opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Robert Scheer
Robert Scheer
5 Feb 2016
Crisis of Faith and Football

As a recently suffering Oakland Raiders fan, I greeted the death of Kenny "The Snake" Stabler with a cocktail … Read More.

26 Oct 2015
An Idiotic GOP Is Looking at the Wrong Thing in Its Clinton Probe

The Republicans on that committee investigating Hillary Clinton are idiots for focusing on decisions about … Read More.

19 Oct 2015
Bernie Blew It: He Sold Out Instead of Confronting Clinton

Bernie blew it. By embracing rather than confronting Hillary Clinton, Sen. Sanders fell into the trap of … Read More.

The Chinese Aren't Coming


On Tuesday, the Cold War finally ended with a historic trade agreement between China and Taiwan that will dramatically integrate the mainland's economy with that of its claimed breakaway province. Peace has descended on the most contentious point of conflict between East and West for the past six decades — but don't expect the folks at the Pentagon or their military contractors to celebrate. The remaining raison d'etre for much of their $700 billion budget has suddenly collapsed, and with it the claim on huge profits and high-flying careers.

The bulk of that money, higher in constant dollars than at any other time since World War II, is spent on weapons systems to fight a sophisticated Cold War enemy that went out of business with the breakdown of the Soviet Union. And the so-called "war on terror" does not cut it as a substitute excuse for feeding the immense maw of the military-industrial complex. It is laughable to suggest that the ever more complex and costly high-tech weaponry we continue to build is needed to defeat an opponent armed with the box cutters used by the Sept. 11 hijackers or a primitive roadside bomb set off by an Iraqi insurgent.

When Sen. Joe Lieberman makes his annual case for those $2.5 billion submarines produced in his home state of Connecticut, his central argument has been that the Chinese are building equally sophisticated weapons that threaten us. "If we do not move to produce two submarines a year as soon as possible, we are in serious danger of falling behind China," he thundered during one Senate debate. Obviously, it's harder to make the case that submarines are needed to capture al-Qaida terrorists holed up in some landlocked nation's mountain caves. So too with the ever more advanced arsenal designed to penetrate enemy defenses not even built when those Cold War adversaries still operated.

"The Chinese are coming" became the last refuge of war-profiteering scoundrels once the Russians started cutting back dramatically, but this alarm was never plausible. The authoritative quadrennial Defense Department reports have always made clear that China has at most threatened to become a regional power with Taiwan as its focus. Yet that pathetic excuse for the U.S. spending as much on its military as do the rest of the world nations combined seemed plausible to most in Congress who voted for massive military appropriations even as our government had to borrow money from the Chinese to cover our deficits.

Then those treacherous Chinese, both the mainland communists and their feuding Taiwan-based cousins, had to go and ruin a good thing by going way beyond kissing and making up.

Even when they were verbally warring, they were still doing business together during this past decade. Trade between the two is already a hefty $110 billion, 41 percent of Taiwan's exports, but the new agreement will much expand that by ending tariffs on key products while opening up the financial services industry to investors from what was once an impenetrable cross-strait divide. Taiwanese business investment on the mainland is already massive, but now it will enter the realm of the mainland's high finance with the world economy as its playground.

The prospect of war between the two, already vastly diminished from Cold War highs, will soon not be possible without hitting their own investment assets on the other side. Which is exactly the peace of the new world order that some U.S. leaders, most prominently the first President Bush, had once welcomed. The question is whether Americans truly believe they can be winners in a world built on expanding trade rather than on military tension.

One has to wonder about our priorities when Congress cannot find the $34 billion needed to continue unemployment payments for six months to 1.7 million workers thrown out of jobs but never questions that sort of spending on military hardware with no logical purpose. The proud promise of American capitalism, often in conflict with a drearier reality, was that our economy did not need military conquest to succeed.

Now it is the Chinese, of varying ideological disposition, the heirs of Mao Zedong and Chiang Kai-shek, who will test our commitment to that principle. Clearly those former enemies have concluded that power, in the modern world economy, does not grow out of the barrel of a gun, even from a very big and enormously expensive one.

