opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Roland Martin
Roland S. Martin
8 Aug 2014
Students Need Hard-Core Truth for College Choices

As I ran to the lobby to make a phone call during the awards dinner at the National Association of Black … Read More.

16 Jul 2014
Senator Rand Paul Is Not Afraid of Black People

There is no white Republican elected official today who is coming close to Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul's effort … Read More.

20 Jun 2014
Black Elites Look Silly Over 'My Brother's Keeper' Criticism

There is no more endangered figure in America than the black man. A cursory look at the education system, the … Read More.

Romney's Campaign GPS Ignores the Poor


In the 1,257 GOP debates we've had to sit through, poverty and the poor has rarely come up. So it was no surprise that Mitt Romney would be dismissive of them in an interview this week with CNN's Soledad O'Brien.

If Romney and his fellow Republican candidates haven't bothered to shed much attention on the poor (the same goes for the debate moderators), why should we think the richest guy in the field would really give a flip about them?

"I'm not concerned about the very poor," Romney said. "There's a safety net there, and if it needs repair, I'll fix it. I'm not concerned about the very rich; they're doing just fine. I'm concerned about the heart of America, the 95 percent of Americans who are right now struggling."

In his comment, he appeared to be clueless. Oh, sure, he said he wasn't worried about the rich as well, but clearly he has made no attempt to advance a plan that speaks to the poor in the country.

When given a chance by O'Brien to clarify the comment, Romney just doubled down. And later, on his campaign plane, he screwed it up again.

"Wealthy people are doing fine," Romney said. "But my focus in the campaign is on middle-income people. Of course I'm concerned about all Americans — poor, wealthy, middle-class — but the focus of my effort will be on middle-income families who I think have been most hurt by the Obama economy."

Seriously, do the guy's dollars signs prevent his brain from understanding the real plight of the poor in this country? So he's "concerned" about all Americans, including the poor, but the "focus" of his effort will be on the middle-class. Why can't the focus be on those not rich?

The fundamental problem with these candidates is that the poor in America are often ignored. Last year, I was highly critical of President Barack Obama for not even saying the word "poor" in his State of the Union speech.

All of these candidates, including President Obama, love to go to manufacturing facilities, hold chats in the living rooms of suburban homeowners, and target their messaging to the vaunted middle class.

But when was the last time we saw a president or presidential candidate go into rural America and speak to the poorest of the poor? How often have we seen them visit a public housing complex or another venue where a true light can be shone on those most affected?

When Bobby Kennedy decided to run for president in 1968, he got out of his rich, Hyannis Port, Mass., environment and went on a listening and seeing tour of the most depressed areas in America. For the first time, Kennedy got a sight of the America that he had never envisioned.

President Obama knows what that looks like. As a community organizer, he had to go into those places and work with people there to improve their plight. Does the GPS in Mitt Romney's car even know where those areas are?

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 15.3 percent of Americans live in poverty on a salary of a little bit more than $22,000 for a family of four. Trust me, those families pulling in $30,000 wouldn't think for a second they were a part of the nation's middle class.

If Romney truly wants to be president, he sure as heck needs to not be dismissive of the nation's poor. In fact, he should be willing to listen to them, understand how hard many of them work, and determine what policies he can advance that will help them graduate from poverty to the next level. Romney — and all of the candidates — should make discussions with the poor a part of their agenda.

America must stop appealing to the nation's middle class just in an effort to grab votes. Yeah, that's exactly what it is; a pandering exercise. We can't treat the poor as if they are invisible and not worth our time and attention.

Unfortunately, the poor don't have lobbyists, and a lot of people really don't want to hear their stories. But they are our mothers, fathers, brothers, sisters, aunts, uncles, nephews and nieces. Are we so cold and callous that we'll treat them with such disregard?

Roland S. Martin is an award-winning CNN analyst and author of the book "The First: President Barack Obama's Road to the White House as Originally Reported by Roland S. Martin." Please visit his website at To find out more about Roland S. Martin and read his past columns, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at



3 Comments | Post Comment
I suspect Romney knows more about the poor that you think-for one thing, he gives more to charily than any of the other candidates, and the Mormon Church has a very effective social welfare program to move people out of poverty. He could do worse than encourage other organizations and ministries to use some of their ideas. I don't say the government should do it because their record of welfare programs is too much ideology, bureacracy, graft and waste.
Comment: #1
Posted by: partsmom
Wed Feb 8, 2012 6:24 PM
Actually, the government's War on Poverty has made the poor worse off and the bureaucrats rich. The Mormon Church has much more effective poverty and welfare programs, and Romney gives more to charity than any other candidate. I'll bet he knows about poverty, and that it's better to keep the government out of that pie.
Comment: #2
Posted by: partsmom
Wed Feb 8, 2012 6:29 PM
This column reminds me of a video I recently watched of a DJ whose audience included many "underserved" (poor). He raised these very questions to a female political candidate appearing on his show I suppose for exposure and to get her message out. He was extremely forceful in his verbage and tone as this politician attempted the usual spin answers to his very pertinent questions. He did not allow the spin insisting she answer the question(s) and not pay lip service as most politicians will. Two things happened: frustrated, he kicked her out of his studio,frustrated, she walked out on the show. He may be perceived as bullying a woman, I don't think so. He was bullying, but he was bullying a politician. Equal rights, baby! Politicians don't want to deal with the poor. On his GPS show yesterday on CNN (2/12/12), Fareek spoke on the plight and number of poor within the US and how we stood with the rest of the world. I don't know if "the meek" is synonymous with "the poor", some say it is. I do know unless we address poverty in this country, there is no way the meek or the poor will inherit the earth. It's all owned by the wealthy.
By the way, Roland, time for you to grow up. Homophobic jokes are something we grow out of, not something we perpetuate. Not even on your own time. I completely agree with CNN, cause you 'ain't all that'!
Comment: #3
Posted by: demecra zydeem
Mon Feb 13, 2012 11:48 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Roland S. Martin
Aug. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Veronique de RugyUpdated 11 Feb 2016
Matt Towery
Matt ToweryUpdated 11 Feb 2016
Froma Harrop
Froma HarropUpdated 11 Feb 2016

3 Apr 2009 Why Aren't Celebrities Adopting US Kids?

15 Jun 2012 Israel Wrong to Demand Release of American Traitor

13 Mar 2009 Obama, Dems Wrong To Kill School Vouchers