creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Susan Estrich
25 May 2012
The Next Education President

Mitt Romney is right about one thing: Too many American children do receive what he this week called a … Read More.

23 May 2012
Susan Mary Riley, We Will Miss You

It's her voice that I keep hearing in my head. "Susan," she would say, in that quiet, commanding … Read More.

18 May 2012
Boring

When my kids were young, about the worst thing they could say about something was that it was capital-b BORRRING.… Read More.

Guts and Glory

Share Comment

No Republicans supported Medicare in the House of Representatives until it reached the floor. It came out of the House Ways and Means and Rules committees on strict party-line votes. On the procedural vote that brought Medicare to a vote, exactly 10 Republicans voted for the bill. Only when it was clear that Democrats had the votes did it become a "bipartisan" bill, passing with the support of 70 Republicans and 237 Democrats.

In the Senate, 13 Republicans voted for Medicare; the rest of the votes came from Democrats.

Today, Medicare is the "third rail" in American politics. Republicans were, in a word, wrong — wrong on the policy and wrong on the politics. They remained the minority party in the House for the next three decades.

Could the same thing happen with President Obama's health care reform bill? I think it could. Everyone has been fixated on the risks to Democrats — whether or not it's good politics, whether they will pay in November. The political calculations tend to turn on which changes go into effect first and whether people will see benefits — or costs — by the time they vote in November.

Will parents who can keep their kids on their health insurance until they are 26 (a biggie for the middle class) reward the president? What about the fact that kids can't be excluded for pre-existing conditions? Those changes will happen quickly, while the additional taxes on the wealthiest Americans will not go into effect until 2014. Will the president be blamed for higher premiums that were escalating before the bill's passage, or will Democrats get credit for new incentives for small businesses to provide coverage? Time will tell.

But those are not the only factors to be considered.

There is, first of all, the question of conviction. I'm not an expert on health care policy. I didn't support Obama in the primaries. I'm as worried as the next person about how we're going to pay for it.

But there is something I do understand and respect, and that is principle and courage in politics.

Obama and Nancy Pelosi have earned my respect and, I suspect, the respect of many others for displaying precisely those qualities under enormous fire. Against the loud voices of naysayers, against the drumbeat of polls, they did what they set out to do.

People say they want politicians to have the courage of their convictions, until they do. Pundits criticize political leaders for living by the polls, until they don't. Obama ran for president on the promise to enact comprehensive health care reform, and then he risked his presidency to do just that. Pelosi never backed down.

Sure, there were back-room deals and promises and compromises. Politics was played in Washington. In Las Vegas, they still gamble. But at the end of the day, the sausage was made, as promised. Whether or not you support this president and this bill, you have to admire the guts and determination of this president and this speaker. The president showed guts. In my book, he deserves the glory.

Republicans showed no guts. Not a single Republican has had the courage to cross the aisle. Not a single Republican has been willing to do anything but "just say no." "No" is not the answer to the health care crisis. "No" will not help parents of sick children; or parents of unemployed 20-somethings; or middle-class folks who can't find the good jobs that bring health insurance and can't afford the astronomical rates found in the individual market even for those without pre-existing conditions.

Republicans took the easy way out, as they continue to do this week, playing procedural games in the hopes of accomplishing exactly nothing. As Democrats have scrambled to fix the bill, to meet objections, to compromise even on issues many of us hold near and dear (abortion, the public option, etc.), Republicans have been willing to compromise on nothing.

And for this they expect to be rewarded by voters? I wouldn't be so sure. No guts, no glory. As for me, I'll take a party of conviction and courage over a bunch of naysayers and do-nothings any day.

To find out more about Susan Estrich and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

