 |
25 May 2012
The Unraveling Myth of Watergate
It was, they said, the crime of the century.
An attempted coup d'etat by Richard Nixon, stopped by two … Read More.
|
 |
22 May 2012
What If Zimmerman Walks Free?
Three months ago, George Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer in Sanford, Fla., shot and killed Trayvon Martin.
Handcuffed,… Read More.
|
 |
18 May 2012
Has the Bell Begun to Toll for the GOP?
Among the more controversial chapters in "Suicide of a Superpower," my book published last fall, … Read More.
|
|
Will Multiculturalism End Europe?
Multiculturalism has "totally failed," says German Chancellor Angela Merkel.
"State multiculturalism has had disastrous results," says Britain's David Cameron.
Is multiculturalism a failure in France? "My answer is clearly yes, it is a failure," says President Nicolas Sarkozy.
Ex-Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar has declared multiculturalism a failure in Spain, saying it divides and debilitates Western societies.
Only in Canada and the U.S., it seems, is the issue still in dispute.
Yet these European leaders are not leading anyone. They are far behind the people, and their belated appreciation of the idea of national identity is but a product of political panic. Take Merkel in Germany.
Last summer, Thilo Sarrazin published a book the title of which may be translated as "Germany Abolishes Itself."
Sarrazin argued that Germany's gastarbeiters, guest workers — Turks, Kurds, Arabs — are dumbing down the nation. While Germany's birth rate fell below replacement levels decades ago, these foreigners with less intelligence and much higher dropout, welfare and crime rates are rapidly replacing the declining German population.
"It is a matter of culture," said Sarrazin, and "Islam is the culture." This is why Muslim immigrants are "socially, culturally and intellectually inferior to most everyone else." Yet Sarrazin did use the phrase a "genetic minus" to describe migrants from the Middle East.
Were these the ravings of a neo-fascist intellectual and closet admirer of the late Fuhrer? Not at all. Sarrazin was a proud member of the Social Democratic Party of Willy Brandt and a board member of the Bundesbank.
With Merkel and the German establishment howling for his head, Thilo resigned, unrepentant. Two-thirds of Germans said he had a right to speak his mind, a third said they agreed with him, and "Germany Abolishes Itself" has sold over a million copies.
It was in response to the firestorm of the Sarrazin affair that Merkel discovered that multiculturalism was a failure. Her EU colleagues have since been falling all over one another to agree.
Another factor has contributed to the sudden awakening of the EU's elite — an explosion of anti-immigrant parties that are siphoning off working-class voters from socialist parties and nationalist voters from conservative parties.
Among these are Jean-Marie Le Pen's National Front in France, the British National Party, the Vlaams Belang in Belgium, Geert Wilders' Freedom Party in Holland, the Swiss People's Party of Christoph Blocher, which won the battle to ban the burka, the Austrian Freedom Party and Alliance for Austria's Future, the Jobbik Party of Hungary, the Lega Nord in Italy, which favors secession, the Danish People's Party, and the Sweden Democrats, who just won a toehold in parliament.
What these parties share is that all are anti-immigrant, anti-Muslim and ethnonational. They want to retain, or restore, a nation of, by and for their own kind, with its own history, holidays, heroes, language, literature, music and art. They are fiercely resistant to any dilution of the ethnic composition or cultural character of their countries.
What is the menace of multiculturalism these people see?
From Moscow to Marseilles, from Stockholm to Sicily, they see the Muslims pouring in and creating tiny nations within the nation, and being unwilling to embrace a new identity as Englishmen, French or German.
And their fears are not unjustified.
For just as the populist parties are deeply ethnonational, proud of their identity as Swiss, Austrian, German, English, Dutch or Flemish, the newcomers, too, are deeply ethnonational: Turkish, Arab and African.
And Islam is a faith that is itself anti-multicultural.
Devout Muslims do not believe all religions are equal. They believe there is one God, Allah, and submission to his law is the path to paradise. They do not believe in freedom of speech and the press if it means mocking the Prophet. They do not believe in Western dress codes or mixing men and women in schools and sports. They do not believe all lifestyles are equal. Some think adulterers should be stoned and honor killings are justified for girls who disgrace the family.
