence from Capsican, agreeing as Capsican did that Lipka was indeed an Obamaphile and unintentionally (I suspect) undercutting his de programming rambling. That Lipka is indeed an Obamaphile is clear every time he endeavors to prop the jackass Obama up and to give him credit where absolutely none is deserved. I did not raise the point earlier but had Capsican chosen to revisit Lipka's posts then I am sure that the modifying position taken that he could spell would be rethought and indeed withdrawn. Leaving aside the repeated childlike and comical use of upper case letters for emphasis, I count numerous spelling and syntax errors. Still who cares?
As to the remainder of Lipka's post and the use of simpleminded insults without coherent opposing argument all one can say is "mirror mirror on the wall...
Comment: #18
Posted by: joseph wright
Thu Aug 25, 2011 2:24 PM
RE:J. Wright
Well capiscan now you see how Mr. Wright deliberately distorts people's posts and then proceed to feed of that distortion..
Wright say that "...agreeing as Capiscan did that Lipka was indeed an Obamaphile.....""" You did not say that what you posted was "...Robert may be and Obamaphile....." That is very different from what Wright dishonestly posted about YOUR post. He engages in these distrotions all the time......This was a tactic of the NAZIs in the thirties and the forties. Distort what people said and did and then slam them using the distortion. The tactic is despicable and dishonest but that is Wright's stock in trade. That and constant insults of people as he did in his last post in reference to the President of the United States who he constantly insults.
By the way, I suffer from a disease called Myasthenia Gravis and at times have serious vision problems which often results in me making typing mistakes that look like spelling errors. I don't edit them very well as I used to when I wrote my newspaper column years ago. My wife used to edit all my columns as she had a Liberal Arts degree in English. (Oh God I just realized that Mr. Wright will attack the word "Liberal" in my wife's college degree...I can't win Enjoy your weekend Capiscan, I am off to Ohio on business.
Comment: #19
Posted by: robert lipka
Thu Aug 25, 2011 6:41 PM
Obamapholes: I do not know if Barry can spell...probably not as he failed his bar exam due to fraud (probably had someone sit in for him), but I do know that he can read as he does very well with a teleprompter. By the way, Michelle also failed her bar exam. Not the smartest kids on the block are they?

RE: J. Wright
You are right on and it drives them nuts! Keep up the good work.

And Susan Estrich is so indoctrinated that she can't even think for herself.

Charlie Holmes USMC Viet Nam
Comment: #20
Posted by: Charlie
Thu Aug 25, 2011 11:00 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Susan Estrich
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

5 Sep 2007 Ratings Stunts

9 Mar 2012 In Memoriam: Andrew Breitbart

25 Sep 2009 FDA: Kiss Those Kiddie-Flavored Cigarettes Goodbye