24 Comments | Post Comment
Dear Susan Estrich Hitler had guts. David Koresh had guts. Hugo Chávez has guts. The Emperor of Japan had the guts to attack Pearl Harbor. Need I go on? Having the “guts" to ignore the people of this country and assault private enterprise is not commendable. Shame on you, Susan.
Comment: #1
Posted by: David Henricks
Tue Mar 23, 2010 11:59 PM
I respectfully disagree. The goal of reforming healthcare could have been reached without this bill. The republicans had a workable plan which was widely ignored. This is more intrusion into our lives by the ever growing federal branch of government. The growing bill for all of the free handouts will eventually sink our country. Medicare is a disaster,social security,and the looming financial needs to service the feelgood benefits will suck up all available money and it will still not be enough. Free enterprise made this country great.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Michael Bonnecarrere
Wed Mar 24, 2010 5:20 AM
Republicans had no guts to cross the aisle? I would have been angry had they. NOBODY has the right to tell me I HAVE to buy anything and it HAS to be what the government deems acceptable. I swear on 1/1/2014 I am cancelling my health insurance. Close to 17,000 IRS (big brothers) to watch me monthly?
159 goveernment agencies are to be created to dictate how privae businesses operate? They will charge what the governments says they can, cover services the government says they have to, cover people the government says I have to. THAT is a government takeover. The government now owns 50% of our economy and that's wrong. BANKS+GM+AIG+HEALTH INSURANCE = 50%.
Now we will dump people who allegedly can't afford to pay insurance into Medicaid/Medicare and burden th state with the cost. Pass that right on to people. So, getting up every day working hard got me nothing but a redistribution of "wealth". After they provid amnesty to 12 million illegals my hard work will subsidize their healthcare.
We do need to do something about pre-existing conditions and some of the insurance abuses that do happen. This was not the way to do it. People who did not have what you call "courage" to cross th aisle do not agree with this bill or this way to handle it. They pick out those random sob stories to try to make us feel oh so sorry. Yes our government should help them but not trample all over the rights of the rest of us.
No, any courage was demonstrated by the 34 Democrats who voted against the bill - unless they only did so because Nance said it was OK. Courage was not Stupak. It was not all the other Democrats who took bribes with MY money rather than standing with THEIR convictions no matter what the pressure.
A lot of us normally politically neutral are fired up. Obama and his administration did not do this because of his convictions. This was a power grab. Going for the win. Damn the people.
Remember this - while 32 million more people will have health insurance it doesn't mean they will have health CARE. Now, my health CARE is going to be compromised. However, the bill also states there will be incentives for those who train "underrepresented" groups. Instead of having the best doctors in the world - we are going to get the ones that fill a quota.
Dear Susan you are so off the mark. As David says guts and passing an agenda item just to save your own ass isn't commendable. It's at th expense of the majority of people.l
Comment: #3
Posted by: Lisa
Wed Mar 24, 2010 5:23 AM
"I'm as worried as the next person about how we're going to pay for it."


Don;t you think that is a bit of a concern. I think that should have been answered before even moving forward.

Lame commentary Susan.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Bob
Wed Mar 24, 2010 5:27 AM
It's difficult to swallow that an educated person such as Susan Estrich would think that a one party government (our current government) is great! Don't they have that in Cuba? That Castro sures has guts!
Comment: #5
Posted by: Early
Wed Mar 24, 2010 7:00 AM
I actually enjoyed reading many of your articles Susan and respected your opinion. However, with this latest article I've lost all respect for you, your opinion is so biased it makes me sick to my stomach. I can't honestly understand how people can see this as couragous, I'm scared to death for my children and their future in this country.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Greeper
Wed Mar 24, 2010 9:25 AM
Susan ~ this had very little to do with the courage of ones convictions. This had little to do with real health care/insurance reform. This was about the 'health' of this presidency. Already...holes are being found in the hastily put together legislation. Hefty political capital was spent on this...even according to the left.
Yes...there are some changes for the better. Yet so many questions remain...even among the Obama faithful.
I get tired frankly of all the rhetoric...from both sides of the aisle. As I also got tired of discussing this with my more liberal friends...who only cared about the 'end' game...and not the nuts and bolts of how we get there.
Regarding Medicare...its initial intentions were noble...like most entitlements. However...what is has morphed into would send the creators of the Medicare legislation screaming into the night/rolling over in their graves.
Medicare is in the process of melting down with a $38 trillion unfunded liability...with $8-10 trillion in the next couple of years.
Social Security currently is only in the first stages of melting down with $8 trillion unfunded liabilities.
Most states are being crushed by entitlement spending that keeps increasing while revenues shrink. The added burden to the states by shifting fiscal responsibility to Medicaid will just push the states to be further dependent on bailouts by the Federal Gov.
At some point the well will run dry. One only needs to look at the bond markets to see much concern about our debt as a nation.
Comment: #7
Posted by: smallmouthbass
Wed Mar 24, 2010 9:51 AM
Susan, This bill had everything to do with power over the people. Obama used the Saul Alinsky style---never back down. This government now owns the auto companies, the banks and now they will soon break the insurance companies. Good bye free enterprize and our way of life as we have always known it. Power and control over the people. That's what this is about. Socialism!
Comment: #8
Posted by: vonnie bates
Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:51 PM
More talking points pablum from someone who'll likely be dead and gone when it comes time to pay for this monstrosity. Instead of merely admitting you're concerned for how we are going to pay for this, why not act like an adult who has to manage their finances responsibly, and admit that if we don't have the answer to that question before enacting a Trillion dollar bill, we shouldn't walk in blind faith and hope that it works out.

