WASHINGTON — Though I cannot recall ever endorsing a presidential candidate I am going to do so in this column. In this, I am following the lead of the dean of conservative columnists, the excellent Charles Krauthammer. Last week he endorsed Sen. John McCain. Count me for McCain, too.
Our country is at war with terrorists. It faces a grave financial crisis. On both issues McCain is infinitely more experienced than his opponent, Sen. Barack Obama. Perhaps it is because McCain is a retired naval officer and a gentleman, but he remains disappointingly reticent about his personal achievements. Sure, he modestly declares that throughout his adult life he has never flinched from answering his country's call, but there is much more to his life's accomplishment than that. I wish he had allowed his campaign to air more of the videos showing him in that cruel North Vietnamese prison. And there is also footage of his leaping out of a burning fighter on the deck of an aircraft carrier, the back of his flight suit aflame. People who have seen these videos have understood that McCain's commitment to duty is more substantial than the inflated claims of the average campaigning pol.
McCain might have made more of the fact that he rebuilt his broken body after being tortured in prison, defied the pessimistic medical prognostications, and flew combat aircraft again. Then he took command of the Navy's largest air squadron, which he revived to flight readiness. That is an act of executive prowess no one else in this presidential race can claim. Next, he became naval liaison to the Senate and helped rebuild the American military by working with senators on both sides of the aisle. As a congressman and a senator, he has continued this sort of bipartisan reform. Some of the reforms I have opposed, but no other candidate in this race has his record of constructive legislation and leadership.
In the area of national security, he has demonstrated that he knows things that Obama, a novice with but four years on the national stage, can only imagine. McCain knew the surge in Iraq would work, and he had the grit to support it when few would. Once again he was putting his country before his own political ambitions. Nonetheless, McCain is no soft touch for the military. Over the years he has demanded efficiency and economy at the Pentagon and throughout the federal budget. Now in a time of financial crisis he has opted for a proven strategy for economic recovery: low taxes, free trade, and budgetary prudence. Obama's alternatives are the proven recipe for protracted recession. On health care McCain's policies promise expanded coverage with costs under control. Obama's alternative promises the efficiencies of the Post Office, with the citizenry standing in long lines and costs spiraling ever upwards.
McCain then is a true American hero, probably the most heroic to come this close to the presidency.
He is a seasoned political leader. He is the model for good citizenship.
Alternatively, there is Obama's record. People who have worked with him tell me he is a decent man. Yet, all he has ever done is run for office, though he has only held two: a seat in the Illinois senate and the U.S. Senate seat he won in 2004. Though he is new to politics, his policies are not as new as he boasts. They are a rerun of the failed Great Society with some latter-day left-wing extravagances thrown in.
That he has not been honest about this is disturbing, and he has established a pattern of deceit in this election that is still more disturbing. His claim that he offers a tax cut for "95 percent" of the citizenry is an obvious deceit. So far as I can ascertain it means sending government checks to some 40 percent of the citizenry who pay no taxes and raising taxes on the rest of us — yes, tax increases in the midst of recession! More disturbing is that Obama has not been honest about the radical figures he has associated with. William Ayers is an unrepentant left-wing radical who actually bombed government facilities and caused the injury and death of fellow Americans. That is a cold fact. Obama's association with the Rev. Jeremiah Wright and Father Michael Pfleger put him in company with angry anti-American fringe figures, who, were they on the far right, would have ended Obama's political career long ago. Again, he has not been honest about these associations, and McCain — officer and gentleman that he is — has not held Obama to account.
Now we hear that there is at least audio of a 2003 dinner held for Palestinian activist Rashid Khalidi (a spokesman for the Palestinian Liberation Organization when it was recognized by Washington as a terrorist organization) with Obama in attendance. Reportedly the Illinois state senator was praising Khalidi. Though the audio is being withheld by the Los Angeles Times, Americans ought to hear it before the election. At this dinner speakers allegedly denounced the United States and Israel. By 2003, Khalidi was a neighbor and friend of Obama at the University of Chicago. Again Obama has been deceptive about this dinner and his relationship with this former spokesman for Yasir Arafat.
I actually know a good bit about people such as Ayers, Pfleger, Wright, and now Khalidi. They are the kind of anti-Americans who thrive on the outer fringes of the left. Whether they really hate America as they boast or are just attitudinizing, I do not know. But the consequence of their behavior has endangered this country. By 2003, Obama, green as he is, should have known this. More to the point, he should have been forthright when these friendships were revealed.
At best an Obama presidency would be a return to the Carter years. At worst it would place this country in a condition of peril that we have never experienced in modern times. McCain will protect the country and put it on the road to recovery. He has protected America all his adult life and deserves another tour of service.
R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr. is founder and editor-in-chief of The American Spectator and an adjunct scholar at the Hudson Institute. To find out more about R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr. and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.