The China-Taiwan agreement and its implications also raise some questions for Americans: How does a modern nation obtain national security? Are we more secure with our permanent war economy, or is the pursuit of peace through trade and diplomacy, as the formerly most bitter of Chinese enemies are demonstrating, a better way?

Robert Scheer is editor of, where this column originally appeared. E-mail Robert Scheer at To find out more about Robert Scheer, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Webpage at



3 Comments | Post Comment
This is amazing news.

Thank god.

US has been encircling Russia and China from Eastern Europe to Japan and South Korea to Turkey to Middle East and Pakistan. I would have thought that once the encirclement was complete, the dreaded Third Word War would start.

But now, one piece of the circle is broken and US wouldn't be able to keep a hold on Iraq and Afghanistan to move against Russia. Thus is delayed a little further the dreadful war that we don't want to see.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Prateek Sanjay
Wed Jun 30, 2010 11:24 PM
Scheer, as usual on China and Taiwan, has everything backwards and upside down. Why he feels that he can skip research when he writes on this topic is a mystery to me..
First, what has happened is not "peace" and the trade agreement is, as Beijing's leaders constantly aver, the first step in annexing Taiwan to China. Scheer is cheerleading the annexation of vibrant democracy to an authoritarian state.
Second, the ECFA agreement between Taipei and Beijing is bitterly opposed in Taiwan by the pro-democracy, pro-Taiwan forces, and by the working class and small and medium-sized business owners who are getting the shaft. It is strongly supported by large businesses, the two ruling parties of China and Taiwan, and by international finance capital. A key official at a consulting firm in Taiwan owned by a former US senator told me in 2008, he had been lining up financial clients for two years in anticipation of this agreement.
In other words, Scheer has aligned himself with international finance capital and authoritarian power against democracy, workers, small businesses, and independence. Again, why he couldn't do twenty minutes research....
Why isn't this a peace agreement? 1 -- China has used its clout to restrict Taiwan's international status, forcing it to sell out its economic and political sovereignty to Beijing. 2 -- China threatens to invade the island, and currently points over 1,500 missiles at it. 3 -- the long term results, as China secures this phase of its long-term expansion along its borders, are likely to be a series of hegemonic wars. China claims territories which undisputably belong to its neighbors, and its annexations of Tibet and Taiwan have already led to further claims. What we have is a sell out, not peace. The probability of war everywhere along the frontier has just risen.
Great work Robert Scheer. Believe it or not, just because you are a progressive, doesn't mean you can skip the research.
BTW, as the Taipei Times confirmed today, the US has frozen weapons sales to Taiwan (the last delivery originated nearly a decade ago). The idea that the US is war profiteering on this conflict is written entirely in ignorance -- the US has consistently downplayed the China threat -- Adm Fallon forbade the US to conduct war games with China as the target when was running the Pacific Fleet -- and US corporations and defense and foreign policy specialists -- many of whom have lucrative consulting businesses with China -- are united in desiring that Taiwan be quietly sold out to China.
In sum, congratulations Robert: you've aligned yourself with an authoritarian government, international finance, the Pentagon, large corporations, and the local pro-China parties here in Taiwan. You couldn't be more wrong in your understanding.
Next time, do the research.
Michael Turton
The View from Taiwan
Comment: #2
Posted by: michaelturton
Wed Jun 30, 2010 11:59 PM
I just found this on Robert Scheers facebookpage
live Q&A to discuss his latest column, “The Chinese Aren't Coming.”

Join Truthdig Editor and columnist Robert Scheer on Thursday, July 1,
at 10 a.m. PST / 1 p.m. EST for a live Q&A to discuss his latest
column, “The Chinese Aren't Coming.” Submit your questions in advance using the link below, or send them during the live chat session.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Tony
Thu Jul 1, 2010 9:36 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Robert Scheer
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Star ParkerUpdated 10 Feb 2016
Walter Williams
Walter E. WilliamsUpdated 10 Feb 2016
Ben Shapiro
Ben ShapiroUpdated 10 Feb 2016

30 Apr 2008 No Country for Old Men

9 May 2007 Bush Alums Reap Their Reward

8 Jul 2014 Hillary Clinton Flaunts Her Surveillance State Baggage