Courage and conviction are admirable traits, but they don't pay the bills... especially when the fuzzy math used to justify this expenditure would have made Enron and Bernie Madoff blush. Your love affair with Obama has blinded you to sound reasoning, Susan.

While the 'party of no' is a cute and worn out cliché, many of us independents are happy that some politicians had the courage of their convictions to not spend now, and figure out how we're going to pay for it later.
Comment: #9
Posted by: Michael
Thu Mar 25, 2010 4:37 AM
Reading a few of Susan's comments shows some proof of what I suspect is the case in regards to the reasons behind the teabagger extremist passion

They live in their own little world and talk to no one who disagrees.

Their comments where they 'speak for the nation" 'speak for everyone" are as ridiculous as they are pretentious.

They know they're making up 90% of their 'facts' but think the rest of the nation actually believes their lies.

Not hardly.

Such deceptive lying practices turn 98% of voters totally off, especially ones so rediculous it's an insult to one's intelligence to expect anyone to believe it for a second.

For example, someone would have to be a political idiot to believe president obama is socialist.

His healthcare act keeps insurance companies in charge.

He's continuing many of Bush's war initiatives.

Come November 2010, they're in for a big disappointment. The majority that votes and elects people are not going to choose hysterical liars who will stoop to new lows to 'win' victories that hurt everyday Americans and the nation.
Comment: #10
Posted by: jonathan seer
Thu Mar 25, 2010 7:15 AM
Re: jonathan seer
Of course. That is the only way many are able to explain what is happening in this country. The change that has happened as a result of the 2008 presidential election is not the change the left had in mind. It has awoken the sleeping giant that is the majority of Americans. This has the left petrified. Rightly so. Politicians (both sides of the aisle) should no longer believe that We the People don't care about the process.
Sort of like all the liberal educators that are now screaming like stuck pigs over the Texas school book issues. These are the same liberals that have had their way for over 2 generations. Now...that sleeping giant has awoken and they are angry...calling the Texas board that reviews and approves content in books the 'Texas Taliban' and the like.
I have never called Obama a socialist. However...I'd suggest you looking into the many parameters that define socialism.
If it walks like one...talks like one...looks like one...you get my drift.
No extreme passion for any particular movement...other then wanting my country to be on a sustainable path.
One universal truth in D.C. is the imcompetency inherent in massive beauracracies.
And maybe good intentions are sufficient for you...but they are not for me.
And a majority (plurality) of Americans agree with V.P. Joe Biden. This is a f**king big deal.
Not a Tea Party member...but I am more closely associated to their beliefs then to those of the left/progressives/democrats.
I think I'll go dip some earl grey...in your honor...
Comment: #11
Posted by: smallmouthbass
Thu Mar 25, 2010 8:35 AM
Susan,
Got any idea where California will come up with 3+ billion a year to fund this monstrosity. If so, contact the State Governmentr.
Comment: #12
Posted by: David Kidd
Thu Mar 25, 2010 8:44 AM
Ms. Estrich -
I seriously disagree with your premise. As mentioned in other comments, there were workable reforms to the health care issues that had wide bipartisan support. This overarching bill was not needed to be crammed down our throats. You did not seem to think that Bush standing by his convictions in the wake of serious opposition to the Iraq war was a positive for him. We may not have agreed with the war, but he stood by his convictions. Did he earn your respect?
Impeached judge, now congressman, Alcee Hastings admitted they made up the rules as they went along. John Dingall commented in an interview that it took a long time, but now with the healthcare bill they can "control the people." Joe Biden said "We will control the insurance companies."
The bill specifically excludes Congress from the provisions. Even they do not want to live with the consequences of the bill. The bill does not address pre-existing conditions for children until 2014. Oops - they need to put in ANOTHER fix. The bill does not address increasing costs - even the CBO says premiums will go up - primarily because we will be required to purchase "approved" plans that will cover more than most of us need.
Were you so blinded by the rhetoric that you missed the point of the bill? This was not a bill to improve health care. Passing the common ground provisions discussed in the "health care summit" would have done more than this bill.
The bill is to give more government control over the lives of people. It is designed to take away personal responsibility and give more access to personal information of the population. The only reason for that access is control. Biden said it, Dingell said it, the bill itself says it.
Comment: #13
Posted by: lvtaxman
Thu Mar 25, 2010 8:47 AM
Dear Ms. Estrich:
Thank you for your column. I totally agree with you. I think that most Americans and even some tea party people will see that the Right has been lying to them about this reform. It is great and a long time coming. The Democrats showed courage and toughness and the Republicans looked ugly and united against progress. I believe that Democrats and Independents will come out in droves to support this law and the lawmakers who made it possible. The Republicans are stuck with pictures and nasty comments by their leaders like Sarah, Rush, Glenn, Karl, Dick, Lynn and the poor, lost John McCain, who not only lost the presidential election, but also whatever was left of his integrity.
Thank you, again.
Sincerely,
John Kaye
Comment: #14
Posted by: dezilahy
Thu Mar 25, 2010 10:50 AM
He had a 54 vote majority in the house and a super majority in the Senate. Reagan had guts as he got things done with a democratic Congress
Comment: #15
Posted by: David May
Thu Mar 25, 2010 11:00 AM
The cornhusker kickback, the Louisana purchase, hospitals in conn., medicare in Florida, money for shopeck, I guess tanning companies have no lobby group
INTEGRITY???????????????????????
Comment: #16
Posted by: David May
Thu Mar 25, 2010 11:05 AM
I am thrilled this bill passed. I know it is something to start with but I would prefer to see universal health care where the insurance companies do not get to profit from anyone's illness or death! That part makes me angry. However, one has to begin somewhere! And Nancy Pelosi and other Democrats and Obama - did carry at least part of it off. Now I want to see more people have real access to health care and I note that in most countries with universal health care - and I am a physician who SEES what no health coverage can do (I have so many sad stories and the GOP just says no, they do not care!) - it costs less per capita. Canada pays about one half of what the US does in taxes for health care and everyone is covered. Other countries even pay for travel expenses and doctor visits to homes. The US really is so behind in the health care issue and with the HMO's and insurance companies asking process and low fines, I worry they will not always do what they should. Maybe the fines should increase if they do not actually follow the law? And I am aghast at the violence and the vitriol. This makes NO sense! And is hardly a harbinger of free speech or what Jefferson and others would have wanted from Americans - they wanted a country where people could freely gather and speak their mind without worry about violence!


