creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Susan Estrich
25 May 2012
The Next Education President

Mitt Romney is right about one thing: Too many American children do receive what he this week called a … Read More.

23 May 2012
Susan Mary Riley, We Will Miss You

It's her voice that I keep hearing in my head. "Susan," she would say, in that quiet, commanding … Read More.

18 May 2012
Boring

When my kids were young, about the worst thing they could say about something was that it was capital-b BORRRING.… Read More.

The Final Days

Share Comment

For half of the candidates on Tuesday's ballot, these are the days you remember.

If you win, you remember what comes next. But if you lose, you always second-guess what came before. You have years — decades, even — to Monday morning quarterback your campaign, to revisit what you should have thought, said or done, especially in the final days, when time almost stops and you campaign day and night and it seems (usually wrongly) like every decision you make is crucial.

Mostly, they aren't so crucial. Most races are "decided" even now. Polls don't vote, but they're usually right (especially when they show you losing). But if the races that really are still up for grabs have already dwindled, if the last-minute decisions mostly won't determine who wins or loses, for those who lose, these are the final minutes in the spotlight.

My best advice to candidates is very simple: Use them well. They may not determine whether you win or lose, but they will define you in the public eye. They will be the measure of your class. This is legacy time, whether that's what you were aiming for or not.

This has not been the kind of campaign that would make a mother proud. Any mother. I don't know that I've ever seen a nastier, more mean-spirited race — but then, it feels like we say that every two years. Seriously, though: It. Has. Been. Bad.

In the old days, candidates really did switch back to positive ads in the closing days of campaigns. Closers, we called them, literally. Close on a positive note. What an old-fashioned thought. These days, only candidates with double-digit leads worry about closing positively.

No, the new danger in closing weekends of campaigns is that the worst of the past year or two all gets concentrated in one little weekend: all the attacks and counterattacks, and viciousness and innuendo, with the added protection that there is barely time to respond, much less figure out the truth.

Campaigns that have gone badly tend to end badly and leave everyone feeling angry and embittered. The truth is that they don't really end, even though they should.

We need to end this one on Tuesday. If not before.

I hope at least a few candidates in these closing days will stop to say something positive about their opponents, about the other party, about the need to work together after Tuesday, about the values and ideals we share and how they are far more important than what divides us.

I hope at least a few candidates will take the time to remind themselves, and us, why they got into this business in the first place, what they dreamt of, what they hoped to accomplish, and why it's important to still believe in such dreams even after you've been through such a process.

I hope at least a few will give the kind of speech they'll be proud to re-read when it's all over because it was right and true, and not just the product of careful research and polling; that a few will get ahead of the nastiness and the ugliness and will stand tall and proud and for something better than we've all been mucking through for the past few months.

I hope at least a few will be thinking of life after Wednesday, because it will make it a whole lot easier for all of us to get through the rest of the week ahead. The people who lose on Tuesday may not set the agenda for the future, but in defeat, they can set the tone. For better or for worse.

To find out more about Susan Estrich and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

10 Comments | Post Comment
Please explain - why are the Democratic candidates not running on their record if it was so good?
Comment: #1
Posted by: Early
Fri Oct 29, 2010 5:54 AM
Well said Ms. Estrich. Well said!
Comment: #2
Posted by: Helen Bacher
Fri Oct 29, 2010 7:47 PM
Susan Estrich, in a column published in the 10/30 edition of Easton Maryland's "Star Democrat" you tell us that even though he's not deserving of it we should vote for Harry Reid because of his loyalty to the President. Well, Susan, that's exactly why we shouldn't. Yet there's another reason to vote him out: He's recently gone on record declaring that he would put the interests of Nevada ahead of the interests of those of us in the other 49 states. Outrageous!
Comment: #3
Posted by: OLIVER BERLINER
Sat Oct 30, 2010 9:50 AM
Dear Ms. Estrich,

You have a lot of hypocritical gall stating "This election wouldn't make any mother proud." Duh, does the savaging of judge Bork and the lynching of Justice Thomas make YOU proud?

