creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Roland Martin
Roland S. Martin
3 Feb 2012
Romney's Campaign GPS Ignores the Poor

In the 1,257 GOP debates we've had to sit through, poverty and the poor has rarely come up. So it was no … Read More.

27 Jan 2012
The Hypocrisy of America's Cuba Policy

For more than 50 years, the United States has had an embargo against the island of Cuba, all because we … Read More.

20 Jan 2012
So Long to the Party of Family Values

When someone asks when the Republican Party abandoned its longstanding position as the party of family values,… Read More.

Obama's Press Office Needs Diversity

Share Comment

A lot of media outlets made a big deal out of the mostly white White House press corps covering the first black president, and those stories were worth pursuing.

All of us in the business know full well that those are considered plum jobs and are steppingstones to greater things.

But while we hold the media accountable for the need to diversify their ranks, it's quite telling to see the lack of diversity in the White House's press office.

I got an e-mail Tuesday listing all of the various press folks and contact information, and hardly any African-Americans or Hispanics were listed. Granted, the deputy press secretary is African-American, and the director of broadcast media is Hispanic. But that's not sufficient.

Unfortunately, this shouldn't come as a shock because the campaign press staff of then-Sen. Barack Obama was just as weak on diversity.

Just because there is a black president doesn't mean that diversity should be cast aside. President Obama should be held to the same standard when it comes to this issue as any other occupier of that office. I am a former national board member of the National Association of Black Journalists, and my support for diversity never wavers, no matter who is running the show.

One of the reasons this is important is — just like in the media, where there are bigger and better things awaiting White House correspondents — a position in the White House press office positions someone for the next level.

When the press secretary leaves, the president normally chooses the next one from those ranks. We never have seen a black or Hispanic press secretary standing at the podium giving daily briefings, and when there is none on the bench, well, that streak will continue.

Looking at the roster of other offices, I don't believe there's even one African-American or Hispanic who is the primary spokesperson or No. 2 at any of the major departments, such as Treasury, State and Justice.

These coveted positions often lead to the top jobs in communications firms in Washington and across the country, and even junior staffers now are tapped for senior jobs in the next administration. (Look at how many junior staffers on former President Bill Clinton's team are now senior staffers for President Obama.)

Various reports have stated that Obama was bothered by the lack of diversity among his campaign team, yet he wasn't moved to do anything about it.

Now I'm hearing the same when it comes to his senior staff, and that is clearly the case in his press office.

The election of President Obama means that one barrier, albeit a major one, has been torn down. But that doesn't mean that others don't need to come tumbling down, as well. For those groups that have been marginalized often, it's important to have the doors of opportunity opened.

If diversity truly matters, then it must be emphasized and realized from the top down. The company leaders in corporate diversity got there because certain CEOs made it clear that it mattered, and they demanded that their underlings made it reality.

Al Neuharth is a prime example. Were it not for his fierce leadership on diversity, Gannett never would have outpaced the media industry when it came to minorities and women being publishers, general managers and executives among the company's media properties. He set the gold standard for advocating diversity in media.

If change is truly what this president wants to bring to bear, let's see change across the board. He should make it clear that the clubby atmosphere in Washington of hire-who-you-know has gone out the window, and that window has been opened up for the next generation of talented individuals. The power positions matter a lot in the nation's capital, and when you have a seat at the table, that's what counts.

I'm used to getting e-mails from folks who say it's wrong for me to look at this through a racial lens and that we now live in a post-racial world. But trust me; if I got an e-mail listing all men, I would be the first to ask, "Where are the women?" If I've pushed the need for diversity at every mainstream media operation I've worked at, why would I be silent about it in the Obama administration?

I've been told that not all hiring has been completed in the White House press office and in other areas. OK, fine. But the A-team clearly has been hired, and that means anyone else coming in the door is on the B-team. And that just won't cut it.

Diversity has tremendous value in this country, and you don't get there by lauding it. You get there by doing it. And that challenge should be met by all CEOs, whether they are black or white, in the Fortune 500, or the president of the United States.

Roland S. Martin is an award-winning CNN contributor and the author of "Listening to the Spirit Within: 50 Perspectives on Faith." Please visit his Web site at www.RolandSMartin.com. To find out more about Roland S. Martin and read his past columns, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
It is not the color Black or White it's the content of the vessel thias man is an honest upright human being, this I knew the first time I heard him speak in 2006, I knew at that time thjat thins is the man of the hour, Barack thinks like my own son, who thinks like me, my son's father myself, I have two sons or had two living ones, and Barack would be the youngest of the two. This man has a heart of Gold, and the compassion of an (anointed) Son who showed up at the correct time in History. I myself am a white man of Seventy and then some. So I was not borrn yesterday. and I am a student of History, and Religious History of nations including the grand ole USA

celestials1938@msn.com
TEL: 740-259-5774
So-it-goes!