Comment: #17
Posted by: Siobhan
Thu Mar 25, 2010 12:03 PM
They did live up to their convictions but is precisely their convictions that irritate so and are so wrong. Are there some good provisions in the bill, probably so. Are there enough to vote a yes on it? No. The republicans did not cross the aisle because they had onvictions and stood by them and the conviction was more than just a no. It was no to bigger government. It was, no to the government running health care and ruining it for the millions. It was no to a re-definition of ethical law making. It was no to many things...the sheer number of pages allows for alot of no's. Is there a need for health care reform, yes. Is there a need to adjust the role of government? Yes. There is a savior and it is not the government. It is precisely the size and role of government that is at the crux of our difference in convictions. And November and beyond will tell where the convictions of American people lie. American people do not just want their politicians to stick with their convictions and thus reward them by re-electing them. From where I stand I would hope and pray that they are rewarded with being sent home. A good solution to me sounds like, Pelosi, Reid, Boxer, Schumer, and a host of other liberals being sent packing and begin serving the nation in the private sector (short term). In the long term I would throw in Obama and all the others to be sent home not for having convictions and sticking with them but for having the wrong convictions and sticking with them and running them down our throats without listening to "we the people". But that is just me, and I pray millions of others who will see not only this agenda for change but will be able to see through all the other areas of our lives that the party of change wants to run downour throats because they know better than "we the people". Blessings in the house.
Comment: #18
Posted by: Pastor Steve nelson
Thu Mar 25, 2010 12:33 PM
Lets see. Over 2700 pages. Yet the supporters of the legislation only bring up the same talking points over and over ad nasuem. And those 6-10 oft repeated talking points could very easily be contained in just as many pages of legislation...not over 2700.
When the Speaker of the House states that the only way we are going to know what is in the bill is to actually enact it...it smacks of complete hubris...or is she being totally vapid?
It is the process that has a majority of American citizens upset. It is the unbridled growth of government that upsets a majority of citizens.
The power brokers in D.C. hope we will give up and just go away. They demonize those that disagree with them. Their fear brokering was actually expected by some...myself included. It is in their DNA.
I want government to tell me the way it is...not what I want to hear. Yet the current administration has taken it to a new level...Chicago style.
I have played by the rules all my life. I will again fall into the category that pays for others...yet receives no benefit personally. I have freely donated to charity & arts organizations along with being a Big Brother. I continue to do so.
However...one of the sad commentaries of this is that those of us that could afford to help others freely...are now being squeezed tighter and tighter.
When I am forced to be charitable...it ceases being charity.
Comment: #19
Posted by: smallmouthbass
Thu Mar 25, 2010 2:19 PM
Susan, I am at the point that I and sick and tired of the Democrats and how they are acting. I believe they are staging all of these threats to take the focus off the horrible bill that was passed. You and all the others are beyond disgraceful and I do not codone violence like many democrats do. Where is the proof????? I do not believe any fo it until proof is provided. Yes, there are a few people who might cause problems but they are very few. You and your conrads want to make us all out to be violent people. How about those the wished President Bush dead, Rush Limbaugh dead and other conservative news people harm. Where was all the outrage then? I never wish harm on anyone but I do hope they pay in the polls for what they have done to the American people. The way this bill was pushed through has made many angry and you have not heard the end of this protest. President Obama does not care about you, the American people but just his socialistic agenda. How about Israel??? They have left them out to dry. Where is your outrage?? Where is Alan Colmes outrage? Where is Hillary? Obama has made her powerless!!! God bless Amercia!!! You have all sold your souls but I have mine and for that I will be ok.
Comment: #20
Posted by: Kathaleen
Thu Mar 25, 2010 2:37 PM
Ms. Estrich , has it not occured to you that possibly republicans were voting Their convictions (and those of their constituents ) by voting no to the health care bill ?? That possibly they are really against bigger government controlling more and more of Americans lives ?? Or are you saying if they disagree with something the democrats consider part of their extremist agenda, they are automatically wrong and therefor voting with no backbone ?? Please give intelligent people a break .
Comment: #21
Posted by: Ralph Dyck
Thu Mar 25, 2010 3:14 PM
Re: Siobhan