They wish to live their faith and their culture in our countries, to live alongside us but to dwell apart.
"If you come to France," said Sarkozy last week, "you accept to melt into a single community, which is the national community, and if you do not want to accept that, you cannot be welcome in France."
A little late for that. Some 5 million to 8 million Arabs and Muslims are in France, their birth rate is higher, and more are on the way.
The real questions: Whose idea was it to bring these people in? And what do France, Britain and Germany do if they say: This is a democracy, we will live as we wish to live, according to our beliefs, not yours.
How does a liberal, permissive society that celebrates diversity impose its values on a militant immigrant minority that rejects them?
Answer: It doesn't. All the rest is chatter.
This is what James Burnham meant when he wrote that liberalism is the ideology of Western suicide.
To find out more about Patrick Buchanan, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM

|
 |
Comments
|
7 Comments | Post Comment
|
|
Yes. It's very interesting question: Whose idea was it to bring these people in? an why?
The purpose of it was to destabilize and destroy European communities after WWII.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Joe
Tue Feb 15, 2011 2:49 AM
|
|
|
|
The Ethnocultural Amendment is the true Democracy Amendment, the missing eleventh Right of the Bill of Rights and an ethnoracial organizing principle par excellence.
The Ethnocultural Amendment
No citizen shall be denied or deprived of the right to an ethnoracial identity; no citizen shall be denied or deprived of the right to belong to an ethnoracial group; no ethnoracial group shall be denied or deprived of the right to ethnocultural sovereignty.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Luis Magno
Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:56 AM
|
|
|
|
"Behind the October Revolution there are more influential personalities than the thinkers and executors of Marxism."
- Lenin
The reign of the tolerance romantic is rapidly coming to an end in Europe and Australia, for the peoples of the world are beginning to wise up to the fact that they have been sold a bill of goods, with the "multicultural" paradigm. Further, they see it for what it is; the tool of enforcement for Marxist revolution across the globe.
And what is “multiculturalism?”
It is a fiction introduced to industrialized nations, via the international bankers, to hoodwink the peoples of the world into imagining that the destiny of the human race hinges on turning all nations into human petting zoos for serfs, resembling a United Nations model, where Marxist “political correctness” trumps the way of life for the host nation.
It is a formula of “fuzzy math” which ensures that the host nation will begin to resemble what President Theodore Roosevelt described as a “tangle of squabbling nationalities.”
Under this model, the basic premise is that anyone who stands for his race, culture or nation is to be labeled a “racist” by the “politically correct” Bolshevik commissars, as well as the unwitting third world corporate shock troops, who come into a nation at the behest of the international bankers, as a destabilizing influence.
“We call things racism just to get attention. We reduce complicated problems to racism, not because it is racism, but because it works.” ~ Alfredo Gutierrez, political consultant, as quoted by Richard de Uriarte, The Phoenix Gazette, March 14, 1992 (quoted in The ProEnglish Advocate, 1st quarter, 2002).
The so-called “guest worker” is employed by finance capital to rapidly dumb down a nation, so that it loses its patrimony and cultural identity, thereby paving the way for the ascendancy of Big Brother and a return to the feudal order at the hands of the oligarchy.
This modern day Inquisition, utilizes the charge of “racism” as its modern day “witch hunt.” Innocent people are then “put to the question” so as to distract them into defensive posture, so that they will not address the real menace. Meanwhile the real perpetrators of racism, get a free pass as so-called “minorities.”
If this reality were not so, Americans would not be witness to the double standard of justice of selective enforcement of the law, being meted out by Attorney General Eric H. Holder's Department of Justice.
The guest worker brings cultural chaos in his wake, as he prosecutes his own agenda of “jihad” or “La Reconquista” in both hemispheres of the planet.
Far too often, these affected nations perceive the guest worker alone to be the cause of their national misfortune, never taking into account the undue influence of a central banking system, based on parasitic usury. This usury drains the lifeblood from their respective republics, under fractional reserve banking.