Comment: #1
Posted by: Sumner M. Koch
Fri Feb 6, 2009 10:10 AM
“Incredible”
IT SEEMS INCREDIBLE, AT FIRST THOUGHT, that an act can be both right and wrong. But when we see the sinfulness [wrongfulness] un-righteousness of the act, not in the deed itself, but its relation to those whom it affects, it is not difficult to see how any given action may be both good and bad. We can place almost any conceivable deed into two opposite environments and transform it from a crime into that which is commendable, and vise versa. Circumstances provide the moral clothing of human activities. The eating of fruit is often urged as an aid to health. And such is usually is. Yet this was that which introduced disease into the world!
No act is sin [a mistake] “ missing the ideal” itself. Under some conditions it may be right. In others it is wrong. A kiss is usually much more just, but the kiss of Judas is among the basest of all crimes. The morality of any deed lies not in the action but in its relation to those concerned with it. Sin “ missing the mark” [a mistake] is relative, not absolute.
It is no sin for the state to kill, even though it is the penalty of an individual for the same act. There is no essential difference an execution and a murder. Both define a violent death. But in one case it is done with due to authority; in the other it is a defiance of the law of the land.
The great doctrine of justification consists of surrounding our sins [missing the mark, or the ideal] with a divine environment in which they are not merely covered, but actually transmuted into just deeds which will be vindicated before the bar of universal justice. How could it be otherwise? No earthly judge can vindicate a crime, or acquit a criminal, or justify what has been done unless the circumstances of the case warrant it. Such a tribunal cannot declare it righteous, for it cannot change the circumstances attending the crime. The thought of such a case comes to mind as I write. A few years ago a convict, a woman, I think as I recall in Texas, received the gift of God after conviction. We will assume that she was guilty of manslaughter. At any rate, she was sentenced to death. Anyone acquainted with the grace of God would naturally desire to do something to save such a person from the penalty. I should like to be able to justify one before men who has already been justified before God.
But, how could it be done? If the dead victim could be brought back to life after his temporary death proven to be an actual benefit to him as well as all others affected by it, even an earthly Judge would revise his decision. Why condemn a man for doing what eventuated in another's good, even if his own motive was bad and the apparent effect disastrous? No matter one man may hate another, no matter how much evil he may attempt to do to him, if he fails in his fell designs or is checkmated by another, no earthly court can convict him of the intended crime. Man is the sport of Circumstance and circumstances are the servants of God.
So it is that God will deal with this deed. If the victim had, by some means, been restored to life, the charge would have to be dismissed. This is just what God will do. He will raise him from the dead, and thus conclusively cancel the charge of murder. If the case had been reviewed as an attempt to do harm, the victim himself would plead for acquittal if it actually resulted in good. The God who has the power to raise the dead is not helpless in the smaller affairs of life. This dreadful deed, deserving of death, according to every human standard, has been STRIKEN from the DOCKET of the SUPREME COURT OF THE UNIVERSE.

à Romans.11: 36.
The Riddle of the Universe!
Ephesians. 1: 1 – 14. God is operating “All” in accord with the counsel of His “will”!
Not His wish.

So-It-Goes!
[2. Corinthians.5: 20].
Sumner Morrill Koch
Comment: #2
Posted by: Sumner M. Koch
Fri Feb 6, 2009 10:14 AM
God Promised a Beneficent New World Order
God promised a spirit filled descendent of King David would lead and adjudicate His chosen People?
“A shoot, stem or sprig {Christ} will spring up from the stump of Jesse (father of King David); from his roots a Branch will bear fruit. The Spirit of the Lord will rest on him --- the spirit of wisdom and of understanding, the spirit of counsel and of power, the spirit of knowledge and of fear of the Lord. He will not judge by what he sees with his eyes, or decide by what he hears with His ears; but with righteousness will He adjudicate (set things right) for the needy; with love will he will give decisions for the poor of the earth… Righteousness will be His belt and faithfulness the sash around His waist”
(Isaiah.11: 1 – 5).
PS. We can depend on God our Celestial Abba {Daddy} Father He keeps all His promises in His time. “His Mercy never fails”
à “1938” à (1948 1958 1968 1978 1988 1998 2008) “60 years” is or was reckoned as a generation by the ancient Hebrew nation (Jewish) culture!
{1948 1958 1968 1978 1988 1998 2008} = 60 à beginning
1938-2009=70 or (7+1= (8) = Supra-perfection…
Is this that generation Jesus spoke of in Matt. 24:1-- 27—37??
Comment: #3
Posted by: Sumner M. Koch
Fri Feb 6, 2009 10:17 AM
Friends this year before it comes to a close we will have universal health care most if not all who desire a job will have one before the end of 2009 also the troops will be safley home from war. there many good and wonderful things in the offing

So keep your chin up
(SMK) 1938
Comment: #4
Posted by: Sumner M. Koch
Fri Feb 6, 2009 10:20 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Roland S. Martin
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 15 Feb 2012

2 Jan 2009 Pay Rod Gives Democrats Fits with Senate Choice

15 Jun 2007 Dems Should Invest in Poor Whites??

15 Aug 2008 Media's Job Is To Focus on Facts, Not Rumors