creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Steve Chapman
Steve Chapman
12 Feb 2012
False Fears About a Nuclear Iran

"The stupidest thing I have ever heard." — Meir Dagan, former head of Israel's intelligence agency,… Read More.

9 Feb 2012
Appease This!

On April 1, 2001, a U.S. spy plane and a Chinese fighter collided over the South China Sea, forcing the … Read More.

5 Feb 2012
The Flaws of Mitt and Newt

Newt Gingrich has an exquisitely sensitive moral antenna, and Mitt Romney's remark suggesting indifference to … Read More.

When Term-Limits Advocates Won't Leave

Share Comment

When Republican Helen Chenoweth ran for Congress in Idaho in 1994, she not only endorsed term limits on members but pledged she would leave Washington after three terms no matter what. But something strange happened in 2000, when it was time for Chenoweth to step down: She did it.

What was she thinking?

In 2000, when Republican Timothy Johnson ran for Congress in a central Illinois district, he promised he would serve a maximum of six years. Voters may have been skeptical, since Johnson had spent the previous 24 years in the Illinois Legislature, but he was adamant.

"There's a lot of opportunity for disconnect if you stay too long in Washington," he declared. "I'm still a citizen legislator now. Having term limits would make you more responsive to your constituents, rather than to bureaucrats." That vow may have been the difference in the election, which he won with 53 percent of the vote.

But the citizen legislator has since made the transition to congressman-for-life. He announced in 2002, during an easy re-election race, that he had thought the matter over and decided it would be better for his constituents if he took the paper his promise was written on and lit a match to it.

"I've got to say in all candor, the innate advantages that an incumbent member of Congress has, particularly after redistricting, are really pretty dramatic," he confessed. He was also perceptive enough to notice that there were advantages for him personally: "When I go to Carmi or I go to South Streator, you're a celebrity."

Johnson, however, has plenty of company on Capitol Hill. In 2006, there were nine House Republicans who once vowed to leave after the coming election but later decided they'd rather stay. Former U.S. Term Limits spokesman Paul Jacob, who in 2000 made a campaign appearance with Johnson, says that in all, at least 25 members of Congress (not all Republicans) have broken such promises.

This brings to mind Lily Tomlin's remark: "No matter how cynical you get, it is impossible to keep up." When Republicans managed to win control of the U.S.

House of Representatives in 1994 after 40 years in the minority, they owed the victory in large part to their support for term limits, an idea that was much in vogue. Better yet for them, they got the benefits of that bargain without ever having to subject themselves to it.

In 1995, the Supreme Court ruled that congressional tenure could not be curbed except by constitutional amendment. And as it happened, enough House Republicans voted against a constitutional amendment to scotch that option once and for all.

But that didn't necessarily kill the entire concept. The fact that term limits can't be imposed by statute does not mean they can't be self-imposed — as they were by so many House candidates when they first ran. The Supreme Court decision, however, gives these Republicans a way to justify a change of heart. Stepping down, you see, would amount to unilateral disarmament that would help Democrats regain a majority.

It's a brilliant excuse whose only disadvantage is that it isn't true. Of the nine turncoats who chose to run this year, eight got 60 percent or more of the vote in 2004. The other, Barbara Cubin of Wyoming, won by a comfortable 13-point margin.

Most of them occupy seats carefully drawn to keep them in GOP hands until the twelfth of never. The obvious exception is Cubin, whose district consists of the whole state of Wyoming — which President Bush carried with 69 percent of the vote the last go-round.

So it would be no sacrifice to the party if these lawmakers all stepped down. They could keep their promises, and the Republicans could hang on to their seats. But here's the thing: They don't want to leave.

They have come up with lots of rationalizations for sticking around. Rep. Zach Wamp, R-Tenn., had the best one: "I still don't plan on staying forever, but after Sept. 11, I felt like I should renew my commitment to public service."

That's one way term-limits champions could make the case for abandoning the commitment they made when it was politically advantageous. Or they could try the explanation once offered to a lobbyist by Louisiana Gov. Earl Long about a campaign promise he didn't keep: "Tell them I lied."

Steve Chapman blogs daily at newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/steve_chapman. To find out more about Steve Chapman, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
Sir;...I don't mean to be cynical; but perhaps people are elected because they lie, and because the people know they lie, and because voters really do not want the truth...It is possible that the only time some voters are treated as human beings deserving of any respect is when their representative asks for their vote... It's possible...I know a women who spends her self broke at every opportunity...It is only because when she goes to buy something, people treat her like a human being... Sans l'argent, Sans l'respect...Same with voters... Once every few years they get to be some body...They get to see some usually male prostitute begin roasting his eternal soul before their very eyes for their vote... It is a morality play; but it would not be possible if the people were not corrupt themselves, knowing they are corrupt, and fearing the corruption of their neighbors... What is the point now, if we should have some real democracy, and change nothing else about our system??? The poor, the minority, and the powerless would as much be the vitims tomorrow as today...Only if protection for every person could be made law, so each is free in his own affairs so long as he does not affect others, so that his affairs do not become theirs- would true democracy work... Thinking majority rule is democracy, we are all in danger from a tyranny of the majority... The religious right wants to command our lives with a simple majority... Even when they cannot reach a majority they still feel entitled to rule our lives... They will never be bound by the laws of man, but they would bind all with their conception of the laws of God...It is only more corruption... It is not freedom...It is not democracy... Majority rule is the method by which we have been ruled, and our rights denied... We can be ruined by halves, and we have been...But it is a corruption of democracy, when we could demand full respect, to have to settle for some show of respect every few years... We settle for less because knowing our own corruption, we cannot trust the corruption of others...That is the problem that needs fixing...Everyone has to give up the ability to bother others in the pursuit of their own best interest if it does not affect them...It is out of our desire to rule that we are ruled..It is nonsense to think societies are corrupt from the top down... They are corrupt from the bottom up, and corrupt though and through...If we were not all to some degree corrupt the corruption at the top would make us revolt... We all have no virtue..We all want to turn that corruption to our benefit, and so we inevitably must suffer it....Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Sun Feb 1, 2009 5:33 AM
Barbara Cubin did renege on her promise on term limits; however, she did not run for re-election in 2008, let alone win with a 13% margin.
Comment: #2
Posted by: geraldr
Sun Feb 1, 2009 8:01 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Steve Chapman
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Lawrence Kudlow
Lawrence KudlowUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Jackie Gingrich Cushman
Jackie Gingrich CushmanUpdated 16 Feb 2012

12 Apr 2009 When Jurors Talk Back

7 Nov 2010 Attack of the Food Police

10 Feb 2008 Beyond the Red-Blue Divide