creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Susan Estrich
17 Feb 2012
The Santorum Surge

Could it really happen? Could Rick Santorum be the Republican nominee? Is God a Democrat? Not to be mean, but … Read More.

15 Feb 2012
That's What Friends Are For

Here we go again: a tragedy in the music world, a tragedy waiting to happen that did. Disturbing headlines … Read More.

10 Feb 2012
What Happened to Newt and Mitt?

Newt's easy. While all of us on the Democratic side were playing "root for Newt," Republicans were … Read More.

Attack, He Said

Share Comment

What does Barack Obama have to do with Britney Spears and Paris Hilton?

Absolutely nothing, as far as I can tell. A mentally unstable party girl and an heiress/party girl? Did I miss the part where Obama's father was a hotel magnate, where he couldn't be trusted to take care of his children, where he literally partied till he dropped?

Yet that is the connection the McCain campaign is trying to make in its latest attack ad. Sen. McCain says he's "proud" of the ad. With all due respect (if any is left), what is there to be proud of? "I'm John McCain and I approved this ad." Why?

There's no honor in the latest McCain ad. It has nothing to do with issues, legitimate differences, or the strengths or weaknesses of the candidates. It's nothing more than a cheap shot at guilt by association or, worse yet, non-association, playing to people's ignorance instead of their intelligence.

I'd like to believe it won't work. I'd like to believe that people will judge McCain and Obama on their qualifications, their visions, their positions, their experience — not on the basis of silly attack ads trying to tie them to people they've never met.

If McCain wants to claim he's more experienced, fair enough. If he wants to argue that his policies will be better, that he'll do more to bring gas prices down and home prices up, even better.

But even Obama's most ardent detractors should be willing to admit he is a man of enormous intelligence, a guy with a vision and a gift.

I don't know Paris Hilton; she's not a friend of mine. Neither is Britney. But I do know this: Barack Obama is no Paris Hilton. And no Britney Spears.

I'm not naive. I understand that negative ads work. I have no doubt that McCain, walking a tightrope between the conservatives, whose support he needs and who could wreak havoc at his Convention, and the independents he used to appeal to, would rather turn this election into a referendum on Obama than an up-or-down vote on a third Republican term in the White House. I understand that he'd rather focus attention on Obama the celebrity than on McCain the professional politician, the Bush supporter, the Washington insider, the friend of lobbyists.

If he wants to run an ad attacking Obama for the church he attended and the pastor he defended, so it goes. If he wants to claim Obama was too recently a member of the State Senate in Illinois to be moving to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., so be it. But Britney and Paris? Have you no shame, senator? How dumb do you think Americans are?

So why is McCain doing this?

Why is a man who promised to run a "respectful campaign," a guy who was himself the victim of a pretty ugly campaign that left him bruised and angry eight years ago, instead running a ridiculous and shameful one — and in July, no less, with months to go before Election Day?

Presumably, it's because he thinks it will work, and that's all he cares about. Shame on all of us if he's right.

To find out more about Susan Estrich and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

