creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Paul Craig Roberts
Paul Craig Roberts
26 Mar 2010
Washington Murdered Privacy at Home and Abroad

In the Swiss newspaper Zeit-Fragen, Professor Dr. Eberhard Hamer from Germany asks, "How Sovereign is Europe?" … Read More.

19 Mar 2010
American Naifs Bringing Ruin to Other Lands

According to news reports, the U.S. military is shipping "bunker-buster" bombs to the U.S. Air … Read More.

17 Mar 2010
The Offshored Economy

In the 20th century, Detroit, Mich., symbolized American industrial might. Today it symbolizes the offshored economy. Detroit'… Read More.

Americans: Serfs Ruled by Oligarchs

Share Comment

"In a little time [there will be] no middling sort. We shall have a few, and but a very few Lords, and all the rest beggars." — R.L. Bushman

"Rapidly you are dividing into two classes — extreme rich and extreme poor." — "Brutus"

Americans think that they have "freedom and democracy" and that politicians are held accountable by elections. The fact of the matter is that the United States is ruled by powerful interest groups who control politicians with campaign contributions. Our real rulers are an oligarchy of financial and military/security interests and AIPAC, which influences U.S. foreign policy for the benefit of Israel.

Have a look at economic policy. It is being run for the benefit of large financial concerns, such as Goldman Sachs.

It was the banks, not the millions of Americans, who have lost homes, jobs, health insurance and pensions, that received $700 billion in TARP funds. The banks used this gift of capital to make more profits. In the middle of the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression, Goldman Sachs announced record second- quarter profits and large six-figure bonuses for every employee.

The Federal Reserve's low interest rate policy is another gift to the banks. It lowers their cost of funds and increases their profits. With the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act in 1999, banks became high-risk investment houses that trade financial instruments, such as interest-rate derivatives and mortgage-backed securities. With abundant funds supplied virtually free by the Federal Reserve, banks are paying depositors virtually nothing on their savings.

Despite the Federal Reserve's low interest rate policy, beginning Oct. 1, banks are raising the annual percentage rate (APR) on credit card purchases, cash advances and on balances that have a penalty rate because of late payment. Banks are also raising the late fee. In the midst of the worst economy since the 1930s, heavily indebted Americans, who are losing their jobs and their homes, are to be bled into bankruptcy by the very banks that are being subsidized with TARP funds and low interest rates.

Moreover, it is the American public that is on the hook for the TARP money and the low interest rates. As the U.S. government's budget is 50 percent or more in the red, the TARP money has to be borrowed from abroad or monetized by the Fed. This means more pressure on the U.S. dollar's exchange value as well as a rise in import prices and domestic inflation.

Thus, Americans will pay the TARP and low interest rate subsidies to their financial rulers with erosion in the purchasing power of the dollar. What we are experiencing is a massive redistribution of income from the American public to the financial sector.

And this is occurring during a Democratic administration headed by America's first black president, with a Democratic majority in the House and Senate.

Is there a government anywhere that less represents its citizens than the U.S. government?

Consider America's wars. As of the moment of writing, the out-of-pocket cost of America's wars in Iraq and Afghanistan is $900 billion. When you add in the already incurred future costs of veterans' benefits, interest on the debt, the forgone use of the resources for productive purposes and such other costs — as computed by Nobel economist Joseph Stiglitz and Harvard University budget expert Linda Bilmes — "our" government has wasted $3,000 billion on two wars, which have no benefit whatsoever for any American whose income does not derive from the military/security complex, about which five-star general President Eisenhower warned us.

It is now a proven fact that the United States invasion of Iraq was based on lies and deception of the American public.

The only beneficiaries were the armaments industries, Blackwater, Halliburton, military officers who enjoy higher rates of promotion during war, and Muslim extremists whose case the U.S. government proved by its unprovoked aggression against Muslims. No one else benefited. Iraq was a threat to no one, and finding Saddam Hussein and executing him after a kangaroo trial had no effect on ending the war or preventing the start of others.

The cost of America's wars is a huge burden on a bankrupt country, but the cost incurred by veterans might be even higher. Homelessness is a prevalent condition of veterans, as is post-traumatic stress. American soldiers, who naively fought for the munitions industry's wars — for high compensation for the munitions CEOs and for dividends and capital gains for the munitions shareholders — paid not only with lives and lost limbs, but also with broken marriages, ruined careers, psychiatric disorders and prison sentences for failing to make child-support payments.

What did Americans gain from an unaffordable war in Iraq that lasted far longer than World War II and put into power Shiites allied with Iran?

The answer is obvious: nothing whatsoever.

