creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Roger Simon
Roger Simon
25 May 2012
Businessmen Make Lousy Presidents

My experience with vulture capitalism is limited. A vulture could not make even a snack out of my capital. I don'… Read More.

23 May 2012
Is Mitt Romney Count Dracula?

In the end, it won't be about who raises the most money. It won't be about who ate a dog or kept one on the … Read More.

18 May 2012
Poll Results Are “Massaged” Before They Are Released

I promise you this is not another one of my columns about how polls suck. Point One: You already know polls suck.… Read More.

The GOP Cuts Its Own Throat

Share Comment

If a politician tells you he is going to solve your problems by passing a constitutional amendment, you can tell he is treating you like a sap.

And that's because the likelihood of a constitutional amendment actually being ratified these days is about the same as Lindsay Lohan winning "Jeopardy!"

But just because something is nearly impossible doesn't mean you can't find a politician willing to promise it.

Sick and tired of hordes of pregnant illegal immigrants sneaking into our country so they can have babies who automatically become American citizens under the 14th Amendment?

Well, let's change the 14th Amendment by passing a new amendment! Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said on Fox News a couple of weeks ago: "I may introduce a constitutional amendment that changes the rules if you have a child here. Birthright citizenship I think is a mistake, that we should change our Constitution and say if you come here illegally and you have a child, that child's automatically not a citizen."

Asked if he was really serious about introducing an amendment, Graham said, "I got to."

Given the Postal Service's new Priority Mail Flat Rate Boxes, it might be physically easier to ship babies back to their mother's country of origin, but passing a new amendment is very, very difficult.

Since the Constitution took effect in 1789, there have been more than 11,000 attempts to amend it. But do you know how many have been ratified in those 221 years? Just 27, and that includes the Bill of Rights, the first 10.

True, the last one, the 27th Amendment, dealing with congressional pay raises, was finally ratified in 1992. But it was first proposed in 1789.

So if you have a pet peeve and a couple of hundred years or so to wait, a constitutional amendment is definitely the way to go.

For politicians, supporting a constitutional amendment is often a way of getting loonies off their backs. So it was with the "Flag Burning Amendment," better known as the solution without a problem.

Admitting that nobody was actually going around burning flags anymore, lawmakers wanted them to stop doing it anyway.

At least in election years. And because the Supreme Court has ruled that burning the flag is a form of free speech, year after year lawmakers have sought to pass an amendment banning flag desecration so they could go back home and tell voters they made America safe for flags.

Such an amendment has never passed. But fooling around with the 14th Amendment, as Graham and others now say they "got to" do, is a lot more important and emotional to a lot more people because the 14th Amendment is so critical to the life of our nation (think anti-slavery, due process of law, applying the Bill of Rights to the states, the foundation for Brown v. Board of Education, etc.).

Some Republicans have made public statements similar to Graham's, but Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) has tried to soft-pedal the issue. And maybe that's because McConnell is looking at the bigger picture.

The Hispanic vote grows more powerful in this country every year. Our four largest states by population are California, Texas, New York and Florida. Our four largest states ranked by Hispanic population are California, Texas, Florida and New York.

In presidential elections, two of those states, New York and California, have been reliably Democratic. One, Texas, has been reliably Republican, and one, Florida, leans Republican.

But the significant Hispanic populations in Texas and Florida could turn those states Democratic. And immigration may be the issue that starts the turning. True, a significant percentage of the Hispanic population in Florida is Cuban-American, and Cuban immigrants are affected by different laws. But attacks on immigrants and the citizenship status of their children easily could be an issue that unifies Hispanics.

If that happens, here is the simple arithmetic: Between them, California, Texas, Florida and New York currently have 147 electoral votes, or 54 percent of the votes you need to win the presidency.

So a Republican candidate for president could start off in a hole that he or she could never climb out of.

Whipping up the base with talk about getting tough on illegal immigrants and their "anchor babies" through constitutional amendments may sound like a good idea to some Republicans now, but they may just be sharpening the scalpel to cut their own party's throat.

To find out more about Roger Simon, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate webpage at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
How about this for a solution... You Liberal morons stop cheating on your taxes (Gheitner, half of the ObaMao Regime anyone?), then you lot can pay whole sale for the Illegals and their spawn, and everyone who opposes giving money to Illegals on the basis that they are breaking our laws don't. Sound fair? What?! You don't want to give them any of your money? Well hells bells, I thought you Liberals were in favor of doing just that... What? Oh, I see, its everyone ELSE that should do it, you just want to tell us we should because its being "compassionate." Oh, well, I guess I am just an evil bastard for wanting Illegals to follow our laws and leave, and for our own government to enforce its own laws and its constitutional duties. Silly me! I bow to your superior intellect that has brought us this logical argument, it making SOOOO much sense.

Oh yeah, when 70% of the country agreed with the Arizona enforcement law I couldn't help but notice that Libtards such as yourselves completely dismissed that, as Liberals tend to do in the face of facts and overwhelming odds... So, I have a feeling, and its based on factual information not ideology, that amending the constitution to do away with Anchor Babies is a VERY popular idea.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Charles
Wed Aug 11, 2010 5:27 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Roger Simon
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

4 Jul 2008 Out of Failure, America Finds Success

4 Dec 2009 Hunters Thin the Human Herd

7 Dec 2011 The Passion of Newt