creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Paul Craig Roberts
Paul Craig Roberts
26 Mar 2010
Washington Murdered Privacy at Home and Abroad

In the Swiss newspaper Zeit-Fragen, Professor Dr. Eberhard Hamer from Germany asks, "How Sovereign is Europe?" … Read More.

19 Mar 2010
American Naifs Bringing Ruin to Other Lands

According to news reports, the U.S. military is shipping "bunker-buster" bombs to the U.S. Air … Read More.

17 Mar 2010
The Offshored Economy

In the 20th century, Detroit, Mich., symbolized American industrial might. Today it symbolizes the offshored economy. Detroit'… Read More.

Who Is Wrecking America?

Share Comment

Does the liberal-left have a clue? I sometimes think not.

In his book, "What's the Matter With Kansas? " Thomas Frank made the excellent point that the Karl Rove Republicans take advantage of ordinary's people's frustrations and resentments to lead them into voting against their best interests.

Frank's new book, "The Wrecking Crew: How Conservatives Rule," lacks the insight that distinguished his previous book. Why does Frank think that conservatives or liberals rule?

Neither rules. America is ruled by organized interest groups with money to elect candidates who serve their interests. Frank's book does not even mention the Israel lobby, which bleeds Americans for the sake of Israeli territorial expansion. Check the index. Israel is not there.

Does Frank think that rapture evangelicals are conservative, that Christian Zionists are conservative? If so, where did he learn his theology?

Frank can't tell the difference between Ronald Reagan and Cheney-Bush. He conflates the collection of opportunists and fanatics that comprise the Bush party with the Reagan conservatives who ended stagflation and the Cold War. The adventurer, Jack Abramoff, is Frank's epitome of a conservative. Abramoff is the most mentioned person in Frank's story. In Frank's view, conservatives are out to ruin everyone except the rich.

But it was the Clinton administration that rigged the Consumer Price Index in order to cheat retired people out of their Social Security cost of living increases.

It was the Clinton administration that vanished discouraged workers from the unemployment rolls.

It was the Clinton administration that wrecked "effective government" by encouraging early civil service retirements in order to make way for quota hires.

Why doesn't Frank know that the "Reagan deficit" was due to the collapse of inflation below the forecast, thus reducing the flow of inflated revenues into the government's budget, whereas the Bush deficit is a result of what Nobel Democrat economist Joe Stiglitz has calculated to be a $3 trillion dollar war in the Middle East?

Frank doesn't want to know. Like so many fighting ideological battles, he just wants to damn "the enemy."

But who is Frank's enemy? He calls them "conservatives." But the Bush regime is a neoconservative regime. Neoconservatives, despite the name, are not conservatives. They have taken over formerly conservative publications, think tanks and foundations, and driven out the conservatives.

Neoconservatives are in the tradition of the French Jacobins of the 18th century.

Having had the French Revolution, the revolutionaries thought that they should take it to all of Europe. Napoleon exercised French hegemony over Europe. The American neocons desire American hegemony over the world.

The true American conservative does not believe in foreign wars. In U.S. history, conservatives were derided by liberals as "isolationists."

There is nothing conservative about launching wars of aggression on the basis of lies and deception in order to control the direction of oil pipelines and to enhance Israeli territorial expansion.

Frank misses all of this.

And what a pity that is. A false conservative-liberal fight distracts attention from the growing police state that is destroying civil liberties for all Americans. It obscures the real motives of policies in behalf of special interests that are leading to nuclear confrontation with Russia and China.

What is wrecking America is not conservatives, but a neoconservative ideology of U.S. hegemony.

What is wrecking America is the "impeachment-is-off-the-table" twins, Nancy Pelosi and John Conyers.

What is wrecking America is the Democratic Party, which was put in control of the House and Senate in the 2006 congressional elections to stop the gratuitous wars and Gestapo police, but instead has continued to cooperate with the Cheney-Bush regime in behalf of war and police repression, such as we witnessed at the Republican National Convention.

Frank's book falls into the scapegoat category of blaming the innocent and irrelevant. The Democrat Party could impeach Cheney-Bush and cut off funding for the wars and corrupt military contracts. But it does nothing and gets a free pass from Frank.

