creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Roland Martin
Roland S. Martin
17 Feb 2012
Props to NCAA for Banning Connecticut From March Madness

March Madness is usually a wild and crazy time on the campuses of the nation's big-time college basketball … Read More.

3 Feb 2012
Romney's Campaign GPS Ignores the Poor

In the 1,257 GOP debates we've had to sit through, poverty and the poor has rarely come up. So it was no … Read More.

27 Jan 2012
The Hypocrisy of America's Cuba Policy

For more than 50 years, the United States has had an embargo against the island of Cuba, all because we … Read More.

Clinton Redefines What Experience Is

Share Comment

A good assessment of how a candidate successfully takes a message and makes a mark on voters is when you begin to read and hear the person repeat it over and over in calls, e-mails and on radio talk shows.

After getting blown away by Sen. Barack Obama in Iowa, Sen. Hillary Clinton knew that she needed to change her position to combat the agent-of-change language presented by Obama. It was clear that just talking about her experience as first lady wasn't enough because taking credit for all the good done by the administration of President Bill Clinton also meant assuming the bad.

But what Hillary Clinton has done is reframe her experience by expanding it beyond the seven years she's served in the U.S. Senate. Now you hear her talk about having 35 years of experience as a change agent.

The key part really isn't being an advocate for change, but the emphasis on 35 years.

And it has caught on because I've noticed the phrase taking foot among the electorate, and now they are repeating it.

Judging by her résumé, the 60-year-old Clinton has decided to reach back and suggest that all the work she has done since graduating from college matters. The compare and contrast is that with Obama being 46, Clinton is suggesting that she has been working on issues since her chief rival was still in junior high school.

Ouch.

During the debate before the New Hampshire primary, Clinton forcefully made the point, seeking to establish her credentials over a long period of time.

That was evident during the final stages of the campaign in the Granite State, where she chose to go toward a policy-oriented stump speech, rather than hit all the usual talking points.

And now, with the economy roaring to the top of the agenda as to what concerns America the most, this is going to become even more critical.

The biggest knock on Obama's campaign has been Clinton defining him as being inexperienced, even though it is true that he's served longer as an elected official (11 years) than Clinton (seven).

The Obama campaign has failed to respond adequately to this change in Clinton's tactics.

Even during the debate, Obama sat idly by as Clinton efficiently made the argument, allowing the point to be hammered home.

If his team continues to let experience become a strong anthem, they will pay for it because, for the most part, the rest of the states will require getting traditional Democratic voters out to the polls. New Hampshire was big on low- to middle-income and blue-collar voters, and they find Clinton appealing, while upper-income voters prefer Obama.

Now that South Carolina is coming up on Jan. 26, along with states such as Virginia, Alabama, Tennessee and others, pocketbook issues will be vital, and not the war. That goes up Clinton's alley.

One way for the Obama campaign to connect with these critical voters is to stop having Obama just say he worked as a community organizer. What does that really mean?

He has to paint the picture of going into the public housing complexes of Chicago, helping people get needed services. He must say that he drove a beat-up car to the West Side and South Side to sign people up to vote. He must say that his experience in the streets — laid out as explicitly as possible — is the kind of experience that he will reflect on and use when sitting in the Oval Office. He should explain how his mom had to go on food stamps to feed the family. He should tell the audience that he and Michelle paid off their student loans just three years ago.

Voters are worried about rising tuition costs and the ability to maintain a decent standard of living. They want someone who will speak from the heart, make it clear that he hears them and offer solutions to their problems when he gets to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

As of now, Clinton is winning the experience battle by changing the definition, and that could be the turning point as the election moves forward.

Roland S. Martin is an award-winning CNN contributor and the author of "Listening to the Spirit Within: 50 Perspectives on Faith." Please visit his Web site at www.rolandsmartin.com. To find out more about Roland S. Martin and read his past columns, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
Looks like Mr. Martin has redefined the meaning of "blown away". Hillary Clinton was not "blown away" in Iowa. Obama walked away with only one delegate more than Clinton. That's about a tie in everybody else's book.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Maezeppa
Tue Jan 29, 2008 11:58 AM
Mr. Martin spins his pro-Hillary tale as professionally as my grandma spun her wool.
"35 years of experience for change?" That is about as senseless as "they hate us for our freedoms."

No one is repeating that meme, not even Hillary supporters who attack the slightest adverse fact on so many blogs.
In law, if the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If both the law and facts are against you, Argue. Martin has taken that adage, and adapted it to support hillary. His "Some say," and "People are now repeating" comments is simply made up, unsupportable, and frankly, untrue.

What a shame. Martin is a talented script reader, he sounds convincing, and when his teleprompter scripts are accurate, he both looks and sounds good. Unfortunately, when he touches on the subject of Hillary, his teleprompter seems to have been bought off by the likes of Mark Penn and Howard Wolfson, hardly people of integrity, honesty or accuracy. By repeating the campaign line, Martin reminds us more of that former White House stenographer, Judy Miller, than a trustworthy news person.

Shame on you, Mr. Martin. Shame.
Comment: #2
Posted by: pastorAgnostic
Wed Jan 30, 2008 3:46 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Roland S. Martin
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 20 Feb 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 19 Feb 2012

3 Feb 2012 Romney's Campaign GPS Ignores the Poor

2 Feb 2007 How to Make Journalism Better? Find More Writers Like Molly Ivins

16 Sep 2011 GOP Blows off Latinos in CNN/Tea Party Express Debate