creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
R. Emmett Tyrrell
R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr.
15 Feb 2012
It's Time for Newt to Go!

WASHINGTON — There is a grisly pallor that has beset former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich. Then, too,… Read More.

9 Feb 2012
The Delousing of a Movement

WASHINGTON — As the tents were coming down at McPherson Square, the dead rats and mice being retrieved, … Read More.

2 Feb 2012
Exit Newt

WASHINGTON — Ah, yes, Newt Gingrich did in the last days of the Florida primary precisely what I … Read More.

Capitol Hill's New Role of Tax Collector

Share Comment

WASHINGTON — It has happened again! Another Obama nominee has admitted to tax problems. Health and Human Services nominee Kathleen Sebelius has admitted to irregularities in her tax returns extending over the past three years. She has made good by sending off a check for $7,000. Sebelius claims that problems were discovered by her accountant as she prepared for her confirmation hearings and that the debt was the consequence of "unintentional errors." Incidentally, when she was committing those errors, she was governor of Kansas.

According to my calculations, that makes five Obama nominees who have reported similar tax irregularities, none of which was discovered until the nominees began making preparations for their confirmation hearings. Others who have benefited the U.S. Treasury by submitting to confirmation hearings include former New York Fed President Timothy Geithner and former Dallas Mayor Ron Kirk. Geithner discovered that he owed the government $34,000 and paid promptly. He is now secretary of treasury. Kirk discovered that he owed nearly $10,000 and presumably also paid promptly, for on March 18, he was confirmed as U.S. trade representative.

Two other Obama administration nominees withdrew from consideration when their tax problems were discovered. They are Nancy Killefer — who was nominated to be chief performance officer, or White House performance czar, before it was discovered that there was a $946 lien on her house for her failure to pay unemployment compensation tax on household help — and, of course, former Senate Democratic leader Tom Daschle, who withdrew his nomination to head Health and Human Services after it was discovered that he owed $140,000 in taxes and interest. Daschle also became a millionaire while serving as one of Washington's hated lobbyists. The Obama administration is highly critical of lobbyists and also of millionaires.

All of this suggests that the Internal Revenue Service may have hit on a novel way to get tax cheats to pay up: nominate them to high government service.

Given President Barack Obama's pledge to reform government, it is somewhat surprising to read of all these tax cheats among his nominees.

On the other hand, the fact that so many high-level Democrats fail to pay their taxes might explain why they are such staunch advocates of raising taxes. They themselves do not pay them until they face confirmation hearings. Not that tax irregularities were the only problem faced by an Obama nominee. There was the former Democratic presidential candidate who decided to withdraw his nomination for secretary of commerce when someone told him that his pending grand jury investigation might not look good during his confirmation hearings. That would be Bill Richardson, who is the governor of New Mexico and was ambassador to the United Nations during the Clinton administration. You might recall that during the Clinton High Jinks, Ambassador Richardson served as headhunter (if that is the right term) for the curvaceous Monica Lewinsky when the heat was on.

Ethics may yet become an issue with the Obama administration, which, like the Clinton administration, came to Washington promising an administration of unparalleled ethical purity. The $410 billion omnibus spending bill is a cornucopia for graft. The $787 billion stimulus bill is yet another cornucopia for graft. Then there is the problem recently editorialized upon by The Wall Street Journal.

It appears that the Treasury Department's plan for toxic-asset purchases is going to be limited to a handful of huge companies bidding on the toxic assets and managing them. The Journal was too polite to bring up the term "crony capitalism," but it did speak of the possibility that these few firms will reap huge profits in a toxic-asset purchase plan that might be of only limited effect. "We have no idea if Treasury is playing favorites," the Journal editorialized, "but it certainly doesn't look good. All the more so given that some of these big players may have consulted informally with the Obama Administration as it was writing the plan."

What might be done to vet this plan? Perhaps it could be sent up to Capitol Hill for a confirmation hearing. We have already seen the Hill's hygienic effect on Obama nominees.

R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr. is the founder and editor-in-chief of The American Spectator and an adjunct scholar at the Hudson Institute. To find out more about R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr. and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
why don't you investigate madame fee fee hillary clinton the fbi file scandle why do you think republicans were saying wonderful things about that witch that is how the bonnie and clyde of politics play and everyone should know that this woman is so unfit for any job she has played victim all of her life she owes monica a thankyou for all the gigs she gets just by playing a victim
Comment: #1
Posted by: susan bisceglia
Thu Apr 2, 2009 3:34 AM
Taxpayers feel the politicians are more criminal than the ones in prisons, put there by the same people "
WHO DON'T PAY TAXES AND DON'T FEEL THEY HAVE TO!" After all, aren't they all 'stealing' your childrens and grandchildrens future, with no end in site?

Folks, the Change, Taxpayers expected, that have a job at present, 'ain't
gonna happen' unless you let the politicians know you're fed up with their
deceit and greed! Taxpayers, of all races, just thought they were fed up
with the Bush Administration! Obama convinced voters he was the man for
President, so in next few months, let's see how he handles economy and stops
doing radical things that's costing trillions!" Americas' debt would have
been drastically reduced from Obamas' two years of campaigning!

Promising to redistribute wealth isn't the answer! Raising taxes on highest
income earners who are private business owners won't create jobs! During
these depressed times, this will accomplish the socialists' goals. Socialist
and Radical changes will haunt America forever!

Taxpayers, of all races, should have put an end to 'social and welfare
programs', numerous committees and boards. The following shows how socialist
and radical programs took place.

1977 - Community Reinvestment Act. Carter admininstration. The Democratic
Congress intimidated banks into making sub-prime loans to high-risk buyers.
People living off social and welfare programs shouldn't have been pushed
into buying the American dream without working for it.

2000-2008 - Frank, Meeks, Waters, Dodd, Reid, Clinton, Pelosi, (naming a
few) stating "We don't have a crisis. Nothings' wrong with Freddie/Fannie!"
They continue to cover mess up! Raines, Howard, and Johnson were some of
their buddies that walked away with 20-90 million dollar parachutes! Was
this a windfall or what?


2009 - Politicians want infrastructures, new visions. They've admitted these
are temporary solutions. Without manufacturing jobs, we don't need
infrastructures? These manufacturing jobs helped people pay taxes, buy
houses, cars, and kept the economy rolling. Doesn't take a rocket scientist
to figure out Nafta and Cafta played a huge role in the downfall of America!

From 1970 until 2009, the automakers continued 'producing lots of cars'! The
plastic cars cost a fortune. Maintenance and repairs are huge. Didn't the
automakers, politicians, insurance companies and others that profited ever
stop to think about America's future? Who profited besides the plastic
manufacturers?

While I'm on a roll, it's time for AIG, Freddie, Fannie, several banks, GM,
Chrysler, and others taking Taxpayers money, to file bankruptcy, as they
need to learn how to run a private business, thus stopping the politicians
from taking control.

Politicians have some nerve saying that 'stronger government regulatory
power is essential and broader powers are needed by them?' Taxpayers would
be fools to let this happen after what's happened to America! You're not
entitled to any power!

Just think, Obama is now stating 'maybe, his new spending of almost another
four trillions will be partially paid off by 2012!' With What? Oh, I almost
forgot, 2012 is election year!

Comment: #2
Posted by: Shirley deLong
Thu Apr 2, 2009 8:11 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr.
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 20 Feb 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 19 Feb 2012

5 Feb 2009 Obama's First Two Weeks

11 Jun 2009 Israeli Settlements

27 Mar 2008 Hillary's Latest Whoppers