Voters Want Leaders, Not Politicians
Excuse me for not shedding a tear for the recent electoral losses of Sen. Arlen Specter in Pennsylvania and Rep. Parker Griffith of Alabama.
Instead of sticking to their principals when it came to their politics, both decided to play crass politics by switching parties in order to make it easier to be re-elected. Well, we see how well that worked out for them.
Specter, a longtime moderate Republican, was down big-time in the polls against a Republican opponent and took a major gamble last year by deciding to run as a Democrat. Yet that didn't do him much good, as he lost to Rep. Joe Sestak in the Democratic primary. Because he has been in office for so long — 30 years in the U.S. Senate — he also got swept up in the anti-incumbent fervor we're seeing nationwide.
But anyone with any sense would tell you that Specter was no Democrat. He was merely a Republican trying to find an easier route to keeping his political seat.
Then there is Griffith, who rode Democratic enthusiasm to win a seat in Congress two years ago. But after watching the first year of President Barack Obama, he decided to start calling him and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi socialists and said he was ashamed to be a Democrat.
Thinking this was the right time to switch parties and be hailed as a victor by the right wing, Griffith got crushed at the polls, losing to the Tea Party favorite Mo Brooks by 24 points.
Griffith didn't realize that if voters in a Republican primary are voting, they don't want Republican-lite — they can get the real thing.
Their losses underscore the real issue we have today, that there are far too many gutless wonders who occupy political office and are deathly afraid to do what they are elected to do: lead.
There are significant issues in this nation right now, and all that happens is we get watered-down results because politicians don't want to A) offend their major political donors with real legislation that helps people, and B) make the tough calls on policies that might prove to be unpopular at home, but are necessary to advance the country.
For instance, everyone is up in arms about the Arizona immigration law, but in the absence of immigration reform on the federal level, it only makes sense that states would begin to grasp at straws to deal with the issue. Was the initial law a case of racial profiling coming into the mix? Of course! But it still speaks to a need for members of Congress to man up and woman up, and make the hard choices.
The problem there is it is really lose-lose politically.
They won't touch it in an election year for fear of making a tough vote and affecting their re-election. Will it happen in 2011? Maybe. But then the excuse will be the 2012 election. What about 2013? We'll then hear the cry about the 2014 midterm election. See, this can go and on.
Have we seen true leadership with financial reform and "too big to fail"? Nope. President Obama decries it; Speaker Pelosi rips it; Republicans trash it; but when it came time to do something about it, they all punted. And now analysts at Moody's, the credit-rating agency, say "too big to fail" is still in place, even if the current bill is signed into law.
For years, we have heard politicians from both parties talk about the need for Social Security reform. But it's called the third rail of politics — "you don't touch it."
So Congress passes the buck each year because no one in either party wants to be a true leader and take on the issue. We need to get it done. It is clear that we are in store for a heap of trouble down the road, but with folks today protecting their political jobs, nothing gets done.
There is no doubt there are some good men and women in Washington, D.C. They get sent there hoping to do the right thing, but get sucked into the "do no harm" aspect of governing. The lobbyists descend on them like locusts; their party leaders tell them to back off when it comes to real change; and we, the voters, end up getting screwed in the process.
Call me an idealist, but I would rather lose with my dignity than win in shame.
It is abundantly clear that this country needs fewer politicians and more leaders. The only way we are going to see true change is if voters start voting for true leaders at the polls. If they get to the U.S. House and fall in line, we should replace them in two years. If a U.S. senator joins the followers and not the leaders, get rid of him or her in six years.
This nation is crying out for men and women of conscience and principle to stand up, make a clarion call to lead and then do it. But as long as we're willing to accept impotent politicians, the next generation will still be howling about fixing the messes we see right now.
Roland S. Martin is an award-winning CNN analyst and the author of the forthcoming book "The First: President Barack Obama's Road to the White House as originally reported by Roland S. Martin." Please visit his website at www.RolandSMartin.com. To find out more about Roland S. Martin and read his past columns, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM