opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Robert Scheer
Robert Scheer
5 Feb 2016
Crisis of Faith and Football

As a recently suffering Oakland Raiders fan, I greeted the death of Kenny "The Snake" Stabler with a cocktail … Read More.

26 Oct 2015
An Idiotic GOP Is Looking at the Wrong Thing in Its Clinton Probe

The Republicans on that committee investigating Hillary Clinton are idiots for focusing on decisions about … Read More.

19 Oct 2015
Bernie Blew It: He Sold Out Instead of Confronting Clinton

Bernie blew it. By embracing rather than confronting Hillary Clinton, Sen. Sanders fell into the trap of … Read More.

A Campaign Driven by Fear


Barack Obama is betraying his promise of change and is in danger of becoming just another political hack.

Yes, just like former maverick John McCain, who has refashioned himself as a mindless rubber stamp for the most inane policies of the miserably failed Bush administration. Both candidates are embracing, rather than challenging, the fundamental irrationality of Bush's "war on terror," which substitutes hysteria for rational analysis in appraising the dangers the country faces.

Terrorism is a social pathology that needs to be excised with the surgical precision of detective work, inspired by a high level of international cooperation, the very opposite of the unilateral war metaphor that recruits new generations of terrorists in the wake of the massive armies we dispatch. At a time when we desperately need a president to remind us we have nothing to fear but fear itself, we are increasingly being treated to a presidential campaign driven by fear.

Both candidates supported the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which has everything to do with violating the basic freedoms of our citizens and nothing to do with making them safer. There was no shortage of alarming intelligence warning the Bush administration of the impending 9-11 attacks, but rather an utter lack of competency in evaluating the abundance of evidence.

To use the failure of the president to pay attention to his daily briefing warning of an impending attack as an excuse for shredding the fundamental rights of our citizens is appallingly illogical. Providing legal protection to the government and the telecommunications giants for unfettered spying on the people does not represent the change we desperately need.

Nor does the battle of the warmongers that has dominated the discussion of foreign policy in the past week. Obama has one-upped McCain's bluff to win in Iraq by raising the prospect of an even more deadly quagmire in Afghanistan. If his goal was to remind us that Democrats have been more often the party of irrational wars than the Republicans, he has succeeded all too well.

Whereas Dwight Eisenhower refused to wage war against Vietnam and Cuba, it was John Kennedy, that charmer of change, who launched both of those military disasters. And then there was that crafty "progressive" Lyndon Baines Johnson, who in order to defeat Barry Goldwater, the right-wing menace of his day, lied about a nonexistent attack in the Gulf of Tonkin to justify escalating a war that killed almost 59,000 Americans and 3.4 million Indochinese.

Even less noticed is the responsibility of Democrats for the mess in Afghanistan, which provided the incubator for the 9-11 attacks.

It was under Jimmy Carter, highly admired as an ex-president, that the specter of modern Islamic fanaticism erupted, largely as a monster of our own creation when we supported Muslim fanatics in Afghanistan against the Soviets.

Carter's national security adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski, asked in a January 1998 interview with the French magazine Nouvelle Observatour whether he regretted "having given arms and advice to future terrorists," replied: "What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Muslims or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the Cold War?"

I was reminded of that horrid stain on the record of Democratic stewardship of our foreign policy while cleaning out my garage last week. I came across a 1996 press release from the publisher of "From the Shadows — The Ultimate Insider's Story of Five Presidents and How They Won the Cold War," written by current Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, the ultimate insider who was on Carter's National Security Council staff. The publisher's book promo boasts that thanks to Gates, who ran the CIA for many years, we learn of "Carter's never-before-revealed covert support to Afghan mujahedeen — six months before the Soviets invaded."

In short, the Democratic president baldly lied to us when he justified support for the Muslim fanatics in Afghanistan who were battling the secular government in Kabul as a necessary Cold War response to a Soviet invasion. That Gates' account is accurate was affirmed in a blurb for the book by none other than Brzezinski, hailing it as "a most impressive achievement ... especially pertaining to the U.S. policy on Afghanistan."

It is hardly reassuring that Brzezinski has resurfaced in presidential politics, this time as an occasional adviser to Barack Obama, or that there is talk that Obama, in a burst of bipartisan enthusiasm, might ask Gates to stay on as defense secretary.

At this point, I throw up my hands and plead with the candidate who I hoped would be that much-needed agent of change: Please prove me wrong.

Robert Scheer's new book is "The Pornography of Power: How Defense Hawks Hijacked 9/11 and Weakened America." E-mail Robert Scheer at To find out more about Robert Scheer, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Webpage at



2 Comments | Post Comment
Is it possible McCain and Obama have discovered they do not have any viable solutions of their own; therefore have no choice but to wallow in the muck left behind from the Bush presidency?
Comment: #1
Posted by: liz
Thu Jul 24, 2008 11:02 AM
This country's obsession with the military as being the solution to all our foreign policy problems is what will eventually lead to our downfall. Our nation is facing the very real threat of economic meltdown with gigantic and ever growing budget and trade deficits, unregulated financial shenanigans in Wall Street aided and abetted by their pimps in D.C., a weakening dollar and total reliance on foreign capital to keep it all going and yet the question continually posed is who will make the better commander in chief? In any nation ruled by common sense, the question of war and planning for it should be a matter well down on the list of priorities, but in this nation, which spends more on it's military than the rest of the world combined, it's all important. Any reasonable review of this nation's condition would reveal that the subject of that much dreaded 3:00a.m. phone call will be of an economic and not military related matter. As someone who volunteered for the draft during Vietnam and went Airborne because that was the sure way to get sent to the war, I am both saddened and bemused that the American public's fascination about an entity, the military, and an experience, the slaughter of combat, they know nothing about and so assiduously have avoided, is such a large part of their decision on who should lead this country. War is a for profit racket started by those who will profit from it, who will not fight in it and is waged by those who have been expertly manipulated using their fears and prejudices and will get absolutely no personal gain from it. Just ask yourself, why is it the powers that be wave the flag when it's time for war but when it comes to making$$$ they'll send your job out of the country at the drop of a hat simply because they'll make a bigger profit? Just how does outsourcing American jobs fit into that cheery slogan, "United We Stand"? After all, the pace of outsourcing has only accelearated since 9-11 and yet people follow sheep like the leaders who so look down on them.
Comment: #2
Posted by: michael nola
Fri Jul 25, 2008 4:50 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Robert Scheer
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 13 Feb 2016
David Harsanyi
David HarsanyiUpdated 12 Feb 2016
David Limbaugh
David LimbaughUpdated 12 Feb 2016

18 Nov 2009 Where Is the Community Organizer We Elected President?

25 Mar 2009 Obama's Toxic Advisers

3 Oct 2014 Open Letter on Censorship