Those degenerate lawmakers who argue for “comprehensive immigration reform,” would have us all believe that the immigration system is “broken” and that the problem is unique to the Western Hemisphere alone, insofar as the whole affair merely consists in ironing out “a few minor details,” so that persecuted slave workers who broke into the national house as burglars, can ostensibly “come out of the shadows.”
Meanwhile, the American people remain in those shadows, losing their homes, factors of production and jobs to the interlopers, as they witness the “poor mestizo” marching as an occupation army on America's city streets and cheekily raising the Mexican banner over American territory.
Anyone with gray matter can see that the modus operandi of Big Brother's Ministry of Truth is to repeat the lie often enough so that it becomes sacred dogma.
Illegal alien invaders are continuously referred to with the Newspeak of Big Brother as being “undocumented workers,” or “immigrants.”
The German people of the 1940's unconsciously understood the predatory nature of the international bankers and that is why they developed the concepts of “blood and soil” and Lebensborn to protect their nation from the undue influence of alien peoples.
The many excesses of the Nazi regime ensured that these two valuable concepts would be dispensed with and rejected by throwing out the baby, with the dirty Nazi bath water.
As a result of this revulsion to making babies, coupled with the feminist and free love movements of the 1960's, an entire generation rejected the responsibility of ensuring continuity for the perpetuation of the ancestral line.
DINK; double income, no kids, was to be the acronym for the new upwardly mobile success story.
This “modern outlook” has led to Europe not being able to sustain replacement population levels, which has proven to be a boon for the third world worker, who has no trouble in reproducing his kind and even flaunting it:
"Go back to Boston! Go back to Plymouth Rock, Pilgrims! Get out! We are the future. You are old and tired. Go on. We have beaten you. Leave like beaten rats. You old white people. It is your duty to die. .. Through love of having children, we are going to take over." -- Augustin Cebeda, Brown Berets
The soaring birth rate of the guest worker populations, has been employed as a strategy of stealth warfare by these foreign intruders, to replace the host population through alien demographics. It is cultural genocide against white nations, with a parasitic people eating out the substance of the host nation from within.
In short, what transpires is that the third world “guests” deposit their eggs in the nest of the host nation for incubation, thereby making it mandatory that the taxpayers selected as host, will have to subsidize their own national and racial eclipse.
The process is most vividly illustrated in the British Isles, where the Muslim encroachment is far advanced and where Muslims march in the city streets of the host nation, making vile threats in much the same manner Mexican nationals do on America's city streets.
This “political correctness” which in reality was a prime opportunity for the Bolshevik weltanschauung to come to the fore, became the new process for undermining nations in a pincer movement of deficit financing and foreign invasion by the wretched Third World.
Both Europe and America are beginning to realize that something they formerly considered to be evil, is in fact the law of nature; the predatory law of the sea.
The power determined by numbers in population, abhors a vacuum.
If white nations refuse to maintain their birth rates, they will soon see that they will not only lose self-determination in their own homeland, but indeed they will become witness to the loss of their country through balkanization.
The process is now so well advanced, that nations in both hemispheres of the planet are contemplating financial ruination, as they are offered a “global currency” by the very same forces which so successfully engineered the failure of the nation-state concept, by willfully bankrupting it with usury and the drain on the social safety net, imposed by freeloaders from the Third World.
The most powerful nation in the history of mankind, was slated by these bankers to become a “safety valve” for failed nations. This agenda fell perfectly into alignment with the concept that the American taxpayer should serve as Santa Claus to the world, through foreign aid programs.
Foreign aid is the Mother of All Foreign Entanglements and it should be the first target of those politicians who make the empty boast of “welfare reform.” Corporate bailouts are another welfare program the American people have been forced to adopt, along with the third world baby population.
It is ironic that these two gaping holes in the hull of our ship of state should not be plugged, when standard practice of our lawmakers is to have the American taxpayer bail out the flooding of deficit, with a cut in entitlement programs for America's poor.
The thimble of America's poverty is employed as a bailing tool, when the bucket of corporate fraud should be utilized.
This injustice is the hallmark of the supranational agenda of America's secret government, the Council on Foreign Relations, as promulgated by its founder, David Rockefeller.
With the loss of a nation's purse strings and national identity, comes the brave new world of universal slavery for all of mankind.
