creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Susan Estrich
25 May 2012
The Next Education President

Mitt Romney is right about one thing: Too many American children do receive what he this week called a … Read More.

23 May 2012
Susan Mary Riley, We Will Miss You

It's her voice that I keep hearing in my head. "Susan," she would say, in that quiet, commanding … Read More.

18 May 2012
Boring

When my kids were young, about the worst thing they could say about something was that it was capital-b BORRRING.… Read More.

Shaking (It) Out

Share Comment

As I write this, some 8.5 million of my fellow Californians have just finished practicing what to do in the likely event of a major earthquake. October 20th at 10:20 a.m. was designated the Great California ShakeOut earthquake drill, the moment when you "Drop, Cover and Hold On."

Luckily, my building didn't participate. Last week's fire drill was enough.

There was a time when I didn't feel this way. When I first moved here, I was somewhat terrified of earthquakes — and utterly perplexed. The somewhat terrified part should be easy to understand. Some would say it is the rational response to a real threat of devastating consequence. That is especially true if you take that fear and channel it into preparation: Ensure that your house is bolted, your chimney not cracked, your supply of food and water adequate and not expired, and your trunk always packed with a pair of thick-soled sneakers (in case you have to walk over glass) and a blanket, — or better yet, an earthquake kit.

I already knew about ducking and covering and holding on. The big danger of an earthquake is that something will fall on you, so you get under the desk and hold on, or go to the most stable place, which is a doorway. You keep slippers by your bed so you won't have to step on glass. And then you stay where you are so things won't fall on you, and you count to keep yourself calm.

I knew all this, but the minute the house started shaking during the 1994 Northridge quake, I was out of bed, barefoot, running down the glass-strewn hall to check on my sleeping 1- and 4-year-olds.

Those were the days when I was really somewhat terrified. For nursery school, you had to pack a little bag for your child with a favorite toy or comfort object and a picture of the family to have with them if an earthquake made it impossible for them to get home or be picked up. You had to provide an out-of-state contact number the school could call.

You had to think, or I did, every day when you dropped your child off, or when I found myself hours away, how I would get to my children if there were a sudden quake. I'd look up every time I was stuck in traffic under an underpass (which in Los Angeles is a lot) and think about what I would do if it suddenly started shaking.

And what perplexed me, really mystified me, was how everyone around me didn't seem terrified at all. Parents who grew up here were nonchalant about dropping off the bags. I'd throw a bag into the trunk of a friend's car and find a long lost pair of sneakers in the corner, if that.

"Another beautiful day in Pompeii," I would say, and people would just laugh. Don't you even know where your gas turn-off is, I would ask people, shocked. They would look at me like I was from another planet, even if the answer was mostly yes. Was I really standing there thinking about earthquakes? Yes.

And then it happened to me. I just stopped worrying about it. Whether it's denial or acceptance, I'm not sure. It's probably some of both. But I joined the crowd that shrugs their shoulders and tallies up all those weather-related death statistics from the rest of the country, which provide a sad but nonetheless effective way of diminishing your fear of earthquakes — rationally, no less. I might have the stuff in my trunk, but I don't think so. Of course, I mean to, but as for thinking about it, why worry about what you can't control?

I'm not moving to Austin. (I actually thought about it after Northridge.)

I can't be with my children every minute. And they're grown now and don't need a comfort object. I'm bolting my house to the foundation. What you can't predict, you shouldn't worry about.

I sometimes wonder why I can't apply my earthquake strategy to the other constant fears in my life, such as cancer, and find peace in reasonable steps like the sneakers and regular exercise. It doesn't seem to work. But earthquakes?

I showed up at work today at 10:30 so I wouldn't have to crawl under my desk. Why worry? The clouds are clearing, and it's going to be another beautiful day here in Pompeii.

To find out more about Susan Estrich and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM


Comments

5 Comments | Post Comment
It would take more than the lack of earthqualkes to get me to live in the beautiful but lost state of Kalifornia.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Early
Fri Oct 21, 2011 5:01 AM
Estrich already has applied her earthquake strategy to the rest of her life. She just does not know it. By being a schill for liberalism, progressivism, abortion, that POS Obama and the like she has stopped caring about the preservation of Americanism, of liberty, of constitutional governance and instead has surrendered herself to the tyranny and moral decay that is part and parcel of liberalism.
Comment: #2
Posted by: joseph wright
Fri Oct 21, 2011 8:51 AM
So in a nutshell, Joe, you are saying you don't like Susan Estrich. You say that pretty much every day.

I appreciate your consistency.
Comment: #3
Posted by: capiscan
Sun Oct 23, 2011 10:50 AM
Re: capiscan Actually I do not care about Estrich any which way. I neither like her nor dislike her. What is worse than liking or disliking someone personally is that they mean nothing. Estrich means nothing to me and I truly mean nothing. Her writings, however are useful, because each column is replete with opportunity to expose the contradictions in what Estrich would portray herself to be and by dint of that liberalism to be and the curse upon mankind that liberals and liberalism truly are.
Comment: #4
Posted by: joseph wright
Sun Oct 23, 2011 3:36 PM
I don't care for Susan's liberal thinking most of the time. However, some of her columns are sheer genius and this is what keeps me coming back. If she'd just stick to articles "Shaking it Out" and things like that she'd be super great. I hope she keeps up the good work.29857
Comment: #5
Posted by: gary
Mon Oct 24, 2011 10:11 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Susan Estrich
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

5 Mar 2010 The Courage of His Convictions

28 Jul 2010 Her First Demonstration

12 Dec 2007 Early Answers