19 Comments | Post Comment
Duh, he means that he promotes himself with the cheesiness of a rock start or cheap media whore. Is that hard to see? It's quite obvious as he uses every trick in the book and the lowest one is the race card, with his reference to "I don't look like the presidents on the bills." As if anyone has questioned or even brought up his race. He's the only one who does that to make himself a presumptive victim. How stupid does he think we are?
Comment: #1
Posted by: click212
Fri Aug 1, 2008 6:41 AM
Susan, Susan, Susan, there you go again with your clouded vision of what's really going on. Brittany and Paris are celebrities(OK they happen to be a little out there). Obama has celebrity status that's even bigger than theirs but as the ad clearly implies, though you can't or won't see it, he's a celebrity but can he lead a country? Most agree that's a resounding No. Did you totally tune out the ad in the first 10 seconds or did not you also see his positions opposing off-short drilling and raising taxes? Those are legitimate issues to which McCain, and a lot of us, opposes. But wait, we don't have to worry about becoming foreign oil independent by drilling here and now. We only have to properly inflate our tires and tune our cars and the price of gas will instantly go down. I checked my tire pressure yesterday, added about lb. or two and guess what? Gas was still at 3.89. What happened? Also, someone needs to educate Mr. Eliteist and let him know cars aren't tuned anymore.
Comment: #2
Posted by: webass
Fri Aug 1, 2008 9:40 AM
Susan: I support Obama. The ad was poorly produced and executed but nevertheless had to do with star power. Guess what? It's one reason that Susan's gal Hillary lost the nomination. Bill had it. Reagan had it. Gore didn't Kerry didn't and poor pitiful picked on Hillary didn't either. Sorry Susan.
Comment: #3
Posted by: keef
Fri Aug 1, 2008 12:40 PM
Susan: You asked what it is that Sen. Obama has in common with Paris Hilton and Brittany Spears. It is this--which applies more to Ms. Hilton than to Ms. Spears--they are all three famous for being famous. That's it. They're not famous for anything they have accomplished, they are...I would be repeating myself. All the best to you.
Comment: #4
Posted by: davd w pennington
Fri Aug 1, 2008 12:54 PM
While the McCain ad may be over the top, it does have a point. Obama's popularity isfor the most part not based on his policies. In April a media poll suggested that 85% of Obama supporters that were polled could not name any of Obama's policies. His popularity is based on being different and being for change. You state that McCain should focus on the issues rather than attacking, well, it appears that Obama has not really focused on many issues, either. His huge popularity is due, in part, to the widespread media coverage he has been getting. There are many reasons for this coverage. Among them are that many journalists are Democrats and are happy to see that their party has a strong candidate, but the most important reason is that Obama is seen as an historical candidate and the journalists want to be a part of history if he is elected..
Also, you failed to address Obama's ads. His campaign repeatedly characterizes McCain as " Four more years of Bush" while McCain's and Bush's policies are far from being identical. They twist ncCain's reluctant acceptance of teh Bush tax cuts, his vote to authorize the war, and his willingness to stay in Iraq longer than 16 months after his election as meaning that they are identical. If looked into more closely at the policies, they are quite differnt than BUsh'. Obama is unwilling to discuss the specifics of McCain's policies as compared to his. The intiatio of these types of ads and coments by the Obama campaign coincided with a rise in Obama's poularity against McCain. Were tehy the reason? I can't say for sure, but they played a part. If Obama wishes to avoid these types of ads, maybe he should stop running the same exact type of campaign. If you slingt mud, it wil likely be slung back. Obama also pledged to run a "Mud-free' respectful campaign. Why haven't you mentioned that in this article?
I think that they are both caving in to their professional campaign stafff, who are used to running campaigns in this manner. I think that they would both be better served if they stopped running these types of campaign, but according to past campaigns I am in the minority. Despite all of the protests, this mud-slinging seems to work most of the time.
Comment: #5
Posted by: crash
Fri Aug 1, 2008 1:56 PM
Susan, For an intelligent woman you are stooping to the level of desperate democrats in this race. I watched Obama's speech in Germany and watched him in France. His new tactic is acting like he has been elected already so most conservative and independent voters won't vote because they feel why bother. Talk about low tactics, Obama is king!!!. Have you noticed he does not denounce anyone he has his camp do it? You don't hear the words come out of him mouth so he won't offend that stream of people. Oh now he is looking into off shore drilling??? I guess he read the polls. I truly believe the democrats never thought Obama would be in this position for they were confident that Hillary would win. This was not in their plans and are panicking.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Kathaleen McCausland
Sat Aug 2, 2008 11:25 AM
Susan's comments are pure propaganda because she is a pro and could not have missed the point McCains made. Obama has not done anything in the Senate or anywhere else denoting anything akin to leadership. He has had no legislative victories to boast of in the US Senate or in the Ill. chamber, nothing. He never lead a State, nothing of note anywhere. He fame is all hype by the media. Obama's whole persona is an illusion, just like Edwards, Mr. Clean down for the poor, got caught cheating on his wife with cancer and fathering a child with the mistress while running for president. Obama is Wright, Obama is Jackson, Obama is Ayres, Obama is Rezko. Obama could not disown these people because he is these people, just wait and see. Peace McD
Comment: #7
Posted by: Michael Duffy
Sun Aug 3, 2008 3:16 AM
Did Obama's father take care of him? Wasn't his mother on welfare at some point? What experience does Obama have? Although I'm not thrilled with McCain, and would never vote for Obama (until he learns how many states there are in the U.S. and convinces me that he even likes America) I see McCains point. Obama is not qualified to be president of my country.
Comment: #8
Posted by: Elitha
Sun Aug 3, 2008 5:44 AM
Susan,

