opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Robert Scheer
Robert Scheer
5 Feb 2016
Crisis of Faith and Football

As a recently suffering Oakland Raiders fan, I greeted the death of Kenny "The Snake" Stabler with a cocktail … Read More.

26 Oct 2015
An Idiotic GOP Is Looking at the Wrong Thing in Its Clinton Probe

The Republicans on that committee investigating Hillary Clinton are idiots for focusing on decisions about … Read More.

19 Oct 2015
Bernie Blew It: He Sold Out Instead of Confronting Clinton

Bernie blew it. By embracing rather than confronting Hillary Clinton, Sen. Sanders fell into the trap of … Read More.

The GOP's Sick Priorities


How deceptive for politicians to stress "entitlements" when they talk about gutting Social Security and Medicare, two programs long paid for by their beneficiaries. The Republicans make it sound as if they're doing us a favor, cutting government waste by seeking to strangle America's two most successful domestic programs. And now Barack Obama seems poised to join their camp in undermining the essential lifeline for most of the nation's seniors, many of whom lost their retirement savings in the banking meltdown.

These threatened programs are not government handouts to a privileged class, like defense contractors and bailed-out bankers, who do feel eminently entitled to pig out at the federal trough. On the contrary, Social Security and Medicare have been funded by a regressive tax that falls disproportionately on working middle-class income earners, while caps in the system leave the wealthy — most notably the hedge fund hustlers who helped cause today's economic crisis — largely untaxed.

While there are many plausible ways to ensure the future of Medicare and Social Security — and extending a fair share of the burden to wealthier individuals is a good place to start — such changes should not be considered in the context of a bargain to raise the debt ceiling. These programs have nothing at all to do with a national debt that has spiraled out of control in the past four years as a result of untethered corporate greed.

In that time, the debt — already inflamed by two wars fought on the credit card while President George W. Bush cut taxes for the wealthy — rose a whopping 50 percent as a consequence of the deepest recession in 70 years, brought on by the banking collapse.

Indeed, the economic turmoil has put considerable pressure on these programs. In the past two years, expenditures for Social Security exceeded non-interest income for the first time since 1983, as the trustees of the fund reported the deficits "are in large part due to the weakened economy." The interest earned on the more than $2.4 trillion in the Social Security trust fund held by the Treasury more than made up the shortfall, and the fund will be able to fulfill its projected obligations, even given the strain of the baby boomers' retirement, until 2036.

Social Security is a particularly weird whipping boy for what ails us, since the program has been solvent since its inception and will be so for the next quarter of a century.

Is there any other public or corporate entity that we can guarantee will be in as good shape for the next 25 years, and even at that point be able to pay 75 percent of its obligations?

Presidents both Republican and Democrat have routinely dipped into the Social Security trust fund to float the national debt, and yet critics from both parties have the effrontery now to treat as some sort of indulgence a program for which seniors, current and future, have paid. Seniors are as much "entitled" to the payback on their investment as the folks who buy Treasury notes, people who will be at the forefront of those protected by a rise in the debt ceiling.

Yes, there are more pressing issues with Medicare. Those have to do with cost containment in the medical industry, a situation aggravated when the Republican Bush expanded prescription drug coverage. Unfortunately, health care cost containment was not a serious focus of Obama's health care reform, and without a national policy alternative, it is difficult to contain the cost for seniors who are medically the most needy and therefore the most vulnerable.

As with the problems of Social Security, the problems of Medicare can be dealt with handily by increasing payments from the wealthier segment of the population. A very limited effort in that direction was included in the Obama health care law, which requires a 0.9 percent increase in Medicare payments beginning in 2013 for couples earning above $250,000.

Even more troubling than potential Medicare cuts is the threat to Medicaid, a program that provides health care to 68 million needy children, disabled individuals, pregnant women and poor seniors. These people are "entitled" to such aid only as a matter of government-recognized decency that has historically been supported by both Republican and Democratic presidents. That Obama is now even considering reducing support for the most vulnerable in the current harsh economy has brought written opposition from two-thirds of Senate Democrats.

It is absurd that Medicaid, along with Medicare and Social Security, is on the chopping block when there is no serious effort to find savings in a defense budget equal to that of the rest of the world's nations combined, and still at Cold War era levels despite the lack of a sophisticated military enemy. And that the GOP-led House has gotten a supposedly progressive president to consider doing serious damage to our most vulnerable population in order to placate Republicans determined to continue massive tax breaks for the wealthy is morally obscene.

Robert Scheer is editor of, where this column originally appeared. E-mail Robert Scheer at To find out more about Robert Scheer, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Webpage at



3 Comments | Post Comment
"Understand, Globalism, 'Free Trade' and EUGENICS
(--and we might add TREASON) are always intertwined.
(essential online coverage as it happens)

----Enough with the FAKE left/right dynamic.

Fabianism -----is Bolshevism ---is Stalinism ----is Nazism ----is Maoism
---is Globalism.

One and all forms of 'So-shall-ALLLLL-ism' ----are, ultimately EUGENICS.
Always were, still are and always will be.

"----and David counted the tribes."

Bankster and heir is toxic-rat ---EUGENICS.

Comment: #1
Posted by: free bee
Thu Jul 14, 2011 12:54 AM
Another useless comment? Stop spamming this community.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Deborah Laymon
Thu Jul 14, 2011 6:38 AM
This article is a good counterpoint to David Limbaugh's column in the conservative section. I liked them both, and they both seem relatively spin free. Years of dipping dirty political fingers into the cookie jars of Medicaid and Social Security has left us in this debt mess. When the government decides to live within its 12 billion dollar a day budget people may be more willing to tax up, but not before we see real cuts. Sorry.

Deborah is right, somebody should cut off the WiFi at the asylum.

Comment: #3
Posted by: Tom
Thu Jul 14, 2011 11:17 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Robert Scheer
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 8 Feb 2016
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 6 Feb 2016
diane dimond
Diane DimondUpdated 6 Feb 2016

17 Mar 2010 Lame Bill From a Lame Duck

3 Oct 2007 The State Department's Murderous Guardians

1 Jul 2009 The System is Evil, Not Madoff