creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Susan Estrich
25 May 2012
The Next Education President

Mitt Romney is right about one thing: Too many American children do receive what he this week called a … Read More.

23 May 2012
Susan Mary Riley, We Will Miss You

It's her voice that I keep hearing in my head. "Susan," she would say, in that quiet, commanding … Read More.

18 May 2012
Boring

When my kids were young, about the worst thing they could say about something was that it was capital-b BORRRING.… Read More.

Gulnaz's Story

Share Comment

Gulnaz is an Afghan woman who was raped. For reporting it, she was sentenced to three years in prison. Her baby — a child of the rape — cries in the background. Her punishment for appealing her sentence was that it was increased to 12 years. She has been in prison for two and a half years, and her baby is with her.

The EU commissioned a documentary examining the way Afghanistan treats victims of rape. Then they decided not to release it lest they jeopardize relations with Afghanistan. There was a flurry of publicity last week, which led Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai to pardon her.

A condition was set that she must marry her rapist, becoming, it appears, his second wife.

This is how Afghanistan treats its women.

A hundred thousand American soldiers are risking their lives every day to protect this nation.

Osama bin Laden is dead. If we leave, as we should, some say there will be civil war.

If you ask me, there is already civil war against the women of Afghanistan.

No one can say with certainty how many women like Gulnaz are sitting in prison or afraid to report their victimization, knowing that if they do, they will be imprisoned, and if they complain about it, they will be imprisoned even longer.

America must protect itself from terrorism. But bin Laden is dead. Every day, brave young Americans give their lives not to protect us from terrorism, but to protect the people of Afghanistan from one another.

Why?

I have long believed that in so many fundamental ways you can judge a country by how they treat their women. I don't expect Afghanistan to turn around and support rape crisis centers in every city. Currently, the only hope for women in Gulnaz's position is to find refuge in one of the secret safe houses that women have risked their lives to create for other women.

Gulnaz's story is almost as shocking as the EU's decision not to tell it.

Who are we protecting?

Why are we so afraid to tell these stories?

Why are we spending billions of dollars to build a country that treats its women this way?

For many reasons, the United States should withdraw from Afghanistan and focus its efforts on fighting terrorists who threaten us rather than nation building. We can't afford it. No one even can say for certain how many trillions we have spent when the hidden costs of contract soldiers and support are taken into account. No one can explain to me why it is worth American lives if it is civil war and not terrorism that we are fighting against.

But if there are any remaining doubts, Gulnaz's story should be their answer.

Since I was raped three decades ago, I have spent much of my professional life fighting for legal reform so that no woman would suffer humiliation at the hands of the system after the humiliation at the hands of a rapist. But my fights — and believe me, I am proud of what so many of us have accomplished — seem trivial in comparison to the hardships and humiliations Gulnaz and so many women like her face. Without the publicity, she would have been in prison for another decade. Even with it, she might be forced to marry the man who raped her.

I don't expect Afghanistan to adopt our system of an independent national judiciary, of life tenure and a civic faith in the rule of law. To try would almost certainly be counterproductive. But I cannot sit by silently as we support a system of injustice, whether administered by trial judges or the United States-supported president.

Gulnaz deserves better. And so do the 100,000 Americans who are giving their lives to protect and preserve those who terrorize their sisters and daughters.

To find out more about Susan Estrich and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM


Comments

24 Comments | Post Comment
I read the entire article and found not one reference to Islam, the religion that relagates women to third class status. The treatment of the woman described in the article is not an Afghan problem , it's an Islamic problem. As hard as we try we will not be able to "nation build" these Middle East countries to accept our Christian values.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Early
Wed Dec 7, 2011 5:12 AM
A tragic story of ignorance and evil, but Early's point is well-taken.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Motley Wisdom
Wed Dec 7, 2011 5:53 AM
Christian values? Are we talking about the same religion that only allows men to be priests ("women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak"), states that women can't wear pants ("A woman shall not wear man's clothing") or metaphorically wear the pants ("I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man")?

