creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Robert Scheer
Robert Scheer
25 May 2012
Do the Bain Hustle

Obviously, Barack Obama was right in criticizing Mitt Romney's stewardship of Bain Capital. How else to … Read More.

18 May 2012
Obama Can't Knock the Hustle

How did we end up with such smart scoundrels? Even after it was known that Jamie Dimon's bank blew more than $… Read More.

11 May 2012
Hope and Hesitation in Obama's Sudden Conversion

Once again, President Barack Obama has come tantalizingly close to being terrific. But his failure of courage … Read More.

Bill Clinton's Legacy of Denial

Share Comment

Does Bill Clinton still not grasp that the current economic crisis is in large measure his legacy? Obviously that's the case, or he wouldn't have had the temerity to write a 14-point memo for Newsweek on how to fix the economy that never once refers to the home mortgage collapse and other manifestations of Wall Street greed that he enabled as president.

Endorsing the Republican agenda of financial industry deregulation, reversing New Deal safeguards, President Clinton pursued policies that in the long run created more damage to the American economy than any other president since Herbert Hoover, whose presidential tenure is linked to the Great Depression.

Now, in his Newsweek piece, Clinton has the effrontery to once again revive his 1992 campaign mantra, "It's the economy, stupid," as the article's title without any sense of irony, let alone accountability. But that has always been the man's special gift — to rise above, and indeed benefit from, the messes he created.

His list of safe nostrums — painting tar-surface roofs white and seeking more efficient solar and battery production — to be featured at his lavishly funded Clinton Global Initiative conference in Chicago next week is vintage Clinton hype. All of those solutions are of the win-win sort that he loved to ballyhoo as president. Who in his or her right mind would be against green job creation? But that hardly speaks to a crisis in which, as was reported Tuesday, the housing meltdown continues unabated, as the toxic mortgages sold and packaged by the leading banks and investment houses clog the real estate market, destroying consumer confidence and hobbling job creation.

Conceding that the bailed-out banks are sitting on $2 trillion that they won't lend, Clinton offers not a word about mortgage relief for swindled homeowners. With an all-time high of 44 million Americans living below the poverty line, Clinton once again brags of his success in ending the federal welfare program.

There is only a one-sentence reference in the Clinton article to the era of financial greed: "The real thing that has killed us in the last 10 years is that too much of our dealmaking creativity has been devoted to expanding the financial sector in ways that don't create new businesses and more jobs and to persuading people to take on excessive debt loads to make up for the fact that their incomes are stagnant."

Now that's a clear description of the consequence of President Clinton's policy of radical deregulation of the financial industry, but he writes as if that outcome has nothing to do with him.

Clinton signed off on the reversal of the Glass-Steagall Act, the legislative jewel of the Franklin Roosevelt administration designed to prevent financial institutions from getting too big to fail. In signing the Financial Services Modernization Act, which broke down the barrier between high-rolling Wall Street investment firms and consumer banks carrying the deposits of ordinary folk, Clinton gushed in 1999, "Over the (past) seven years, we have tried to modernize the economy. ... And today what we are doing is modernizing the financial services industry, tearing down those antiquated laws and granting banks significant new authority."

The first beneficiary of that legislation was Citigroup, a corporation that resulted from a merger that would have been banned by Glass-Steagall. Upon signing the law, Clinton handed one of the pens he used to a beaming Sandy Weill, Citigroup CEO and a close friend and financial supporter of the president. Clinton's treasury secretary, Robert Rubin, then went off to be a $15-million-a-year exec at Citigroup and was in a key position there when the bank made those toxic derivative packages that would have forced it into bankruptcy had U.S. taxpayers not bailed the bank out.

So much for the "modernizing" that Clinton had bragged about.

A year later, a variation of that same word appeared in the title of the Commodity Futures Modernization Act, which Clinton signed and which exempted from government regulation all of the collateralized debt obligations and credit default swaps that would later prove so toxic. That legislation led to the explosion of the market in unregulated mortgage-based securities, the key source of the financial-sector "dealmaking" that Clinton now bemoans.

In his memoir, Clinton pays tribute to Rubin as "the best and most important treasury secretary since Alexander Hamilton." He wrote that line in 2004, when Rubin, who had come to Clinton from a top job at Goldman Sachs and later left for Citigroup, was already clearly defined as someone who profited mightily from the very bills that he had pushed through while working for Clinton.

As with so much in the Clinton record, the former president remains in deep denial over having any culpability for his misdeeds. In his thousand-page memoir there is no reference to the above-mentioned radical deregulation of the economy that he presided over. As evidenced by his Newsweek article, the man has long been convinced that there is no problem or contradiction of his that cannot be simply plastered over with blather. Sadly, he may be right.

Robert Scheer is editor of truthdig.com, where this column originally appeared. E-mail Robert Scheer at rscheer@truthdig.com. To find out more about Robert Scheer, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Webpage at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM


Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
What a great article. Every word is true and written so concisely, that after reading it, a person understands and must admit that what Mr. Scheer writes, is true.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Mandy
Wed Jun 22, 2011 3:18 PM
Clinton (the first candidate I voted for who actually won) disappointed me in many ways, but I wasn't even aware of this stuff at the time. I've often wondered how weak or corrupt the Democrats had to be to allow such a thorough dismantling of the protections enacted after 1932; didn't realize how much of that came from the top in the '90s.

Does it even matter who I vote for? Nobody will stand up to the banks; nobody will really fight for universal health care; nobody will even discuss the idea of ending the ludicrous, ruinous War on Drugs; and nobody in government seems to think it's creepy to refer to the United States as "the Homeland". It really feels like, for the past 30 years, the White House has been alternately occupied by Republicans ... and slightly moderate Republicans.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Steven Doyle
Thu Jun 23, 2011 5:40 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Robert Scheer
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

24 Jun 2009 In Financial Crisis, Obama Is More of the Same

6 Dec 2007 It Turns Out Ahmadinejad Was the Truthful One

27 Jun 2007 Profiting at Taxpayer Expense