Give me a break....you are obviously smarter than this......even I can figure out that the point of the AD.....as is true with most of the current memebers of the House and Senate, in my opinion.....is that like the 2 Hollywood Glamour Girls......it is a matter of "STYLE" versus "SUBSTANCE".......if the Obama supporters have a problem with that message, I would suggest that they point to something that their candidiate has actually accomplished as opposed to the usual Washington double talk........and also start outlining some solid plans that do not include raising taxes, increasing a federal budget (that really needs to be cut....now that would be novel)......and increasing the scope of the government.......
Comment: #9
Posted by: Doug
Sun Aug 3, 2008 3:49 PM
I think at the core Barack Obama is a sensitive and decent guy. His lack of leadership experience disqualifies him from being President of the United States.
Comment: #10
Posted by: Edster
Sun Aug 3, 2008 4:41 PM
I think at the core Barack Obama is a sensitive and decent guy. His lack of leadership experience disqualifies him from being President of the United States.
Comment: #11
Posted by: Edster
Sun Aug 3, 2008 4:41 PM
Susan, your analysis has been honest until now...please don't suspend disbelief that experience, commitment and humility are prerequisites of leadership. Obama's "Present" votes in the Illinois legislature are shameful, as is running for POTUS with barely 3 full years of Senate experience yielding no legislative advances of note. I think the "Professional Democrat" class of commentators and policy advocates - the more cynical of whom perhaps assessed along with the Kennedys that it was better for business to have a new face than another Clinton - are desperately grasping at straws with Obama. I am a nurse. I "hope" that all of my patients get better, but I know that that outcome is best achieved with evidence and experience based practice, not just enthusiasm and rhetoric. More pettily, I think it is also ridiculous that Obama, the father of two young girls, just quit smoking in time for the election cycle - being a parent apparently wasn't enough cause for him? And his wife essentially a risk manager for a hospital? This is just selfish drama and pathetic. Obama is not ready for prime time.
Comment: #12
Posted by: Cheryl
Sun Aug 3, 2008 5:06 PM
Susan, your analysis has been honest until now...please don't suspend disbelief that experience, commitment and humility are prerequisites of leadership. Obama's "Present" votes in the Illinois legislature are shameful, as is running for POTUS with barely 3 full years of Senate experience yielding no legislative advances of note. I think the "Professional Democrat" class of commentators and policy advocates - the more cynical of whom perhaps assessed along with the Kennedys that it was better for business to have a new face than another Clinton - are desperately grasping at straws with Obama. I am a nurse. I "hope" that all of my patients get better, but I know that that outcome is best achieved with evidence and experience based practice, not just enthusiasm and rhetoric. More pettily, I think it is also ridiculous that Obama, the father of two young girls, just quit smoking in time for the election cycle - being a parent apparently wasn't enough cause for him? And his wife essentially a risk manager for a hospital? This is just selfish drama and pathetic. Obama is not ready for prime time.
Comment: #13
Posted by: Cheryl
Sun Aug 3, 2008 5:07 PM

The "THREE AIRHEADS" ad was a brilliantly concieved ad that drives home a powerful message. Although the pundits who are Democrats refuse to acknowledge that the point of the ad was to portray OBAMA as an empty-suited airhead, the public got the point. And the ad is effective. The good ole boys in my neck of the woods got the point immediately. McCain will be running that ad in more than just the three states he started with to very good effect. There was no racism intended in that ad as some pundits tried to claim. Just theTHREE AIRHEADS message. ROBERT
Comment: #14
Posted by: robert lipka
Mon Aug 4, 2008 12:04 AM
Ms. Estrich, the ad is spot-on. Barack, like the two celebrities he's compared to, has done nothing of substance to earn the celebrity he now enjoys. What's wrong with pointing that out, especially in a somewhat humorous way? But wait--Britney is actually an accomplished singer and entertainer, so maybe the ad was unfair to her, hmmm?
Comment: #15
Posted by: Kapmep
Mon Aug 4, 2008 6:23 AM
No one can believe you, Susan, are stumped about the "Celeb" ad that mocks Obama's star quality. You know darn well it seems to be working. McCain has finally found Barry's achilles heel.......he's just too perfect and just thinks too highly of himself. After all, "we are the ones we've been waiting for"! Who the heck talks like that?
Comment: #16
Posted by: pwalter
Mon Aug 4, 2008 7:20 AM
Susan, what do Paris, Brittany and the Senator have in common? When you look behind the veneer there is nothing there. Sen. Obama has elected to take the strategy that any attack on his lack of experience, failure to take a stand on critical issues, being on both sides of the same issue, and never having to say "I was wrong" be branded a racist attack. He is hoping that America will see race as a "third rail" in this election and that the McCain camp will be forced to tip toe around critical issues. Obama is wrong, and this was a critical misjudgment on the part of his campaign.
The American electorate wants to know where their candidate stands on critical issues. Will the candidate address the current energy crisis or come up with some bogus $1000 for everyone and we tax oil company's profits. Even if you never took a single economics class you would know: this does not change the supply of energy; taxes are passed on to consumers through higher prices; and, if oil companies cut off their investments in exploration and research that will reduce (not increase) future energy flows.
Obama has decided that being a "celebrity" is the way to win. He can fill an auditorium, or music venue with thousands of "fans" who cannot ask questions, and only get to hear what The Chosen One has decided they should hear. When anyone pokes at these "soap bubbles" the campaign immediately responds - Unfair, racist, see I told you they would come after ME personally. Obama's positions must be able to withstand the light of sincere political scrutiny.
This is a cruel world we live in. I fear that electing Obama will be a return to the Jimmy Carter era. A political lightweight who got overwhemled by real political events.
Comment: #17
Posted by: Frank Catenaccio
Tue Aug 5, 2008 5:34 AM
Susan, one of the great ads I must say. I can see why you're so upset...........must bring back the days you led Mike Dukakis in defeat....I sure do miss Lee Atwater, God rest his sole.
Comment: #18
Posted by: obamaman
Tue Aug 5, 2008 1:45 PM
imagine what would happen if someone made fun of his ears
Comment: #19
Posted by: obamaman
Tue Aug 5, 2008 1:47 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Susan Estrich
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 20 Feb 2012
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 18 Feb 2012

26 Feb 2010 Playing Nice

7 Nov 2007 The Wrong Line

8 Jun 2011 Anthony Weiner's Viral Adventure