opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
R. Emmett Tyrrell
R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr.
4 Feb 2016
The Clinton Curse Returns

WASHINGTON — In the many decades I have had the pleasure of covering the Clintons, I have developed … Read More.

28 Jan 2016
A Manifesto of My Own

WASHINGTON — In reading Paul Johnson's masterful "Art: A New History," I came across a startling number … Read More.

21 Jan 2016
Hillary's Past Meets the Present

WASHINGTON — Did any of the political cognoscenti consult Real Clear Politics last Thursday? Those who … Read More.

Romney Is Coming On Strong


WASHINGTON — There are some campaign advisers who would counsel former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney to jog on the campaign trail tirelessly, probably in short pants and with a catchy T-shirt emblazoned with some memorable phrase, say, "Fred Fna Ate Here," a la Al Gore and Bill Clinton. Jimmy Carter started the presidential candidates' jogging craze, and since him there have been a horde of presidential joggers, all wearing little boys' outfits, the notable exception being Ronald Reagan — possibly because, as he campaigned from 1976 on, he was considered too old to be president. On the other hand, the old cowboy had a sense of dignity that all other would-be presidents in recent years have lacked. Perhaps Romney should be photographed windsurfing as John Kerry was in 2004 and downing shots of firewater as Hillary Clinton did in 2008. Or he could filch a page from President-elect Vladimir Putin and campaign shirtless. Adopt the he-man look, Mitt!

Alas, Romney is a normal middle-aged American. He is the kind of man we all would like to have live next door. Facts are facts; all the aforesaid candidates save Reagan and now Romney are weird! Americans do not mind having them wearing funny hats and eating ethnic food on the campaign trail, but almost no American would want them as neighbors. Not so Romney. He would be welcome in our neighborhoods and maybe even trusted with a key to the house. Romney is NORMAL.

That is one fundamental reason, as this campaign season draws to an end, I am glad he will get the nomination. Think about it. Practically everyone who has run for the presidency over the past few decades has been odd. You would not want any of them in your neighborhood. Why would you want one of them in the White House? Rick Santorum ran a fine, if improbable, race, emphasizing values many of us share. Dr. Ron Paul reminded us of our constitutional principles that set Americans apart from the citizenry of other nations. Yet Newt Gingrich was the standard-issue candidate of recent decades. He was as bizarre as Bill Clinton but lacks Bill's charm — if that is the word for it.

Romney is normal.

That is what those in the press corps really mean when they say things like he fails to inspire or he commits gaffes. Compared with whom, with Joe Biden? The other day, Joe addressed the perfectly nice female president of Scott Community College, Dr. Theresa Paper, as "Dr. Pepper." Joe's list of gaffes is encyclopedic. Moreover, Romney is campaigning for things most Americans believe in and, in fact, many consider exigent.

He would repeal Obamacare and give Medicaid block grants to the state. It costs less for Medicaid in Idaho than in New York City. He says he would take seriously an alternative health care proposal involving "premium support," after the health care proposal of Rep. Paul Ryan. He has promised to cut taxes — a 20 percent across-the-board cut in marginal rates, an elimination of the death tax, an elimination of taxes on capital gains, interest and qualified dividends for those with an adjusted gross income of $200,000 or less, plus a cut of the corporate tax rate to 25 percent. What is more, he would repeal Dodd-Frank, amend Sarbanes-Oxley and initiate a review of all of President Barack Obama's nanny state regulations. That ought to get the economy revved up!

In foreign policy, he has promised in his first 100 days to reverse Obama's cuts in missile defense, modernize our Navy and reverse the decline in the aging inventories of the Air Force, Army and Marines. He would pressure Iran to stop building nuclear weapons and improve our relations in the Middle East, starting with Israel. He has promised to open America's energy reserves for development and prevent the overregulation of shale gas and extraction, helping to make America energy-independent. He has promised to amend the Clean Air Act, excluding carbon dioxide from its jurisdiction. Those are policies that all conservatives can applaud and independents, too.

