creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Steve Chapman
Steve Chapman
12 Feb 2012
False Fears About a Nuclear Iran

"The stupidest thing I have ever heard." — Meir Dagan, former head of Israel's intelligence agency,… Read More.

9 Feb 2012
Appease This!

On April 1, 2001, a U.S. spy plane and a Chinese fighter collided over the South China Sea, forcing the … Read More.

5 Feb 2012
The Flaws of Mitt and Newt

Newt Gingrich has an exquisitely sensitive moral antenna, and Mitt Romney's remark suggesting indifference to … Read More.

John McCain, Reveling in Anger

Share Comment

DAVENPORT, IOWA — If the presidential campaign were the lead-up to a World Wrestling Entertainment smackdown, John McCain would be winning. A former high-school wrestler, he's been making the most of the chance to show his withering contempt for the other guy.

At a town hall meeting on Friday in Wisconsin, McCain had taken a surprising tack. When a woman in the audience said that Barack Obama "is an Arab" (presumably meaning "Muslim"), McCain said it wasn't so. Responding to a questioner who was "scared" by Obama, McCain assured him, "Sen. Obama is a decent person and a person you don't have to be scared of as president of the United States" — a statement that sparked boos.

Today, McCain is intent on making sure any boos are directed at his opponent. He slams him for voting for pork barrel projects, planning to raise taxes and "insider dealing."

That's just a warmup for his most contemptuous jibe. "He's even questioned my truthfulness," says McCain, his voice marinated in acid, "and let me reply in the plainest terms I know: I don't need lessons on telling the truth to the American people, and were I ever to need any improvement in that regard, I probably wouldn't seek it from a Chicago politician."

Of course many voters may think there is no important ethical difference between a Chicago politician and a Washington politician, which is what McCain has been for more than a quarter of a century. The accusations of dissembling have come not only from the Obama campaign, but from independent monitors that even McCain invokes when convenient.

And if the GOP campaign is trying to distance itself from those who harbor dark suspicions about Obama's religion, someone didn't get the memo. Before McCain's arrival at today's rally, a local clergyman delivered an invocation that instructed the Almighty on His handling of the coming election.

"There are millions of people around this world praying to their god — whether it's Hindu, Buddha, Allah — that his opponent wins, for a variety of reasons," said Rev.

Arnold Conrad. "And Lord, I pray that you would guard your own reputation because they're going to think that their god is bigger than you if that happens."

No one seems to think it's strange or inappropriate to portray the election as a choice between Jehovah and Allah. Maybe the audience is too busy pondering some discomfiting questions: If McCain loses, is it because God wanted him to lose? Or is it because one of those other gods is running the show?

This hostile note is in keeping with the tone struck by the candidate. Several senators, including some in his own party, have complained of his explosive temper, and he has even acknowledged that his hothead reputation has some basis. But today, McCain is advertising it as an asset during a time of economic trouble. He sounds madder than John Edwards on a bad hair day.

"One thing I hear from Americans at every stop is that they're angry," he says. "They're angry. THEY'RE ANGRY." He then lists the things they are angry about, including the failures of Wall Street. "You're angry," he declares, "and I'm angry too." But he sounds more like someone hacked off about trailing in the polls rather than someone infuriated by what he calls "greed, corruption and incompetence."

Part of the problem is that Republicans can't really bring off denunciations of greed. Ordinarily, they treat it, with sound insight, not as a mortal sin but as a powerful natural drive that capitalism harnesses for the benefit of all.

They are more convincing when excoriating governmental failure. This time, that's also a problematic sell, since the failures of the past eight years are generally blamed, fairly or not, on a president who heads McCain's own party.

But the real question McCain's performance raises is this: Assuming Americans are mad, does that mean they are looking for a president who revels in his anger? Right now a lot of people are feeling scared, bewildered and even lost. But rather than seek a leader who shares those feelings, they probably would like one who can alleviate them.

If voters want a president who is angry, McCain may win. If they prefer a president who will remove the causes of their anger, his exhibition of outrage will encourage them to look elsewhere.

Steve Chapman blogs daily at newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/steve_chapman. To find out more about Steve Chapman, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


Comments

5 Comments | Post Comment
Couldn't agree more. I'm burned out and turned off with all this "fight" rhetoric. The last thing we need is another fight. What good would it serve this country to have a corporate lapdog and a pitbull with lipstick making the decisions? You talk about a fight! Children fight, dogs fight; we need cool heads and sharp minds in office. We've suffered under "the cowboy" and as the cowboys did to the Indians, "the cowboy" did to us. Now they want to give us "the mavrick". Will "the mavrick" have a shoot out at the ok corral or just gamble our country away?
Comment: #1
Posted by: liz
Tue Oct 14, 2008 10:00 AM
This country doesn't need a fighter, we need a leader!
Comment: #2
Posted by: liz
Tue Oct 14, 2008 10:35 AM
Re: liz Fair questions. Now I've got some for you - a deeply corrupt, socialist Chicago politician (and darling of anti-American terrorists & assorted bigots) is a more palatable alternative than a "corporate lapdog and a pitbull with lipstick?" I won't even respond to your moronic comment about the "cowboy." And I think just the opposite about the "fight" business. McCain is down in the polls not because he's fought too much...he is down because he's tried too hard to be a nice guy. And I don't just mean on the campaign trail, I mean throughout his political career. He has pissed off conservatives (the base of the GOP, without which no Republican can win) again and again - McCain-Feingold, amnesty for illegals, the Gang of 14, the list goes on and on. Sure, I'm disgusted with Obama and his legions of starry-eyed disciples...but the worst of it is that the entire country will have to pay for your short sightedness if he wins. Get ready for YOUR (yes, yours too) taxes to increase, and for the United States to suffer a major terrorist attack in the next four years, being that our enemies will see a paper tiger int he White House. All because you and yours were so hung up on getting rid of the "cowboy."
Comment: #3
Posted by: Matt
Thu Oct 16, 2008 1:51 PM
The country does need a leader - one who is also a fighter. What it doesn't need is someone who sits in the Oval Office asking, "Can't we all just talk this out?" That's not leadership...it's cowardice and capitulation.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Matt
Thu Oct 16, 2008 1:54 PM
It saddens me when someone who is supposed to be spreading the word of God uses his pulpit to preach his own fear and hatred. People will think "their God" is stronger than "our God?" Wow. That isn't preaching God's word; that's preaching hatred and prejudice, and as a Christian I consider that to be the most un-Christian behavior imaginable.
Yes, if Obama wins and he doesn't deliver what the country needs, we will all suffer. People voted for George W. Bush twice, and now we're all suffering for their choice. That's the risk you take, no matter who you vote for. The same could conceivably happen if McCain wins. Since I'm reasonably sure taxes will go up no matter who wins (remember the "Read My Lips" speech?), I'll base my vote on the issues, and not on the candidates' religious practices. As far as I'm concerned their faith is none of my business, and the founding fathers declared as much in the First Amendment.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Jon
Sun Oct 19, 2008 12:42 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Steve Chapman
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Lawrence Kudlow
Lawrence KudlowUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012

23 Jan 2011 How To Succeed in the NFL Without Yelling

23 Oct 2011 Herman Cain's Glib Confusion

30 Mar 2008 You Can't Always Believe Your Eyes