creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Roger Simon
Roger Simon
25 May 2012
Businessmen Make Lousy Presidents

My experience with vulture capitalism is limited. A vulture could not make even a snack out of my capital. I don'… Read More.

23 May 2012
Is Mitt Romney Count Dracula?

In the end, it won't be about who raises the most money. It won't be about who ate a dog or kept one on the … Read More.

18 May 2012
Poll Results Are “Massaged” Before They Are Released

I promise you this is not another one of my columns about how polls suck. Point One: You already know polls suck.… Read More.

Sarah Palin at the Top

Share Comment

More than 13 months ago, I wrote a column that began: "Sarah Palin can be the Republican nominee in 2012. I am not saying she will be, but she can be. Those who underestimate her do so at their own risk."

It was not the most popular column I ever wrote. I remember sniggering and mockery from those who could not find actual vegetables to throw.

As was widely believed at the time, Sarah Palin was an idiot. Her interview with CBS's Katie Couric had proved that. And Palin's approval rating as governor of Alaska, once so high, had plunged to 54 percent. (An approval rating I suspect Barack Obama would love to have today.)

Sarah Palin was a hick and a rube. She was a gun-toting, snow machine-riding pit bull with lipstick, with a family that was portrayed as somewhere between a reality show and white trash.

Now, more than a year later, I have not changed my mind about Palin's political potential. This is not based on the polls — especially a recent one showing her in a 46 percent to 46 percent tie with Obama in a hypothetical 2012 face-off. I don't believe such polls tell us anything meaningful.

I am basing my belief now, as back then, on Palin's ability to connect with the base of her party. Name a bigger name in the Republican Party today. Heck, name any name in the Republican Party today.

And the most energized wing of her party — Republican tea partiers —- have good reason to like her. At a February tea party convention in Nashville, Tenn., Palin told the crowd, "America is ready for another revolution, and you are a part of this." Which set off one of many standing ovations.

Making fun of President Obama, Palin asked the crowd, "How's that hope-y, change-y stuff working out for you?"

She believed what the crowd believed: It wasn't working out very well.

Maybe she wrote those lines on her palm — I don't know. But I don't think the crowd cared, especially when Palin said, "This is about the people, and it's bigger than any one king or queen of a tea party, and it's a lot bigger than any charismatic guy with a teleprompter."

Today, Palin is going around the country endorsing and making speeches for Republican candidates with some success.

Tuesday night in Georgia, former Secretary of State Karen Handel, who was endorsed by Palin, got 34 percent of the vote, while former U.S. Rep. Nathan Deal, endorsed by Newt Gingrich, got 23 percent of the vote. The two will face each other in a runoff for the Republican nomination for governor next month.

(On July 7, 2009, I wrote, "And tell me that a Sarah Palin-Newt Gingrich ticket would not set several conservative hearts aflutter." I still believe it.)

Since unsolicited advice is a columnist's stock-in-trade, I had seven suggestions for Palin, back last summer when she was still governor of Alaska: Dump Alaska, surround yourself with people smarter than you are, pick a handful of issues and stick to them, study up, don't believe you can't do it, don't go changing and don't worry about failure.

Whatever Palin has been doing since then seems to be working. And I have noticed a certain change in how the media are viewing her. In a recent column giving advice to journalists, Marc Ambinder of Atlantic Media wrote: "Be humble about conclusions. ... Sarah Palin may not be ready to be president today, but that doesn't mean she won't be ready to be president tomorrow."

In even better news for Palin, her political opponents continue to dismiss her. Mark Halperin wrote in Time magazine recently, "An adviser to Mitt Romney ... says of Palin, 'She's not a serious human being.'"

Which leads me to believe that Romney needs to get himself some new advisers. Or at least he ought to remind them of the words of the Chinese philosopher Lao Tse, who wrote, "No disaster is greater than underestimating the enemy."

Besides, does the most serious human being always win? Did Al Gore? Did John Kerry?

Sarah Palin has something more than intellect. She has the ability to understand, connect with and energize her party.

And considering her likely opposition — Romney, Gingrich, Tim Pawlenty, Bobby Jindal, Mike Huckabee or Haley Barbour — tell me she has no chance. Go ahead and tell me. It's enough to make one snigger.

To find out more about Roger Simon, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate webpage at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
Bear in mind one thing : You don't need to be a mental giant with the qualifications of God to be a great president. Reagan was by no means a genius level physicist, or a master blacksmith, nor did he have the IQ of Einstein. What he did have was the intangibles of a great leader. He put in position people who were masterful economists, businessmen, negotiators, and military strategists. Out of his Presidency came some of the most prosperous days the US has ever seen.

Then on the other hand you have someone like Obama. He can have all the academic credentials in the world but he's still the worst leader we've had in a century (beating out Carter hands down now) and has put this country on the path to European stye economic ruin. So you don't have to be a mental giant (which Obama is not, actually, he's a foo) to be a great leader. Pain may or may not be that leader, but one thing is for certain... American is ready and will get that leader once ObaMao is booted, either by impeachment for multiple corruption instances or through that most American of ideals : the Constitutional Republic elections.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Charles
Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:25 PM
This is a person whose qualifications are somewhere between very poor and nonexistant and this is our best hope? A sad and terrifying state of affairs. Why don't we aim higher? Is this small minded, mean-spirited woman the best we have to offer? I hope not.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Stark
Fri Jul 23, 2010 11:53 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Roger Simon
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

4 Sep 2009 Twenty-one presidential Vacation No-Nos

23 Oct 2010 The Soft-Porn Soap Opera

11 Nov 2009 Disney World's Idealized America