Nuff Said...Dennis
Comment: #4
Posted by: Dennis
Sat Oct 30, 2010 8:53 PM
Elections are not about mothers, they are about the winds that blow through the political spectrum. Be it a blue, or red wind they represent the current state of mind of the electorate. Obama has been given 18 months to turn his ship windward. he has chosen instead to defy the winds that blow, and his ship is nearing the rocky shores of a one term president. It is a shame that he did not use his four years to do something clearly American, what the people want. he instead flew a flag of stubbornness, and I know what is right for you.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Tony
Sat Oct 30, 2010 11:26 PM
Suzie you are around the bend.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Paul
Sun Oct 31, 2010 9:36 AM
It always seems that someone states the political season is "very mean" when their party of choice is not doing so well. Why is that liberal columnists alway lavish anyone in their party with praise and no or only meager criticism that perhaps a mother would use to encourage her children to do better with? However, when they refer to the conservatives they can never make a positive statement. Whatever happened to objectivity? Is the need to belong to a group so strong that it overrides one's common sense? I don't always agree with liberal or conservative columnists, but at least the conservative columnists are often quick to lay bare the failings of their own party. It is the oblivious nature of the Democrats that has put them in this position. They cannot conceive that anyone else outside their party has a good idea, nor are they willing to listen. Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid have demonstrated that time after time, and President Obama has only attempted to work with the senators and representatives of the other parties by giving them an opportunity to agree with him. The bailouts (which both parties are responsible for, but Barney Frank and Chris Dodd oversaw the banking committees...), the panic the Democrats created during 2008 that led people to stop buying and resulted in the failure of many companies, more people to lose their jobs and then their homes, the desire to offer amnesty to illegal aliens that often do not pay taxes because they are paid in cash but have access to the many entitlement programs through falsified documentation, the snubbing and investigation of Arizona officials trying to make their state safe, the healthcare plan that no one wanted and which is loaded with things like a tax on every home sale and other taxes, the failure of the Justice Dept to investigate voter fraud during the primaries in 2008 by intimidation at the polls (hurt Hillary, your fav), and the aim of the Democrats to control almost every aspect of our lives, try to demonize anyone who has had success financially (although they exempt themselves from that picture), are just a few of the many reasons they are doing so poorly in the polls. The Democrats claim to support the rights of women (and so do you), but berate Meg Whitman and Carly Fiorina. How better to stay in power than to exert power over the pesky voters they have to rely on to stay in office, and to regulate the free market out of existence and to keep the big corporations donating campaign funds into their pockets. No one seemed to worry in 2008 where the Democrats were getting their money, but the Demoncrats are waiving the flag about the funding sources for the Republicans. Are the Republicans better? Not necessarily, but I think that many of them are getting a wake up call too by the new candidates entering the field. At least the runaway bus to Abilene will stop before it goes off the cliff by voting for the Republicans on Tuesday, and maybe the Senate and House of Representatives will begin to represent the people of the USA again.
Comment: #7
Posted by: Elaine
Sun Oct 31, 2010 1:34 PM
What divides us is a chasm as big as the grand Canyon. How is it possible to "work together" when one side is for the Republic and the other is for Socialism/Facism/Marxist? It's truly a fight for the existance of our nation.
We is Joe McCarthy when we need him?
Comment: #8
Posted by: Early
Mon Nov 1, 2010 7:46 AM
It's Wednesday, the elections are over and California has sealed its doom. It's time to negotiate with Mexico.
Hate to see you go.
Comment: #9
Posted by: Early
Wed Nov 3, 2010 7:36 AM
Re: Dennis
While you're so concerned about Bork and the serial stalker Clarence Thomas, why did you omit the trashing of President Clinton for 10 years - which continues today. Not to mention Al Gore, John Kerry, and any Democrat who has the nerve to run for public office. You can take your hypocrisy and put it where the sun don't shine.
Comment: #10
Posted by: Winslow
Sun Nov 28, 2010 5:57 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Susan Estrich
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

22 Apr 2009 The Hundred Days

27 Jan 2012 Clintonesque

23 Feb 2011 A Mother's Search for Meaning