|
 |
Comments
|
3 Comments | Post Comment
|
|
Sir;.... The war with terror as it is presented to us is a small thing, and a contrived war of choice... The war against capital; the insidious war against the destruction liberty by wealth is life long and never ending.... The war against ignorance, the tendency of people under stress to withdraw into magic and religion, and to submit their rational discretion to the influence of earthly authority acting for religion -is limiting to human progress; and it results in terror... People in every generation, if they will be free, and have freedom to hand to their children, must throw off the authority vested in simple humans beings acting in the name of God and fate and faith; and take matters into their own hands and decide for themselves what is moral in light of what is healthy.... This country began with a relegation of religion to the outside of government, and those people so little versed in science and reason managed better to do what is right than we do today... If it is normal for people hard pressed to burrow into the folds of religion and to hide between the pages of the Bible, it is all the more certain that government should deliver justice to people in their society and in their economy... The failure of government is the success of religion... The weakness of government is the strength of religion, and with religion comes murder, violence and terror for an ungodly -godly cause.... The danger of terror is real... The cause of terror is not beyond our control, and it does not wait on some foreign shore, or come in with the tide... Terror begets terror... Faith breeds fear... Faith answers fear with fear... If you say terrorism is the reason to vote for Mr. Mccain; my answer is that organized religion everywhere is terror, and has always ruled with terror and rules still in every small town in America with terror... A vote for Mr. Mccain is a vote for terror... It is a vote for more of the condition that brings forth terror because what he represents, what those who support him represent -is a reliance of government upon faith instead of science, and a rejection of reason in the conduct of our affairs... Look at your country, man.... Was the South of Slavery, and the South of the Klan NOT hand in glove with organized religion??? Even Stonewall Jackson suffered attack for teaching slaves to read the bible... Religion was not for them; but against them. It was not for their freedom, but against their freedom, and when Jackson had to choose a society he chose one that denied to slave human beings both their access to God and to their liberty. But was it not the truth, that each side had its religous justification for burning this country up in Civil War???.. We are a house divided, and the hate inspired and given voice by religion mocks the suffering of billions around the world on a cross of capital. Religion is going to run this country or destroy it. . Religion justifies your war and your terror... I do not vote for an agent of that destruction... I vote for liberty, justice, equality, and democracy...Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Thu Oct 30, 2008 8:43 AM
|
|
|
|
The best reason to vote for McCain: He isn't 0bama.
And as for Mr. Sweeney, apparently when he was baptized, they held him underwater a bit too long, accounting for his phobia against religion.
As for slavery, it was the religious convictions of the abolitionists that drove them to fight against the institution of slavery. No one is forcing you to be religious (not in this country, anyway, although I can't say this about the home countries of the people you don't believe to be terrorists), but don't try to force people NOT to be religious, either.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Nick_in_Virginia
Thu Oct 30, 2008 9:09 AM
|
|
|
|
Nick in Virginian; Sir;... You are not disagreeing with me to say the abolitionist fought on religious grounds... Who can say that violence was not necessary, but it should not have been justified by the preaching of Christ... But Christians and christianity are very flexible on the issue of violence, and as the Crusades shows, they could absolve people of sins in advance of their crimes if it suited them... Islam is a martial religion... Violence is an accepted tenent of their religion. To accept struggle and if need be, violence is hot hypocritical for them as it is for us... So; why can't we leave them to be in their own land??? Well; we happen to want their property at the price we are willing to pay... How dare they resist us... Even Mr. Obama is wrong to say we should charge them for their rebuilding and for the military presence out of their own oil revenue... Really; Come and break my house and camp on my front lawn, and send me a bill for the damage you do, and see how I take it... We have little in common with the Muslims... They are more like the Society of Jesus, or the Dominicans in that they all take their religion very seriously... We don't... Not only do we beat up on the people of God, Islam, but we persist in trying to pervert their religion by broadcasting immoral sexual trash into their western t.v.s; and we challenge them with our own behavior, which puts every material good between us and our God... I'll be the first to admit I am a lousy Christian, but if the issue were slavery, or Islam, I hope to tell you I would not have to be a Christian to act as a Christian and prize a live enemy more than a dead friend... I don't care for the religious right, and the way they use rights like the freedom of speech to attack all rights, and all the time evade taxes while pushing a political agenda... And I would not trust my life with them, nor yours... They do not seem to grasp reality, that violence is wrong, that inciting to violence is wrong, even against Islam; but, that worst of all, is their perversion of our democracy, which is our only method of resolving differences -short of violence... I think they want to hijack the political process in order to hurry their enemies to their judgement; and I want to see it used to communicate, that is, to tell the truth to the people so the people can decide.... That free dicision, is something religions forbid there members, and want to deny to the nation, and even to the world... I'm religious... I study the Bible, and all matter on religion...The immorality I eschew, I eschew freely... But religion is only a form of relationship... Just like the nation is a relationship, and humanity is a relationship... And it is a lousy relationship when one side dictates to the other, or threatens violence, or stuffs up everyones mouth with nonsense... So, let me apologize in advance of any pain you might suffer from my words... We all have to learn to talk... We have to quit turning the government to crap in the process of trying to capture it, and use it against our fellows... And we have got to quit using our religion to justify injustice... Let us all keep our enemies alive, and bore them to death, if killing them with kindness is out of the question... Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #3
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Thu Oct 30, 2008 6:25 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|