The problem isn't religion as people tend to just ignore anything in their religion that doesn't coincide with their beliefs.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Clucri
Wed Dec 7, 2011 6:07 AM
Estrich says "This is how Afghanistan treats its women" and asks "Who are we protecting?" and "Why are we afraid to tell these stories ?" Really? Come on now, Estrich! You know and we know that you know what is being protected. We also know that you will simply just not say it. Such treatment of women is not confined to a country, to wit, Afghanistan as you seem to posit in order to support the current presidential US withdrawal in ignominy, but is the norm in all Islamic societies including the Islamic society here in the US. What is on display in this instance and in general is the cowardice displayed by the politically correct, by the secular viciously anti Christian left and by the “femi nazis” who will rage en masse against false, trumped up and imagined charges of minor abuse of women by a conservative Christian male but who will at the same time turn a blind eye to the Islamic practices and teachings of, rape, enslavement of women, of abuse of women, of "honor killing" of women who are all looked upon, in Islam as the mere property of the male to be done with as the property owner see fit. There may have been but I do not recall any writings by Estrich (who we are regularly reminded was previously raped) specifically on the widespread actual Islamic abuse of women but I do recall that Estrich along with Harvey A. Silverglate defended Jihad as a First Amendment religious right.
Comment: #4
Posted by: joseph wright
Wed Dec 7, 2011 6:13 AM
Estrich says "This is how Afghanistan treats its women" and asks "Who are we protecting?" and "Why are we afraid to tell these stories ?" Really? Come on now, Estrich! You know and we know that you know what is being protected. We also know that you will simply just not say it. Such treatment of women is not confined to a country, to wit, Afghanistan as you seem to posit in order to support the current presidential US withdrawal in ignominy, but is the norm in all Islamic societies including the Islamic society here in the US. What is on display in this instance and in general is the cowardice displayed by the politically correct, by the secular viciously anti Christian left and by the “femi nazis” who will rage en masse against false, trumped up and imagined charges of minor abuse of women by a conservative Christian male but who will at the same time turn a blind eye to the Islamic practices and teachings of, rape, enslavement of women, of abuse of women, of "honor killing" of women who are all looked upon, in Islam as the mere property of the male to be done with as the property owner see fit. There may have been but I do not recall any writings by Estrich (who we are regularly reminded was previously raped) specifically on the widespread actual Islamic abuse of women but I do recall that Estrich along with Harvey A. Silverglate defended Jihad as a First Amendment religious right.
As to Clucri . To endeavor to equate certain harmless, but archaic beliefs that women should not be ordained as priests in one denomination of the Christian faith and thus endeavor to equate the whole Christian faith as abusive to women and to endeavor to equate Christian beliefs with the murder, rape and widespread institutional abuse of women that is part and parcel Islam does you no credit and indeed simply illustrates the left's vicious hatred of Christianity.
Comment: #5
Posted by: joseph wright
Wed Dec 7, 2011 6:36 AM
Oh, please. Islam is a couple of hundred years behind Christianity - at most. Women in this country didn't gain the right to vote until 1920 - not even a hundred years ago. Women were regarded as little more than property until the women's rights movement started to gain momentum in the 1960's. As others have pointed out, women are still expected to submit to their husbands in most conservative Christian denominations and in Orthodox Judaism.

Rape pretty much always cast a stigma on the victim in this country as recently as the 1970's. It wasn't until people like Susan began to speak up and confront society's attitudes that this started to change, and it still hasn't completely disappeared.

Heck, Mr. Wright, here's a column in which a rape victim writes an impassioned defense of another victim's unfair treatment, and you are not only completely dismissive of this traumatic event, you pronounce it illustrative of "the left's vicious hatred of Christianity."

