creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Steve Chapman
Steve Chapman
16 Feb 2012
Food and Conscience

Factory farming and its abuses were once the province of an eccentric minority that invited ridicule and scorn.… Read More.

12 Feb 2012
False Fears About a Nuclear Iran

"The stupidest thing I have ever heard." — Meir Dagan, former head of Israel's intelligence agency,… Read More.

9 Feb 2012
Appease This!

On April 1, 2001, a U.S. spy plane and a Chinese fighter collided over the South China Sea, forcing the … Read More.

False Cures for the Recession

Share Comment

Times of emergency produce demands for action, and Barack Obama does not need to be urged twice. Weeks before taking office, he wants Congress to pass a fiscal stimulus bill costing half a trillion dollars or so, and his allies on Capitol Hill will undoubtedly give it to him. Amid a recession that some fear will spiral into a depression, no one wants to be accused of doing too little.

Obama's plan is expected to call for a host of remedies — including extended unemployment benefits, aid to state governments, more infrastructure spending and a middle-class tax cut. It brings to mind the character in Stephen Leacock's humorous novel "Gertrude the Governess," who "flung himself upon his horse and rode madly off in all directions."

Even many conservatives, however, want Washington to deploy fiscal weapons. Economist John Taylor of Stanford University and the Hoover Institution, an adviser to John McCain's campaign, says it "would be a significant stimulus to the economy" if the incoming president were to extend the Bush tax cuts.

There are only two drawbacks to the proposals offered by both the right and the left. First, they would cost a lot of money, either in lost revenue or additional federal expenditures, further bloating our gargantuan national debt. That cost would be worthwhile if it were essential to stave off a total economic collapse. But there is a second problem: These plans are not likely to work.

Shoveling cash into various public programs sounds like a surefire way to boost total demand and thus juice the economy. But the money doesn't sprout from trees in Tim Geithner's backyard. Any funds it wants to spend, the government will have to borrow. The people who lend the money will no longer have it to spend. So the total amount of spending may not change much, if at all.

Timing is another glitch. Putting crews to work on roads and bridges doesn't happen overnight — plans have to be approved, bids have to be solicited and contracts have to be signed. The Department of Transportation says that even with projects that are primed and ready, only one-fourth of the money gets spent in the first year.

By the time an infrastructure program gets rolling, the downturn will almost certainly be shrinking in the rearview mirror.

If there are worthy projects out there, now is a good time to do them. But all we should expect in return is a better infrastructure a few years from now, not a stronger economy next May.

Tax cuts also promise disappointment. The Bush administration claimed its 2001 tax cut had a tonic effect on a weak economy, but it turns out that most of the money went to increase savings or reduce debt, not to unleash spending. Likewise with this year's tax rebates.

Even some experts who favor keeping tax rates low doubt that extending the Bush tax cuts beyond 2010 would do anything for the economy right now. "As a tool for dealing with this crisis, I don't know," Nobel Laureate economist Robert Lucas of the University of Chicago told me. "It's misleading to advertise them as an anti-recession device."

In fact, it's misleading to advertise any fiscal policy as an anti-recession device. University of California, Berkeley economist Alan Auerbach examined all the different tools that have been tried in the last 50 years and found "little evidence that these effects have provided a significant contribution to economic stabilization, if in fact they have worked in the right direction at all."

Everyone wants to do something. But holding off on a fiscal stimulus package wouldn't exactly mean doing nothing. Monetary policy has historically had a more potent and predictable effect on the economy than fiscal policy, and in recent months Ben Bernanke has been spraying money with a fire hose — cutting interest rates, boosting bank reserves 15-fold since August and taking radical steps like buying up short-term commercial debt.

All those steps will pay off, but they take time. Adding fiscal measures would probably be superfluous. If you want to go to the 10th floor on an elevator, punching the button over and over won't get you there any faster. We can throw a lot of money at the recession, but in the end, what we'll get is no hastening of recovery and a big stack of bills.

Steve Chapman blogs daily at newsblogs.chicagotribune.com/steve_chapman. To find out more about Steve Chapman, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Sir;... Medicine doesn't work on the dead, so the question is not one of remedies, but of time, and how many of us will die trying to revive a failed economy...This thing called capitalism has been on life supports for a long time... It was not long ago the S and L disaster was feeding on the people, and Enron was an example of obviously wide spread stock waterering and selling over value... All the time that capitalism has been sucking wealth out of this society, and this people, it has been exporting capital to emerging markets and importing from them... To increase profits they drove down wages... To increase profits they sold credit to milk wealth out of every exchange, every process, and the whole population... To increase wealth they denied government their support and forced government to borrow to fund basic services which they could then collect interest on, or see bled out of the poor... If this government is willing to keep capital alive it has precious little medicine, because government, and the people it is supposed to serve have been starved to make a fraction of the population super rich... If government will not bleed the rich as we have been bled, then they will have to ask us to sacrifice, and give even more of our lives to this disaster called capital...If this nonsense is the result of letting capital govern us, then what is the point???Can anyone deny that the rich have had their way, and that the people have had no creditable defense from government??? I have worked for profit all my working life with little to show for it, and that little has been endangered by capitalist excesses... From almost the birth of Capital, it has rejected the notion of just profits, and in England, the church which stood for just profits was deprived of rights and robbed...If capital lives it will reject any limits on the desire to feed on us... The rich think we are cattle that can be deprived of our wealth, our time, and our lives... I don't care if I die with capitalism, because that economy without morals should die and be forgotten by time...Seriously; will we borrow more money from the communists to float our capitalism??? If they have money to loan, and we can only survive on borrow what does that tell you???Take a look at capitalism... It is entirely on the surface, like a balloon, filled with air and leaking......Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Thu Dec 4, 2008 1:43 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Steve Chapman
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 20 Feb 2012
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 18 Feb 2012

6 Dec 2007 Is Canadian Health Care a Contradiction in Terms?

12 Feb 2012 False Fears About a Nuclear Iran

23 Dec 2010 In 2010, the World Stalled on the Road to Democracy