You missed that the Pharmaceutical industry profits much more than insurance companies, and they still have carte blanche on the American public, to offset price controls elsewhere in the world.

I doubt that you are a physician. 15 out of 15 doctor clients were adamantly opposed to this bill for the problems it will create. None of them happen to belong to the political AMA either, staying away as the AMA rarely supports the position of a majority of physicians.

There is not a person in the United States that does not get health care. The cancer patient in Cleveland that Obama touted - eligible for numerous government programs. Most uninsured children - eligible for SCHIP. In the WHO study the United States was NUMBER 1 in outcomes of nearly every single malady. More in cost, yes, for those that wanted to pay for it. We are a unique country allowing more in individual freedoms than anywhere else in the world. We are more diverse than any other country and should not be punished with one size fits all - ANYTHING DICTATED BY THE GOVERNMENT. If the Democrats are so pro-choice, why are they so insistent on taking choices away from the people?

We keep reading about the politicians and wealthy from Single Payer health care systems around the world come to the United States for care. Why? - IT IS THE BEST CARE IN THE WORLD. Why push our system down to the lower level of care elsewhere? And by the way - Canadians pay a heck of a lot more in taxes than Americans, but not by the time Obama gets done assaulting us.
Comment: #22
Posted by: lvtaxman
Thu Mar 25, 2010 3:30 PM
Rape is as rape does. The majority was raped, rolled and left to wonder. Susan, it wasn't courage. You should know from your last campaign for the helmet...we the majority lost through chicanery and vile guile. The Speaker hardly represents anyone but wealthy slackers and the rangels of your world. Courage, you say? Perversion in Prada...
Comment: #23
Posted by: john benson
Thu Mar 25, 2010 6:14 PM
"If anyone thinks Pres. Obamas administration is concerned about the needy in America, then how can the troubled banks get away with the pathetic fractional interest rates they pay on Savings accounts?" Does Federal stimulus to these banks only trickle up? Has conscience become only an obsolete word in the dictionary? America, the home of the brave and the free; you have to be brave if you think anything is free!
Comment: #24
Posted by: Kenny
Sat Mar 27, 2010 1:33 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Susan Estrich
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

27 May 2011 Baby's Fall

19 Feb 2010 What Went Wrong?

18 Aug 2010 Watch Out for Haley Barbour