creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Roland Martin
Roland S. Martin
8 Aug 2014
Students Need Hard-Core Truth for College Choices

As I ran to the lobby to make a phone call during the awards dinner at the National Association of Black … Read More.

16 Jul 2014
Senator Rand Paul Is Not Afraid of Black People

There is no white Republican elected official today who is coming close to Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul's effort … Read More.

20 Jun 2014
Black Elites Look Silly Over 'My Brother's Keeper' Criticism

There is no more endangered figure in America than the black man. A cursory look at the education system, the … Read More.

Rev. Billy Graham and His Narrow Biblical Principles

Comment

To all of my fellow evangelicals on the religious right, please, stop your fake proselytizing and trumpeting of biblical values if all you're going to do is run roughshod over your biblical convictions in order for your partisan views to take center stage.

When Mitt Romney was running for the GOP presidential nomination, a number of individuals on the religious right were highly critical of his faith, with some even calling Mormonism a cult. The Southern Baptist Convention has long taught that Mormonism is a cult. Yet, when Romney secured the GOP nomination, these same Bible-believing leaders were quick to set that aside to back Romney.

The Rev. Billy Graham and his Billy Graham Evangelistic Association have decided to scrub from his website any mention of Mormonism as a cult. This was done in the wake of a meeting with Romney and the release of a newspaper ad that endorses the GOP nominee.

With the release of a newspaper ad set to run across the country, it is clear that Graham, long been called by others as "America's pastor," has forgotten portions of the Bible.

The copy of the ad says: "The legacy we leave behind for our children, grandchildren and this great nation is critical. As I approach my 94th birthday, I realize this election could be my last. I believe it is vitally important that we cast our ballots for candidates who base their decisions on biblical principles and support the nation of Israel. I urge you to vote for those who protect the sanctity of life and support the biblical definition of marriage between a man and a woman. Vote for biblical values this November 6, and pray with me that America will remain one nation under God."

So Graham is saying vote for someone who bases their decisions on "biblical principles," "support the nation of Israel," "protect the sanctity of life" and "support the biblical definition of marriage between a man and a woman."

That's it. Nothing else. That's essentially what he is characterizing as "biblical principles."

How pathetic.

Oh, I'll gladly take heat for criticizing a revered figure like Billy Graham. This is an obviously gross distortion of the Word of God to fit his political point of view. It's shameful when those on the left do it and just as bad when the religious right does it.

The teachings of Jesus Christ are filled with numerous examples of the Son of God helping the needy, feeding the hungry, healing the sick and wounded, and taking to task the haves for ignoring the have-nots.

The Bible talks about Jesus spending his time with social outcasts, not basking in the glow of the 1 percent.

Why is it that Graham, and so many others on the religious right, wants to isolate the Bible to only abortion and gay marriage? Does the rest of it matter? Are we to tell Bible believers that one or two issues matters more than any other?

So, Rev.

Graham, why no mention of the poor, the sick or the needy in your newspaper ad?

Oh, I know the history of the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association with helping those in need, as well as that of his son, Franklin Graham, through Samaritan's Purse. But isn't it worth mentioning and advocating these issues to our presidential candidates?

I wonder what the Catholic bishops and nuns feel about Graham not thinking Bible believers should cast their ballots on the issue of healthcare. Should Bible believers not be concerned with the massive cuts to programs to help the poor advocated by Rep. Paul Ryan? Should Bible believers know about the fatherhood initiative launched by President Obama to shore up families and to confront the crisis of fatherless homes? Is that not something Jesus would be proud of? Should Bible believers be concerned about the candidates' stance on guns and gun violence? Is that not a biblical issue, Rev. Graham? Should Bible believers be concerned about who prefers to end wars across the globe? Rev. Graham, should Bible believers vote on who is best able to end the prison industrial complex that is destroying this country fiscally? Should Bible believers know who is more concerned about the rich getting richer and everyone else having to help pay for their yachts and planes?