So why is there any doubt that Romney is a conservative? He already has won broad segments of the conservative vote and the tea party movement. Soon he will win over large numbers of independents. America is facing a crisis in spending and overreach. I think Romney could meet the crisis and restore America to happy days.

R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr. is founder and editor-in-chief of The American Spectator and an adjunct scholar at the Hudson Institute. He is the author of the forthcoming book "The Death of Liberalism." To find out more about R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr. and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at



4 Comments | Post Comment
Romney will "Take seriously" an alternative health care plan? Amend Sarbanes Oxley, an Act designed to protect us against corporate abuses, fraudulent accounting practices and misleading financial reports.He wants to end that? Anyone remember Enron, WorldCom and Arthur Anderson? These corporate "giants" caused millions upon millions of dollars in losses to so many of us. Corrupt and dissolute every one of them their greed led to America's economic collapse.
Repeal the Dodd Frank act? Again leave the consumer without protection?
Absolutely. Romney will do this and more because it is his peers and colleagues who own and run these monstrous thieving entities.
I relish the day these posers finally remove their masks of humility and humanity and drop their politically correct lies of concern and pseudo understanding of poverty in America and the faltering middle class. Their phoney concerns about loss of public trust make a person with a strong stomach, gag.
Please, please allow Romney or any Republican to be elected. Allow him to repeal Dodd Frank, amend Sarbanes Oxley, drop all pretense of public concern and expose themselves and their naked greed to their misguided supporters who will soon find their credo of wealth at any cost is ok until you're the one paying the cost. Maybe then the people will be galvanized into action to take their country out of the hands of the wealthy and back into the hands of the people.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Steve
Wed Apr 4, 2012 7:27 PM
Re: Steve
I have 200 employes maybe I should just give them the company and go home
Comment: #2
Posted by: Joe
Sun Apr 8, 2012 11:01 AM
Joe, why you directed such an ambiguous statement to me is puzzling.
My initial response is that without 200 employees you wouldn't have a company to give to anyone.
If your 200 employees didn't have a job with you, they'd have no wages to spend with other companies and pay no taxes to support our government. The companies which sell the products needed by your 200 will lose money because they just lost 200 customer/consumers. Without the money of the 200, those companies can no longer pay back some debt they may owe to your company which is no longer in business because you no longer employ 200.
"Employees" are consumers and the lifeblood of any business and stand equal with "Employers" on the food chain. It is arguably a synergistic relationship, we are interdependent. Joe, if my business requires more than my own two hands, I'm dependent on the next two pair of hands I hire. An exchange of services, their two hands for my 200$. As inflation increases, they will necessarily raise the price for their two pair of hands. Remembering that inflation has also increased my bottom line from the red to the black, I pay what they ask. If inflation has reduced my bottom line from the black into the red a recourse is stock options or a piece of the company till things improve.
I'm sure I've missed the meaning of your comment and it may elicit a better response from others who have more interest.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Steve
Sun Apr 8, 2012 3:43 PM

I do not understand either you or Joe. The employees are just selling a product like the employer and that product is a service or skill set. Therefore the employer is a customer of the employee also. Why should the federal government have anything to do with who is a customer from who and of what? I think this concept is call capitalism. If this is true would things that interfere with this symbiotic relationship be the oppostie - socialism?
Comment: #4
Posted by: SCOTT
Fri Apr 27, 2012 5:21 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr.
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
David Harsanyi
David HarsanyiUpdated 12 Feb 2016
Suzanne Fields
Suzanne FieldsUpdated 12 Feb 2016
Patrick Buchanan
Pat BuchananUpdated 12 Feb 2016

28 May 2014 Death On Campus

9 Jul 2014 What the Obituarists Never Said About Dick Scaife

25 Aug 2010 The Future for a Radical