The plan of these banking swindlers, if for the peoples of the world to abandon their freedom and identity to “global cooperation” through the phony storefront of the international bankers--the United Nations-- with its attendant one world government.
What nations are now witness to, is the final showdown which determines the survival of the nation-state, or surrender to one world government and bureaucracy.
The day of reckoning has now arrived where all nations of the world must ask themselves whether they wish to go quietly into the brave new world of slavery at the hands of a central global authority, or whether they wish to remain free to pursue life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness on the American model.
“Political correctness,” guest workers and “multiculturalism” will lead to the hegemony and final victory of Marxist revolution and ultimately to the loss of freedom for all of mankind, as the feudal order is reestablished by the oligarchy.
The survival of the nation-state for all men, hinges on the perpetuation of the American revolutionary model--not the “democratization” of the Council on Foreign Relations, which holds America's foreign policy under hijack to corporate aims and Don Quixote quests of “nation-building” and border-defending everywhere but home.
The great struggle now being witnessed by mankind is not confined to any one country, but has entered the phase where it is a contest between the peoples of the world vs. the banks.
"The issue which has swept down the centuries and which will have to be fought sooner or later is The People vs. The Banks."
- Lord Acton, Lord Chief Justice of England, 1875
That day has now arrived.
If usury is not destroyed by the nations of the world, they will soon find that their dearest interests, hopes, dreams and aspirations will succumb to extinction under debt slavery to these international bankers, who manufacture money out of thin air.
"The modern banking system manufactures money out of nothing. The process is perhaps the most astounding piece of sleight of hand that was ever invented. Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create deposits, and with the flick of the pen they will create enough deposits to buy it all back again. However, take this great power away from them, and all the great fortunes like mine disappear, and they ought to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of Bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create money and control credit."
- Sir Josiah Stamp, President of the Bank of England in the 1920s, the second richest man in Britain
The international bankers are the true enemy of mankind, as is their "multicultural" model.
Comment: #3
Posted by: T.H. Asgardson
Tue Feb 15, 2011 7:02 PM
|
|
|
|
"Multiculturalism" is a modern fraud masquerading as a substitute for the American People's God-given unalienable ethnoracial rights, rights missing from the Bill of Rights in appeasement of the slave-owners and the Money Power at the time of the framing of the Constitution in 1787-89.
The ethnocultural rights protected by the proposed Ethnocultural Amendment would have prohibited Black slavery and Indigenous genocide hence its omission as a concession to the slave owners and the Money Power who were willing to wait another two centuries before their final enslavement of mankind.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Luis Magno
Wed Feb 16, 2011 2:02 PM
|
|
|
|
"The real question: Whose idea was it to bring these people in?"
The answer is, of course, evident.
Mr. Buchanan carefully avoids it - he doesn't want to be termed 'anti-semitic'.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Sylvie
Sun Feb 20, 2011 7:20 PM
|
|
|
|
Re: T.H. Asgardson
"The many excesses of the Nazi regime ... "
The biggest excess of the Nazis was to limit the power of an ethnic network in control of banking, newspapers, law business (and prostitution) and to fight both multicultural internationalisms: communism and democracy/capitalism.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Sylvie
Sun Feb 20, 2011 7:23 PM
|
|
|
|
---"We will use MASSIVE third world immigration
to destroy British culture beyond repair within a
decade of two."
-TONY BLAIR
(leaked interview cited by ALan Watt online)
Rockefeller front op., 'Right Wing' fake out, Pat Buchanan,
for all the set-up bluster, maintains perfect contuity of agenda
with the ultimate Globalist aim of TOTAL sellout of America to
RED Chinese ascendancy ----and the 'EUGENICS friendly'
scientific dicatatorship of tomorrow.
He's REALLY Newt Gingrich with some red meat demagogic trimmings.
----STEER CLEAR!
Think Nxon/MAO, the 1972 sellout to end all sellouts.
Buchanan was there! A willing, eager helpmate!
HUAC meets NUREMBERG --------------NOW!
Comment: #7
Posted by: free bee
Thu Feb 24, 2011 8:00 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Author’s Podcast
|