opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Susan Estrich
12 Feb 2016
Why We Do It This Way

Who in the world, one of my friends asked, could ever have come up with such a ridiculous way to nominate a president? … Read More.

10 Feb 2016
Why Women Should Be for Hillary

There is one reason young women should support Hillary Clinton for president. It happens to be, in my … Read More.

5 Feb 2016
Donald Trump: Sore Loser

It was the shortest speech anyone can remember him giving. He was clearly in a state of disbelief. How could … Read More.

So Much for the Student Vote


College students won't be voting in the Iowa caucus this year. Or, at least, most of those who would have won't now, and those who still can might not know about it yet. No matter how you look at it, it's a mess.

The problem is the calendar. The Iowa caucuses used to be in late January, which meant students who attend college in Iowa could caucus in the cities and towns where they go to school. Since you have to register at least 11 days in advance, that left time to do everything after Christmas — or to register before break and vote when you got back. When this campaign began, all of the candidates had college coordinators and were making appearances on campuses in the hopes that it would encourage students to register to vote and get involved.

Now, it's hardly worth the effort. The caucuses have been moved to January 3, so Iowa can stay ahead of New Hampshire, which wants to stay ahead of South Carolina, not to mention Michigan. The problem is that students who go to college in Iowa aren't back by January 3 and, in most cases, couldn't be if they wanted to because the dorms aren't even open yet.

You can't caucus by absentee ballot. It just doesn't work that way in a process that requires people to go to different corners of the room depending on which candidate they support, and then regroup if their chosen candidate doesn't have enough people to meet the threshold for a delegate in his or her corner, and so on until the final division. Even in this virtual world, it's hard to figure how you could do that without being there. And it wouldn't be Iowa.

But is it Iowa if you disenfranchise an entire category of voters in the never-ending quest to be first?

There was, in fact, no great scheme by the rules writers in the sky that deemed Iowa should go first because it represents a shining light of democracy in action. It was an accident of scheduling back in 1976, caused by conflicts at the convention center months later that, working backward, required the precinct caucuses to be moved forward. But once Iowa became the launching ground for Jimmy Carter's long-shot candidacy, and once Iowans realized what a good thing they had going in terms of candidate attention, media coverage and the general boost both to the economy and the issues agenda that comes from going first, the fight was on to preserve that special status.

There's an entire school of thought that says agriculture policy in the United States has been distorted for the last 30 years by promises made by candidates to win votes in Iowa. But that's another story.

What Iowa sold — to the rules committees, the media and the rest of the country — was not its peculiar issues positioning, but its special brand of civic democracy. Iowa might not be representative of the diversity that is America, but it was said to represent a tradition of commitment to politics, of real participation and small "d" democracy that made it a better place than most to "vet" the candidates up close before they move on to the bigger, more impersonal, less participatory arenas where campaigns are won and lost mostly because of money and media.

But how do you square that tradition with a decision to sacrifice college students to the altar of going first?

Of course, students who live in Iowa and go to school out-of-state, or in another part of the state, can caucus with their parents on January 3. But that assumes they knew enough to register to vote at their parents' addresses at least 11 days earlier — that is, the minute they got off the train or plane or out of the car. It assumes they didn't register in the place where they go to school and, considering themselves adults, now may think they "live." It assumes more than most of us who spend our time trying to convince young people — the demographic with the lowest turnout rates going in — to vote would ever choose to assume, at least voluntarily.

I believe colleges have an obligation to teach their students civic literacy in the same way we teach computer literacy, to ensure that our students know as much about how to get involved as they do about how to go online. I spend a great deal of time giving speeches on campuses, and this is often my subject. I regale them with tales of my early days, doing get-out-the-vote in Dade County, Fla., where the heavily senior citizen population will literally go by stretcher if that's what it takes to cast a ballot. Why do you think Social Security is the sacred cow, the third rail, in American politics? It's because old people vote and young people don't, I tell them. And it's your own fault.

Except in Iowa, that is.

To find out more about Susan Estrich and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at



4 Comments | Post Comment
If the students live in Iowa, they will be able to vote in that states primary. If they live out of state, they can return home to vote in their state's primary. How have they been disenfranchised? Perhaps they have been inconvenienced. Your hyperbole doesn't help you make your point.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Mike
Tue Nov 27, 2007 11:46 AM
So the complaint here is that Iowa rescheduled its caucus date for a time that's inconvenient to students who don't live there full time.

I have one question: So what?
Comment: #2
Posted by: Rudy C
Tue Nov 27, 2007 2:34 PM
Since when can college students register to vote where they go to school? If you go to UF and pay out of state fees the first semester because you are from NY, why not register to vote in Gainesville? That way, the next year you can claim to be a Florida resident and pay in-state fees for the next 3 and a half years. The reason you can't do that is, it is illegal. So, you see, legally registered voters of a college age are registered in the city they are most likely to be in on January 3rd, namely Mom and Dad's house. Talk to some college administrators and see if this is the case in Iowa. If it is write a clarification in your next column. Thanks.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Donna
Wed Nov 28, 2007 11:01 AM
College students cannot register to vote in the city where they attend college unless that is where they live before becoming a student. If a person from NY attends the University of Florida as an out of state student for one semester they cannot register to vote in Gainesville as a Florida resident. If they could, no one would ever pay out of state fees at any university for more than one semester. They would argue: I moved there; I registered to vote; I'm a local resident. This being the case I would think the students in Iowa would be registered to vote in the location they will be on January 3rd, which is Mom and Dad's house. Is this true or not?
Comment: #4
Posted by: Donna
Wed Nov 28, 2007 4:15 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Susan Estrich
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Deb Saunders
Debra J. SaundersUpdated 14 Feb 2016
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 14 Feb 2016
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 13 Feb 2016

16 Apr 2010 A Quarterback's Bad Calls

8 Jan 2016 Here Comes Cruz

31 Jul 2009 An Educational Moment