Frankly, yes, you do sound a lot like a fundamentalist Muslim extremist to me.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Carla
Wed Dec 7, 2011 7:44 AM
(should say "you pronounce the column illustrative...")
Comment: #7
Posted by: Carla
Wed Dec 7, 2011 7:46 AM
Re: Carla
I think you may want to re read my comment. You err on several points. Nowhere do I dismiss the trauma of rape of Estrich or any other, and nowhere do I pronounce "it" or Estrich's column, as you please, as viscious hatred of Christianity.
What I did was to say, in reply to Clucri [the clue Carla had you taken a moment to read and to understrand is to be found in the words "As to Clucri" which preceded my reply, to Clucri] that his endeavors to equate one Christian denomination's practices with the institutionalized and encouraged rape, murder, abuse and enslavement ofwomen which in large part characterizes Islam, but which is anathema to Christian and Judeo/Christian beliefs, is illustrative of the left's viscious hatred of Christianity. Frankly you sound like just like Clucri to wit, clueless.
Comment: #8
Posted by: joseph wright
Wed Dec 7, 2011 8:31 AM
I was quoting from the Bible, though, not just one denomination.
Comment: #9
Posted by: Clucri
Wed Dec 7, 2011 9:07 AM
Re: Clucri
Again clueless ! in order to quote one must actually rehearse or reproduce the words actually used in the relied upon source or by the person said to be quoted. I see no such rehearsal or reproduction in your comment and so you were not actually quoting anything. The truth is that in patent animosity to Christianity you were simply trying to equate certain worlwide Islamic practices and evils , to wit, rape, abuse, enslavement of women, all of which are held anathema in Christianity with Christianity.
Comment: #10
Posted by: joseph wright
Wed Dec 7, 2011 9:31 AM
Re: joseph wright
Ok, here are the passages I was quoting from:
1 Corinthians 14:34
Deuteronomy 22:5
1 Timothy 2:12
Comment: #11
Posted by: Clucri
Wed Dec 7, 2011 10:44 AM
Agreed, I do not believe in supporting Islam as Islam supports women as slaves. We can not bring democracy to the middle east. As it has been shown in Egypt, that when Muslim countries vote in leadership they vote in the leaders that are representative of Islam. A nation run under the rule of religion is not a democracy but rather a THEOCRACY. Adolf Hitler was brought to power by a so called "democracy" and lead Germany into genocide by his religious beliefs. Adolf Hitler, himself, said "I believe today that my conduct is in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator". Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Vol. 1 Chapter 2. No country can legitimately define itself as a democracy if it runs under the laws of religion.
Comment: #12
Posted by: laney
Wed Dec 7, 2011 3:18 PM
Re: Clucri
You know what I wrote is correct. You're either a typical Christian hater (atheist) or Muslim.
Comment: #13
Posted by: Early
Thu Dec 8, 2011 5:20 AM
Re: Early
Completely useless and abusive comment. You, like joseph wright, cannot see past the log in your eye to remove the mote in your neighbor's.
Comment: #14
Posted by: Deborah Laymon
Thu Dec 8, 2011 6:32 AM
Re: Deborah Laymon
And you don't think his comment wasn't abusive to Christians? When my beliefs are attached I don't stand quiet.
Comment: #15
Posted by: Early
Thu Dec 8, 2011 7:42 AM
Christanity isn't bad, per se, but suggesting it promotes equality among the sexes is just silly. If people followed the Bible the way that the Koran is followed through Sharia Law, it would be just as bad, if not worse. For one thing, you wouldn't be able to eat pork.
Comment: #16
Posted by: Clucri
Thu Dec 8, 2011 9:15 AM
Re: Clucri
It has not been said or sugested that Christianity "promotes equality among the sexes" as you dishonestly mischaracterize the above comments. What has been said is that the practices of rape, honor killings, abuse and enslavement of women and the treatment of women as chattels and property that still plays a central part in Islam and Islamic theology wherever taught or practiced, are anathema within Judeo/Christian practice. It is noticed that you have still to address the salient point made that your post was an attempt to draw some false equivalence between what were rules of order in liturgical meetings (Paul's letter to Corinthians in particular) with the actual violence regularly done to women as a part and parcel of Islam.
Comment: #17
Posted by: joseph wright
Thu Dec 8, 2011 10:44 AM
Re: joseph wright
You say it's an anathema, but I don't see anywhere in Christianity/Judaism dogma that forbids treating women like objects. If anything, it seems to encourage it.
Comment: #18
Posted by: Clucri
Thu Dec 8, 2011 11:07 AM
Besides, if Christians can ignore their rules, then Islams can be taught to do the same. You both worship the same insane God YHWH, after all.
Comment: #19
Posted by: Clucri
Thu Dec 8, 2011 12:16 PM
Re: Clucri So now you are outed! it seems that Early was correct when he said "You know what I wrote is correct. You're either a typical Christian hater (atheist) or Muslim.

The God I worship [and I trust Estrich worships also] is neither insane nor the same God that Islam would seek to misappropriate. My God does not condone and neither do his prophets actively condone rape, honor killing and enslavement as does Islam and its prophets and praticioners en masse.

That, Clueless, is the thrust of Estrich's piece save that she could not find the courage to openly condemn Islam as she should have but chose to do so in a cowardly passive aggressive manner by asking the questions "Who are we protecting? and "Why are we so afraid to tell these stories?" when the answer is blindingly obvious, to wit, Islam and Muslims in general.

What Estrich does not say is that if the bitterly unfortunate, abused and violated Gulnaz is somehow released and does not marry the rapist she is likely to become the victim of a so called honor killing by Muslim scum relatives. Now that is not just insane but an evil in the face of the one true God.









Comment: #13

Comment: #20
Posted by: joseph wright
Thu Dec 8, 2011 3:34 PM
Re: Clucri
Try reading the New Testament.
Comment: #21
Posted by: Early
Fri Dec 9, 2011 5:13 AM
You should both read the Old Testament. He clearly does.
Comment: #22
Posted by: Clucri
Fri Dec 9, 2011 7:47 AM
For your information, I'm not athiest or Muslim, but an ex-Catholic who follows Gnosticism.
Comment: #23
Posted by: Clucri
Fri Dec 9, 2011 7:52 AM
Re: Clucri
Sorry about that.
Comment: #24
Posted by: Early
Mon Dec 12, 2011 8:27 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Susan Estrich
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

15 Apr 2009 The Second Time Around

4 Apr 2007 The Money Primary

16 Oct 2009 A Big Difference for Science and Medicine