opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Susan Estrich
12 Feb 2016
Why We Do It This Way

Who in the world, one of my friends asked, could ever have come up with such a ridiculous way to nominate a president? … Read More.

10 Feb 2016
Why Women Should Be for Hillary

There is one reason young women should support Hillary Clinton for president. It happens to be, in my … Read More.

5 Feb 2016
Donald Trump: Sore Loser

It was the shortest speech anyone can remember him giving. He was clearly in a state of disbelief. How could … Read More.

Race in the Race


It was probably inevitable. A woman running against a black: How could gender and race not be an issue? Even if she was running as the most experienced candidate and he was running a campaign to transcend race, dynamite ultimately explodes.

The gender issue exploded in New Hampshire through her tears. If she didn't cry, she came close; her eyes welled up. That, on its own, might not have been enough if the guys — from her opponent John Edwards to the scores of reporters and pundits with nothing else to talk about — hadn't jumped all over her for it. And then the backlash hit, with women moving to her side in numbers large enough to make all the pre-election polls turn out to have been wrong. I can criticize my mother, but you can't. Women can say they don't like Hillary, but it's quite another thing when a bunch of guys suggest she's not tough enough to be president. If Hillary isn't tough, who is?

Now the race issue has exploded, triggered by Hillary's comment that "it took a president" to enact the civil rights laws, which was clearly not intended as a slight on Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., but as another effort to stay on the message of rhetoric versus experience, talk versus action. That was her theme in the closing days of the New Hampshire campaign. It was, in fact, Obama's credentials she was calling into account, not King's. But the Obama people, among others, seized on the comment to fan a few flames.

Who could blame them? It's one thing to transcend race when you're running in states that have long been criticized for being too white to represent accurately the diversity of the Democratic Party, and quite another to do so when you're heading to South Carolina, where half of the Democratic voters are African-American, or Nevada, which was allowed to move its caucuses earlier in the process, ahead of Super Duper Tuesday, precisely because of its significant Hispanic population.

The problem is that playing with fire, as Clinton and Obama have been doing in the latest edition of the race war, risks everyone getting burned.

As Jesse Jackson's candidacy amply demonstrated in both 1984 and 1988, there are certain states where being the "black candidate," as he was, is a decided advantage in a Democratic primary. It's worth remembering that in the first Super Tuesday go-round, back in 1984, when the Southern states moved up together in the hopes of influencing the nomination process in a conservative direction, the unintended consequence was to give a boost to the Jackson effort: He won more states on that Super Tuesday than either of his white opponents.

But, as Michael Dukakis' 1988 success over Jackson demonstrated, there are even more states where being the white candidate running against the black candidate — even if no one ever says it quite that way, and we were careful not to — is all you need to do to coast to the nomination. Americans may or may not be ready to elect a president who happens to be black, but if race is the issue, rather than something the candidate transcends, the odds get much longer.

That's why Obama was smart to extend the olive branch on the race issue, as he did this week, and try to end this particular squabble. It's not just because it's ridiculous to accuse the Clintons, of all people, of racial insensitivity. It's because, in the end, it's not a fight Obama can win, even if it is one Hillary can lose. The genius of the Obama campaign has been the candidate's ability to reach out to white voters in a way that makes it possible to imagine that the country might actually be ready for a candidate who happens to be black.

Fighting about race is a reminder of just how far we have come, and of how easy it would be to slip back.

To find out more about Susan Estrich and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at



1 Comments | Post Comment
Atten: Susan Estrich
I read your artical in the Amarillo Globe News dated 1/16/08. Entitlted "GOP can't get behind its frontrunners" Why wasn't Ron Paul mentioned? Look at his record. No one wants to give him any publicity.
Have you read any thing about him. Have you read any thing about his policies? He supports the Constitution. He wants to end the I.R.S., Stop central bankers inflation tax, stop financial dependency on foreigh goverment, unconstitutional spending leading us to bankruptcy, protect our privacy and stop the national I.D. card (this card lets the goverment know where you are and what your doing at all times) protect our constitutional rights and end the Patriot act( This act allows the goverment to use wire taps without judicial oversight moniter private internet usage, allows the federal goverment to search a persons home, office and propery without the persons knowledge)
and bring our troops home. Today the threat to our liberity and privacy is real. What other canditates have offered us this kind of hope. We are going down the drain fast. We have a chance to put a man in office that can God willing pull this country out of the toilet so to speak. Why won't the media give this man a chance doesn't he have the right to be heard? Isn't it his constitutional right. Don't the people have a right to see there's a man for the people. Please do whats right and give this man a chance to prove he's the one that will clean up the mess were in.
Thank you for your time
Debbie Diller
Ron Paul for President campaign
Comment: #1
Posted by: Debbie Diller
Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:55 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Susan Estrich
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Deb Saunders
Debra J. SaundersUpdated 14 Feb 2016
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 14 Feb 2016
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 13 Feb 2016

15 Jan 2013 The Promise and the Pontificators

9 Dec 2015 The Trump Question

3 Apr 2009 Police Work