Dr. James Dobson, founder of Focus on the Family, is in the news as of late for ripping Sen. Barack Obama over a 2006 speech dealing with faith and public policy.

My issue isn't the speech or Dobson's criticism. I want to know why in the world we in the media keep holding Dobson up as an influential Christian leader or evangelical leader when the guy says with his own mouth that is nothing of the sort?

In a radio interview discussing the speech, Dobson was critical of Obama for saying: "And even if we did have only Christians in our midst, if we expelled every non-Christian from the United States of America, whose Christianity would we teach in the schools? Would it be James Dobson's or Al Sharpton's?"

Dobson took offense to that and made this interesting comment: "I am not a reverend. I'm not a minister. I'm not a theologian. I'm not an evangelist. I'm a psychologist. I have a Ph.D. in child development from the University of Southern California. And there is no equivalence to us."

Yeah. I had the same reaction you likely did. Here is a guy who is often declared a religious leader who now says: "Nope. Not me."

Now, if the guy who is held up as an evangelical leader says he's not, then why do we even care what he has to say about religion? Why even play up his reaction to an Obama speech — or even his criticism of McCain — in a religious discussion, when that's where it shouldn't be?

This is part of the problem when religious conservatives and nonreligious conservatives try as mightily as they can to roll moral issues, family values and religious values all into one ball.

They are not.

For instance, the Rev. Jerry Falwell was the leader of the Moral Majority, which advocated a host of "moral" issues that didn't have a particular religious bent. This has been seen as a Christian movement, but you can be a moral person and not be a Christian.

Later, the Rev. Pat Robertson launched the Christian Coalition, which was much more religiously focused than anything before.

In the past few years, we've seen Dobson — by virtue of his radio show on Christian radio stations, columns and Web site — be seen as a major figure in the religious movement. But he's not, and it's about time that we stop associating him that way.

There are a number of people in this country who are religious and who choose not to identify themselves with either of the major political parties. And this is one of the reasons. The commingling of "family values" with religion seems to provide certain groups with a sort of authoritarian voice on such issues when they don't deserve the platform.

It's fine to call Dobson a family values leader, if you will. But don't insult those individuals in the faith community who are truly ministers, reverends, theologians and evangelists. They've earned it.

Dobson's just a psychologist with a doctorate in child development. So his views on religion are just his; he's not a faith leader of millions.

Roland S. Martin is an award-winning CNN contributor and the author of "Listening to the Spirit Within: 50 Perspectives on Faith." Please visit his Web site at www.RolandSMartin.com. To find out more about Roland S. Martin and read his past columns, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.