"The Wrecking Crew" does have one virtue. Frank shows that the Republicans have spawned a new generation of Brownshirts that lust to imprison, torture and kill people. These ignorant bloodthirsty thugs see enemies everywhere and fervently desire to nuke them all. The Republican Brownshirts are equally willing to kill American critics of the Bush regime as to kill Taliban and al-Qaida.

The latest "enemy" is Russia. The Bush regime, complicit in its Georgian puppet's war crimes against South Ossetia, is attempting to hide its responsibility for ethnic cleansing by demonizing Russia. With every threat the Bush regime issues against Russia, the war drums beat louder. Yet the print and TV media and the Democratic Party have jumped on the war wagon.

The rapture evangelicals and the neocons are euphoric at the prospect of nuclear war. Frank's misguided barrage at conservatives, who are a brake on war and the police state, hastens end times.

To find out more about Paul Craig Roberts, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
Dr. Roberts,
Your articles on the Neo-Cons are right on target. But why do you call them Neo-cons when they are actually Zionists whose loyalty is to Israel's interests. I believe that the public would be more informed is you told this truth. Of course you might lose your job if you did this. Your latest article in this weeks AFP was top rate. Best Wishes. Thomas J. Miranda , PhD
Comment: #1
Posted by: Thomas J. Miranda
Sat Sep 6, 2008 9:02 PM
As a Christian Zionist, who was taught to expect the rapture c2000AD, I find anti-Zionism to be odd.
I never expected nuclear war, and still do not, although I believe some Any-Moment-Rapturists do find
descriptions in the Prophets of flesh being burned. I could never embrace a futuristic interpretation
of the Revelation, and embraced the Historical interpretation of the decendants of the Reformation when
I encountered it. In fact, I discovered the claim that the Futuristic interpretation was invented by a
pair of Jesuits seeking to answer the "Historicist" claim that "Pope is Antichrist", or more accurately,
"Pope is Beast", that is the first beast of Revelation chapter 13, if not the second beast also. I was
intrigued by the dialogue between Dispensationalists (Any Moment Raputure theorists) and Post-Millenialists.
As early as 1984, I was describing myself as a "Post-Millenial Dispensationalist", a better name is
Zionistic Post-Millenialist. I have embraced Barnabas' statement in chapter 15 of his epistle, that
history is created by God to last 7 millenia, the final millenium being the Sabbath millenium of "righteousness
covering the earth as the waters cover the seas", when we "beat our swords into plowshares and our spears
into pruninghooks." Actually, there has long been an expectation among the evangelicals that I know of this
fact (history is 7000 years), but without explicit scriptural basis, although Peter in one of his epistles writes
"one day is as a thousand years and a thousand years is as one day" to the Lord, apparently thinking of
Psalm 90 (or 91): A thousand years are as yesterday. I must lump all anti-Zionist Christians with the
modern day Post-Millenialist who call themselves "Reconstructionists". My problem with the "Reconstuctionists"
is that I cannot take seriously the idea that Medieval Europe was an ideal age. Gary North, in particular (the
inventor of the label Reconstructionist) is glad to be rid of anti-papal post-millenialism. In fact his father-in-law
R.J. Rushdoony modified his Monophisite Armenian religion by embracing the council of Chalcedon, where it was
decreed that Christ was fully God and fully man, with two natures, which were inseparable, plus 3 other adjectives.
The Armenian church was one of five Eastern churches that in the words of Cyril of Alexandria believed that Christ's human nature was "a drop in the sea" of his divine nature. The other extreme was Nestorius, who said
that he could not view the Ancient of Days as a babe in a manger. I have recently read that the Nestorian churches of which the Assyrian is the only one to my knowledge, chose to say that Christ actually had two persons, rather than two natures. Since at least 1984, I have looked for the fulfilment of Isaiah 19:22-25,
which pedicts a highway from Egypt through Israel into Assyria. I look forward to the partition of Iraq, with
El-Anbar uniting with Syria, for a resurrection of Assyria, as a Nestorian Christian nation!
Comment: #2
Posted by: John Mark Coney
Thu Sep 25, 2008 11:40 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Paul Craig Roberts
Mar. `10
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
R. Emmett Tyrrell
R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr.Updated 9 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 8 Feb 2012
Deb Saunders
Debra J. SaundersUpdated 8 Feb 2012

6 Mar 2009 Paul Craig Roberts, Part 1

16 Jan 2009 Will the Government Turn to the Printing Press?

22 Jul 2009 In an Impotent World Even the Bankrupt Can Prevail