What did the armaments industry gain? Billions of dollars in profits.

What about President Obama? "A corporate marketing creation," sums up the distinguished British journalist John Pilger.

Obama is the presidential candidate who promised to end the war in Iraq. He hasn't. But he has escalated the war in Afghanistan, started a new war in Pakistan, intends to repeat the Yugoslav scenario in the Caucasus and appears determined to start a war in South America. In response to the acceptance by U.S. puppet president of Columbia, Alvaro Uribe, of seven U.S. military bases in Columbia, Venezuela warned South American countries that the "winds of war are beginning to blow."

Here we have the U.S. government, totally dependent on the generosity of foreigners to finance its red ink, which extends in large quantities as far as the eye can see, completely under the thumb of the military/security complex, which will destroy us all in order to meet Wall Street share price expectations.

Why does any American care who rules Afghanistan? The country has nothing to do with us.

Did the armed services committees of the House and Senate calculate the risk of destabilizing nuclear-armed Pakistan when they acquiesced to Obama's new war there, a war that has already displaced 2 million Pakistanis?

No, of course not. The whores took their orders from the same military/security oligarchy that instructed Obama.

The great American superpower and its 300 million people are being driven straight into the ground by the narrow interest of the big banks and the munitions industry. People, and not only Americans, are losing their sons, husbands, brothers and fathers for no other reason than the profits of U.S. armaments corporations. And the gullible American people seem proud of it. Those ribbon decals on their cars, SUVs and monster trucks proclaim their naive loyalty to the armaments industries and to the whores in Washington who promote wars.

Will Americans, smashed and destroyed by "their" government's policy, which always puts Americans last, ever learn more about their real enemies?

Will Americans realize that they are not ruled by elected representatives, but by an oligarchy that owns the Washington whorehouse?

Will Americans ever understand that they are impotent serfs?

To find out more about Paul Craig Roberts, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS.COM


Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
I mean this: I don't think that God, or Jesus, or Mohammed, or any other High Being could have expressed things ANY BETTER than you, Paul C. Roberts, did in this article. I thank you, they thank you, and I pray that this article will be forwarded by many others, as I have forwarded to all those whose email addresses I have. Bless you, bless your writing, and bless all of us in this world, who are wrongly abused by this governments' "whores". That really is the correct word for what they are.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Melissa Balivet
Wed Aug 19, 2009 3:54 AM
Thank you for a wonderful article.
I wish that the New York Times and other propaganda oriented newspapers could convey to Americans what you have written here.
Kent Cooper was the head of Associated Press for 25 years. In his "The Right To Know" (1955), Cooper told how the press was used to take us into World War 1 and World War 2. He also told how our government, in the name of national security, was resorting to the same news suppression techniques as the communists Americans were told to fear. Nothing has changed. It's no wonder we live in an Orwellian world. This has been going on for a long long time.
You tell it like nobody else can.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Kevin Eggers
Wed Aug 19, 2009 11:13 AM
I'm a fan Mr. Roberts. Too much profit drives poor decisions: from the billions paid to CEO's of health care insurance, the military industrial complex, to the lobbies that can convince people to act in poor self interest. The hav's keep stirring people up with guns, gays, and god when none have any bearing on their well being. How in the world can anyone believe that a few more tax cuts and a few more wars would improve our condition?
Comment: #3
Posted by: der_spud
Thu Aug 20, 2009 5:16 AM
Obama is a shill of the corporate dominators of America. The only difference between him and Bush is he's more intelligent and a better speaker; in real substantive issues, he's serving the same masters but doing so with more gentleness and sophistication. The funny part is he's being attacked by ginned up know nothing Americans as being some sort of Commie; really, the rich are so clever; they give us an attractive figure, dress him up as a change candidate, have him do their bidding and then, in order to befuddle the masses, delude them into thinking he's a 'socialist", or "commie" all the while transferring more wealth from us to them, the exact opposite of what he's accused of doing. You've got to hand it to the rich, they didn't get that way by being stupid, lazy or shy. Nobody is more aggresive, blood thirsty or outright evil than some corporate CEO with 35% body fat, stooping shoulders and dandruff. Three cheers for the ruling class!
Comment: #4
Posted by: michael nola
Sat Aug 22, 2009 8:46 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Paul Craig Roberts
Mar. `10
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Lawrence Kudlow
Lawrence KudlowUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Joe Conason
Joe ConasonUpdated 16 Feb 2012

20 Jun 2009 Are the Iranian Election Protests Another U.S. Orchestrated "Color Revolution"?

30 Jul 2008 Are You Ready to Face the Facts About Israel?

3 Oct 2008 Can a Bailout Succeed?