opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Patrick Buchanan
Pat Buchanan
27 Mar 2015
The Enemy of My Enemy

The forces that do not want a U.S. nuclear deal with Iran, nor any U.S. detente with Iran, are impressive. … Read More.

24 Mar 2015
Are NGOs Agents of Subversion?

Though "Bibi" Netanyahu won re-election last week, the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations will … Read More.

20 Mar 2015
What Would Ike Do?

In November 1956, President Eisenhower, enraged he had not been forewarned of their invasion of Egypt, … Read More.

Yankee Utopians in a Chinese Century


For those who can yet recall the backyard blast furnaces of Mao's China in the 1950s and the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution to re-instill peasant values in the 1970s, the news was jarring.

In 2011, said the Financial Times, China will surpass the United States as first manufacturing power, a title America has held since surpassing Great Britain around 1890.

Each years, China passes a new milestone.

Last year, China surpassed Germany as the greatest exporting nation. This year, China surpasses Japan as the world's second-largest economy. This year, China became the first auto manufacturer on earth.

For a decade, China has been running history's largest trade surpluses with the United States and has amassed a hoard of $2.3 trillion in foreign currency. She now holds the mortgage on America.

How has China vaulted to the forefront in manufacturing, trade and technology? Export-driven economic nationalism.

Beijing cut the value of its currency in half in 1994, doubling the price of imports, slashing the price of exports and making Chinese labor the best bargain in Asia. Foreign firms were invited to relocate their plants in China and told this was the price of access to the Chinese market. Beijing began looting these firms of technology, as she sent her sons to study in America. Industrial espionage and intellectual property theft became Chinese specialties.

And how has America fared in the new century?

One in every three manufacturing jobs we had in 2000, nearly 6 million, vanished. Some 50,000 U.S. factories shut down. We have run trade deficits totaling $5 trillion since NAFTA passed. The real wages of working Americans have been stagnant for a decade.

While China has resumed her 12 percent growth rate, the United States, with 25 million unemployed or underemployed, appears headed for a double-dip recession.

Yet, even as the end of America's tenure as the world's first manufacturing power was being announced, The Wall Street Journal admonished us to keep our eyes on the prize: a new world order where it does not matter who produces what or where.

"The pursuit of some ideal global 'balance' in trade and capital flows is an illusion. ... World leaders would do better to worry less about (trade) imbalances and more about whether their own nations are pursuing policies that contribute to global prosperity."

There you have it — the conflict in visions between us.

For decades, America's leaders have followed the Wall Street Journal ideology.

We put a mythical world economy before our own economy. We put "global prosperity" before national interest. We forced our workers to compete, in their own country, against the products of foreign laborers earning a tenth of their pay. And we let in tens of millions of semi-skilled and unskilled immigrants, legal and illegal, to take the jobs of our countrymen.

And the Chinese? They put China first, second and third.

And who won the decade? And who is winning the future?

Inside the July 1 Washington Post is a small story about how the World Trade Organization finally ruled that European nations have been unfairly subsidizing Airbus — for 40 years.

While welcome, what good will it do now for scores of thousands of U.S. workers who built commercial jets for Lockheed and McDonnell Douglas, which Airbus took down, or Boeing, which was outsourcing jobs even before Airbus dethroned it as the world's No. 1 aircraft manufacturer.

Why did some U.S. president not tell the Europeans when they started this: Either stop subsidizing Airbus to kill our U.S. aircraft companies — or start defending yourselves against the Russians.

The day the FT reported that China was sweeping past us to become No. 1 in manufacturing, The New York Times ran a front-page story on the closing of the Whirlpool refrigerator plant in Evansville, Ind., and the loss of 1,100 jobs. The plant is moving to Mexico.

The Times spoke with Natalie Ford, a worker, whose husband and son also worked at Whirlpool, as had her dad, "This is all about corporate greed," Mrs. Ford said, "It's devastating to our family and to everyone in the plant. I wonder where we'll be two years from now. There aren't any jobs here. How is this community going to survive?"

"My mom and dad told me that when they were young, there were jobs everywhere. They said we had Whirlpool, Bristol-Myers, Mead Johnson, Windsor Plastics, Guardian Automotive, Zenith. Now if you want to find a job, there's nothing around."

"Free trade! Free trade!" said Henry Clay in the tariff debate of 1833. "The call for free trade is as unavailing as the cry of a spoiled child in its nurse's arms for the moon or the stars that glitter in the firmament of heaven. It has never existed. It will never exist."

It will only place us, said Clay, "under the commercial dominion of Great Britain." Today, it is the dominion of China.

Patrick Buchanan is the author of the book "Churchill, Hitler and 'The Unnecessary War." To find out more about Patrick Buchanan, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at



4 Comments | Post Comment
Mr. Buchanan, you are aware that devaluations of currencies, and competing devalutations of currencies by United States and Britain with the rest of the world are exactly what have been responsible for currency crises in United States and Britain. Including the situation that led Nixon to implement the Smithsonian agreement in the 1960s and the pre-war currency crisis?

Perhaps there is a reason why US and UK no longer devalue currencies the way China does. It is a dangerous path, leading to simultaneous inflation and recession.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Prateek Sanjay
Fri Jul 2, 2010 8:45 PM
Anyway, balance of trade or payments are arbitrary numbers.

A nation's wealth is in its goods and services, and not the medium of exchange by which goods and services are obtained.

If outflow of foreign exchange reserves is so bad for a country, it doesn't explain why Australia became such a rich nation with nothing but outflowing foreign exchange reserves. Australians have good housing, good utilities, good food supply, and other things than foreign exchange reserves in their central banks.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Prateek Sanjay
Fri Jul 2, 2010 8:51 PM
BOGUS 'America-Firster' LONG enmeshed RED China biz-nihilist
and 'conservative' frontman Buchanan continues to baulk the
"The Americans came just like a whore,
all dressed up and knocking at our back door--"
-Chou En Lai
In 2010 ----NEED WE SAY MORE?
Comment: #3
Posted by: tiger tim
Sun Jul 4, 2010 9:55 PM
Once again, Pat Buchanan identifies himself as one of the country's last true patriots. I vehemently disagree with his opinions on race, but in nearly every other area, Pat hits the nail precisely on the head. China is pursuing a strategy that is outwardly "free trade" but secretly protectionist. They think we are complete idiots for not doing the same.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Geoffrey James
Tue Jul 6, 2010 4:06 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Pat Buchanan
Mar. `15
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 30 Mar 2015
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 28 Mar 2015
Brent Bozell

14 Dec 2010 Can Democracy Cope?

10 Jul 2007 A Triumph for Traditionalists

30 May 2014 Is Obama Blundering Into a Syrian Quagmire?