creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Susan Estrich
15 Feb 2012
That's What Friends Are For

Here we go again: a tragedy in the music world, a tragedy waiting to happen that did. Disturbing headlines … Read More.

10 Feb 2012
What Happened to Newt and Mitt?

Newt's easy. While all of us on the Democratic side were playing "root for Newt," Republicans were … Read More.

8 Feb 2012
Chasing Equality

Tuesday's ruling by a panel of three judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit … Read More.

On Her Shoulders, In Her Shoes

Share Comment

Ruth Bader Ginsburg is small in stature, but she has very big shoulders. Alongside a generation of women lawyers, I stand on them, with gratitude and pride. The news that the only woman on the United States Supreme Court has been hospitalized for surgery for pancreatic cancer brings an opportune moment to say thank you.

Pancreatic is bad. No question about that. But as Steve Jobs, Patrick Swayze and my dear friend Nancy Daly Riordan have proved, it is not, or at least not necessarily, the six-month death sentence it once was. Hopefully, Justice Ginsburg will have many productive years left. The thoughts and prayers of a nation, and especially its legion of women lawyers, are with her.

It may help her recovery, if only a little, to know how important she has been to us. Ginsburg came to Harvard Law as a student in the days when you could literally count the number of women students on two hands. She was one of nine women in the class of 1956, a year behind her husband, Martin. She was a member of the Harvard law review for a year — one of the first women to be selected by the group that, 33 years later, elected Barack Obama as its president. And all the while she cared for her baby daughter and ailing husband, who spent his third year of law school fighting cancer while Ruth covered his classes. When he graduated and accepted a job in New York, she took her third year at Columbia Law School, where she graduated tied for first in her class.

But as "a woman, a Jew and a mother to boot," neither the law firms nor the appellate judges came calling with job offers. Ginsburg clerked for U.S. District Judge Edmund Palmieri before joining the faculty of Rutgers Law School and later becoming the first tenured woman at Columbia Law School.

She not only taught sex discrimination law, she created it, as the first head of the ACLU Women's Rights Project and the author of main and friend-of-the-court briefs on virtually every important sex discrimination case of the 1970s.

She walked the walk and talked the talk. She hid her second pregnancy from her colleagues lest it cost her tenure. She balanced motherhood, marriage and career, and insisted on equality. She was not as liberal as some liberal judges would have liked, not as radical as some radical feminists thought she should be, but her commitment to equality was, and is, unwavering.

In the (can it be?) 30 years since I have been teaching law and in the 25 that I have been teaching "her" cases in my own sex discrimination classes, I have taught and moderated and participated in the heated debates about whether women should seek equality with men as the standard, or whether our goal should be to recognize that in many ways women are different and those differences must be acknowledged if women are to fulfill their potential.

I remember the especially vigorous debates within the ACLU itself about the issue of maternity leave and whether it advanced women's cause or set us back to have "special" rules, even seemingly generous ones, based on motherhood. The fact that there were so many women sitting around the table debating these questions is, in many ways, Ginsburg's greatest legacy. She has always been a woman to promote other women, offering her slim shoulders to any and all.

I wish her many more productive and fulfilling years on the Court. And when it is her time to step down, it is in no small measure thanks to her that such legal giants as Harvard Dean and Solicitor General-nominee Elena Kagan will be there to fill her shoes. Ruth Bader Ginsburg is a small woman with very big shoes, who has labored a lifetime to ensure there will be women to fill them.

To find out more about Susan Estrich and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


Comments

6 Comments | Post Comment
Ruth Bader Ginsburg is a far left liberal. I don't care about the history of her, her life, etc. What I do care about it her voting record how it affect America. From that standpoint, on net, she has been a negative.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Darek
Sat Feb 7, 2009 9:19 PM
Some of her stances: "Government should fund abortion and childbirth equally." Translated, the government should fund the life and death of newborns equally. I'm not all that crazy about the death thing. "Boy Scouts should be required to accept gay scoutmasters." I guess she hasn't read anything about the right to assemble. I personally who never sent my boy off to the scouts if I knew her was off on trips being supervised by a gay scoutmaster. If you think something is wrong with that, that's fine, but it's my right to make that decision. "Disallow taxpayer funding for parochial school materials." It's ok to fund the killing of babies, but not ok to teach them about God. "Votes with liberal bloc against states' rights." Is that right, AGAINST states rights... hmm, she should have paid better attention in law school, gone to a better one, or maybe just short circuit the process and actually read the constitution.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Jeff
Sat Feb 7, 2009 9:32 PM
Ma'am; while I might agree that Mrs. Ginsburg was decent enough, the law is something that does not work, and the Supreme Court has never worked.... I would bet, that if you took the whole office, all nine, and any who wanted to tag along, and stuffed them in a pillow case like a litter of kittens, and tossed them off a bridge, more real people would be upset by my use of the metaphore than the reality...I think we could manage just fine with less legal aristocrats, and more democracy... We might hurt each other for a while until we learned the proper limits of it; but then we would be fine... And I do mean fine... Super fine...Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #3
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Sun Feb 8, 2009 8:02 PM
Wishes for a speedy recouperation and please get back to the bench quickly. i have the greatest respect for you, supreme court judge and hope you enjoy as many years tenure on the bench as you choose to.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Scruz
Sun Feb 8, 2009 9:07 PM
Susan Estrich

I have viewed you on t. v. stations. I am NOT IMPRESSED. So I say Nothing. Blagh Blagh Blagh
Comment: #5
Posted by: Eileen Mullen
Mon Feb 9, 2009 6:25 PM
Thank you Ms. Estrich, thank you for reminding us of those that put aside retrogressive minds (like some of the authors of the comments you received) and ploughed ahead to open doors for those of us that followed. I thank Judge Ginsberg, my daughters thank her, and my granddaughters will thank her too.
Comment: #6
Posted by: cecilia briceno
Thu Feb 12, 2009 8:08 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Susan Estrich
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Lawrence Kudlow
Lawrence KudlowUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Joe Conason
Joe ConasonUpdated 16 Feb 2012

28 Oct 2009 Vaccine Supply and the Public Option

11 Jul 2007 The Politics Of Privilege

5 Mar 2008 Blame the Supreme Court