Seriously, Rev. Graham, are these not moral issues that should be considered by Bible believers?

Over the last 30 years, the religious right has perverted the Bible to fit their narrow view of what Christians should pay attention to. Abortion and homosexuality. That's it. Nothing else matters.

Well my Bible is bigger than that. My faith is bigger than that. And my Jesus Christ cares about more than abortion and homosexuality. Please, make your case about those two issues, that's fine. But don't talk to me, Rev. Graham, Franklin Graham or any other right wing evangelical about the sanctity of life when you were silent about Trayvon Martin being gunned down or police brutality taking the lives of innocent Americans.

Franklin Graham loves to talk about Christians being persecuted in the Middle East, and I applaud him for that. But does not he care to mention Christians under attack in inner city America thanks to a proliferation of guns and drugs? Care to challenge Bible believers to vote based on that? Or will the National Rifle Association get mad?

Please, don't you dare tell me, an evangelical, Christian author married to an ordained minister, that biblical principles only cover four issues. I prefer to have an expansive view of Jesus, rather than a narrow one.

I refuse to think the biblical and social justice issues touted by the Revs. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Fred Shuttlesworth, Ralph Abernathy, C.T. Vivian and countless other pastors during Civil Rights Movement, are not worth the consideration of today's Bible believers.

Support who you want, Rev. Graham, but don't dare limit the scope of biblical values to what I can count with on one hand.

Roland S. Martin is an award-winning CNN analyst and author of the book "The First: President Barack Obama's Road to the White House as Originally Reported by Roland S. Martin." Please visit his website at RolandSMartin.com. To find out more about Roland S. Martin and read his past columns, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM



Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
I think it is sad when we asy we will let nothing seperate us from the love of GOD, and then fall into the trap of the devil with politics.
Comment: #1
Posted by: LeRoy Hunt, Jr.
Mon Oct 22, 2012 6:24 AM
Tthe program of social justice inevitably involves claims for government provision of goods, paid for through the efforts of others, the term actually refers to an intention to use force to acquire one's desires. Not to earn desirable goods by rational thought and action, production and voluntary exchange, but to go in there and forcibly take goods from those who can supply them!
On the other hand Paul wrote, He who does not work, neither shall he eat...II Thessalonians 3:10
Comment: #2
Posted by: David Henricks
Mon Oct 22, 2012 2:31 PM
This is a discussion I have been having with my Christian friends for years. Many of them go to churches where the pastors preach on "Vote the Bible," but the only one people to vote on two to three issues and not the entire Bible. The Bible says not to speak evil of dignitaries, and to obey those who have rule over you, and to do unto the least of God's people. They quote the part of 1 Cor 6:9 that states "homosexuals and effeminates will not inherit the kingdom of God, but they leave out the fact that neither will adulterers or fornicators, because if they did include adulterers or fornicators, they would be disqualified; even many of the pastors, deacons, and choir directors in their churches. Gal 5:21 says that murderers, drunkerds, and partiers will not inherit the kingdom, but that does not fit their narrative. The republican platform says that traditional marriage should be between one man and one woman, but many who espouse this have been married to more than one wife (John McCain, Ronald Reagan, Newt Gingrich, etc, etc). I believe it is false and disingenious for Christians to say they are voting the Bible when they are actually voting a couple of Bible verses.
Comment: #3
Posted by: James Jordan
Mon Oct 29, 2012 5:38 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Roland S. Martin
Aug. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 22 Sep 2014
Deb Saunders
Debra J. SaundersUpdated 21 Sep 2014
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 21 Sep 2014

17 Feb 2012 Props to NCAA for Banning Connecticut From March Madness

15 Aug 2011 Texas A&M Would Be Nuts to Leave Big 12 for SEC

2 Apr 2010 Catholic Church Leaders Wrong to Play Victim in Sex Abuse Scandals