creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Robert Scheer
Robert Scheer
14 May 2013
Elizabeth Warren, a Great Investment

Elizabeth Warren does great email. One payoff of my pittance of a contribution to her grass-roots funded … Read More.

7 May 2013
Obama Did It for the Money

The love fest between Barack Obama and his top fundraiser Penny Pritzker that has led to her being nominated … Read More.

30 Apr 2013
Google's Spymasters Are Now Worried About Your Secrets

A recent article in The Wall Street Journal by Google Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt, "The Dark Side of … Read More.

Soft on Crime: Protecting the 'Second Amendment Rights' of Thugs and Terrorists

Comment

Robert Scheer is not writing this week. The following is a column by Joe Conason.

What can Americans learn from the bitter debate over the gun reform bill?

Perhaps the most obvious lesson is that the leadership of the National Rifle Association, the Gun Owners of America and their tame Republican politicians have all earned an epithet of derision they used to hurl regularly at liberals.

Yes, the gun lobby and its legislative servants are "soft on crime" — although they routinely pretend to be tough on criminals.

During the Clinton presidency, NRA president-for-life Wayne LaPierre raised vast amounts of money with direct-mail campaigns against both Bill and Hillary Clinton for supposedly coddling criminals. Dubbed "Crimestrike," the NRA crusade pushed prison construction, mandatory minimum sentencing and sundry other panaceas designed to position the NRA as the bane of muggers, rapists and murderers. Those themes echoed traditional Republican propaganda messages dating back to the Nixon era, when the presidential crook himself often derided judicial concerns about civil liberties and promised to restore "law and order." (When Nixon henchmen like the late Chuck Colson went to prison themselves, they often emerged as prison reformers and civil libertarians, of course.)

But in the aftermath of the Newtown massacre, with the NRA angrily opposing any measure designed to hinder criminals from acquiring firearms, the public is learning who is really soft on crime.

Police officials across the country want universal background checks, magazine limits, and stronger enforcement against illegal weapons sales, but the NRA and its Republican allies insist that such changes will penalize legitimate gun owners.

Or they complain that criminals mainly obtain weapons by stealing them, so restrictions on sales won't make any difference.

Even a cursory examination of the facts demonstrates those claims are false. Gun trafficking experts at the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms have long known that less than 15 percent of all crime guns are stolen from their original owners. Much more common sources of guns used by criminals are so-called "straw purchases," where a person with a clean record buys a gun on behalf of a criminal, and corrupt purchases, where a licensed gun dealer knowingly sells to a criminal. Bipartisan gun legislation now before the Senate would crack down on these sales by increasing penalties for straw purchasers who willfully help criminals buy guns. The NRA has offered tepid support for that provision — but it is virtually meaningless without universal background checks, which the gun lobby opposes.

As Will Saletan pointed out in Slate last January, the NRA has consistently (and successfully) sought to kill the most basic efforts to keep guns away from convicted criminals and other dangerous characters — including abusive spouses under court protection orders, drug dealers and even individuals listed on the Justice Department's terrorist watch list.

In the wake of the Boston bombing, as the nation ponders how to bolster its security, the gun lobby's tender concern for the Second Amendment "rights" of terrorists and thugs ought to permanently discredit them and their political servants. Instead they have achieved another bloody victory in Washington.

To find out more about Joe Conason, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2013 CREATORS.COM



Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
A recent survey of police officers by "policeone.com", the largest survey ever conducted of police officers, found that police do NOT support gun control. To see the survey results, go to "policeone.com" and search for "survey". The site says that, "the survey found that the overall attitude of law enforcement is strongly anti-gun legislation and pro-gun rights, with the belief that an armed citizenry is effective in stopping crime." The bottom line is that the notion that the cops support gun control is a lie.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Christopher Bolton
Fri Apr 19, 2013 10:44 AM
I read your comments and found them to be quite interesting. I'm sure that is one perspective on the recent debate. I though the issue at hand was the safety of the children in schools, at least that is the way the conversation started. The Senate went off the rails when it changed the conversation from protecting the children to trying to regulate gun sales. Any change in the way guns sales are regulated would not affect the safety of children in schools.

As a life member of the NRA that is what I and many others had objection with. By converting the conversation the way it was changed, does nothing but show the hand of the people that want to have more gun control. According to gunpolicy.org, which references, Karp, Aaron. 2007. ‘Completing the Count: Civilian firearms - Annexe online.' Small Arms Survey 2007: Guns and the City; Chapter 2 (Annexe 4), p. 67 refers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 27 August, the rate of privately owned firearms in the U. S. is 88.8 per 100. With that kind of ratio, limiting gun sales in any way would be only a minor inconvenience for someone that really wants a gun. Only one or two of the mass shooting in the past ten years were with guns that were bought through a FFL. The rest were stolen.

If making a new or expanding a law would correct the problem then we could criminalize murder and it would stop the shootings at schools. As a member of the NRA, I believe the laws on the books need to be enforced. But according to our VP they don't have time to enforce those minor infractions of the law.

One thing stands above all other facts, criminals do not respect a law that gets in the way of what they want to do. With 3% of the counties in this country producing 75% of all firearm homicides, it is not a gun problem, it is a personal value problem.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Jeffery Howard
Fri Apr 19, 2013 11:01 AM
Gun control is not one of the enumerated powers granted to the federal government by The Constitution. The Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms is an unalienable right that is not subject for debate. Our elected federal public servants who took an Oath to preserve, protect and defend that Constitution are attempting to undermine the supreme law of our Republic. Joe's unalienable right to freedom of speech is also an unalienable right. Too bad he doesn't use that right to tell the truth. Get a grip, Joey-boy
Comment: #3
Posted by: David Henricks
Sat Apr 20, 2013 5:10 AM
Actually, the 2nd amendment uses the words "well regulated" militia, I believe. Sounds like government to me. There can be a natural rights argument for weapons rights, but unlimited gun ownwrship is not guaranteed by the constitutional argument. And Supreme court opinions can and have changed on this, and have flouted precedent as well.
Comment: #4
Posted by: John Craig
Thu May 9, 2013 8:09 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Robert Scheer
May. `13
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Joseph Farah
Joseph FarahUpdated 15 May 2013
Walter Williams
Walter E. WilliamsUpdated 15 May 2013
Patrick Buchanan
Pat BuchananUpdated 14 May 2013

13 Apr 2011 The False Debate on Debt

7 May 2013 Obama Did It for the Money

22 Oct 2008 The Battle for Obama's Economic Soul