creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Patrick Buchanan
Pat Buchanan
14 Feb 2012
On to Tehran -- or Is It Damascus?

Our War Party has been temporarily diverted from its clamor for war on Iran by the insurrection against the … Read More.

10 Feb 2012
Obama's Trampling on God's Turf Now

Yes, Virginia, there is a religious war going on. It is for the soul of America. And traditional Christianity … Read More.

7 Feb 2012
Who Wants War With Iran?

Appearing alongside CIA Director David Petraeus before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence last week, … Read More.

Who Killed Detroit?

Share Comment

Who killed the U.S. auto industry?

To hear the media tell it, arrogant corporate chiefs failed to foresee the demand for small, fuel-efficient cars and made gas-guzzling road-hog SUVs no one wanted, while the clever, far-sighted Japanese, Germans and Koreans prepared and built for the future.

I dissent. What killed Detroit was Washington, the government of the United States, politicians, journalists and muckrakers who have long harbored a deep animus against the manufacturing class that ran the smokestack industries that won World War II.

As far back as the 1950s, an intellectual elite that produces mostly methane had its knives out for the auto industry of which Ike's treasury secretary, ex-GM chief Charles Wilson, had boasted, "What's good for America is good for General Motors, and vice versa."

"Engine Charlie" was relentlessly mocked, even in Al Capp's L'il Abner cartoon strip, where a bloviating "General Bullmoose" had as his motto, "What's good for Bullmoose is good for America!"

How did Big Government do in the U.S. auto industry?

Washington imposed a minimum wage higher than the average wage in war-devastated Germany and Japan. The Feds ordered that U.S. plants be made the healthiest and safest worksites in the world, creating OSHA to see to it. It enacted civil rights laws to ensure the labor force reflected our diversity. Environmental laws came next, to ensure U.S. factories became the most pollution-free on earth.

It then clamped fuel efficiency standards on the entire U.S. car fleet.

Next, Washington imposed a corporate tax rate of 35 percent, raking off another 15 percent of autoworkers' wages in Social Security payroll taxes

State governments imposed income and sales taxes, and local governments property taxes to subsidize services and schools.

The United Auto Workers struck repeatedly to win the highest wages and most generous benefits on earth — vacations, holidays, work breaks, health care, pensions — for workers and their families, and retirees.

Now there is nothing wrong with making U.S. plants the cleanest and safest on earth or having U.S. autoworkers the highest-paid wage earners.

That is the dream, what we all wanted for America.

And under the 14th Amendment, GM, Ford and Chrysler had to obey the same U.S. laws and pay at the same tax rates. Outside the United States, however, there was and is no equality of standards or taxes.

Thus when America was thrust into the Global Economy, GM and Ford had to compete with cars made overseas in factories in postwar Japan and Germany, then Korea, where health and safety standards were much lower, wages were a fraction of those paid U.S.

workers, and taxes were and are often forgiven on exports to the United States.

All three nations built "export-driven" economies.

The Beetle and early Japanese imports were made in factories where wages were far beneath U.S. wages and working conditions would have gotten U.S. auto executives sent to prison.

The competition was manifestly unfair, like forcing Secretariat to carry 100 pounds in his saddlebags in the Derby.

Japan, China and South Korea do not believe in free trade as we understand it. To us, they are our "trading partners." To them, the relationship is not like that of Evans & Novak or Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers. It is not even like the Redskins and Cowboys. For the Cowboys only want to defeat the Redskins. They do not want to put their franchise out of business and end the competition — as the Japanese did to our TV industry by dumping Sonys here until they killed it.

While we think the Global Economy is about what is best for the consumer, they think about what is best for the nation.

Like Alexander Hamilton, they understand that manufacturing is the key to national power. And they manipulate currencies, grant tax rebates to their exporters and thieve our technology to win. Last year, as trade expert Bill Hawkins writes, South Korea exported 700,000 cars to us, while importing 5,000 cars from us.

That's Asia's idea of free trade.

How has this Global Economy profited or prospered America?

In the 1950s, we made all our own toys, clothes, shoes, bikes, furniture, motorcycles, cars, cameras, telephones, TVs, etc. You name it. We made it.

Are we better off now that these things are made by foreigners? Are we better off now that we have ceased to be self-sufficient? Are we better off now that the real wages of our workers and median income of our families no longer grow as they once did? Are we better off now that manufacturing, for the first time in U.S. history, employs fewer workers than government?

We no longer build commercial ships. We have but one airplane company, and it outsources. China produces our computers. And if GM goes Chapter 11, America will soon be out of the auto business.

Our politicians and pundits may not understand what is going on. Historians will have no problem explaining the decline and fall of the Americans.

Patrick Buchanan is the author of the new book "Churchill, Hitler and 'The Unnecessary War." To find out more about Patrick Buchanan, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
Hey Byuke. You're the big historian. Remember when George Bush Senior went and visited the Japanese prime minister in 1992 and wound up puking on his foot? He was there, among other things, to beg the Japanese auto industry to take it easy on us. One of the things said just prior to the great reverse peristaltic episode was how huge the difference was between the ratio of CEO compensation and line worker compensation in the U.S. compared to that in Japan. Hint hint. Urp, splat.
The U.S. auto industry has failed because of resting on its laurels in a market skewed to the preferences of the chosen ones, i.e., because of that great human failing best characterized by the motto "we don't care, we don't have to."
They had it all their way, except for the pesky UAW, and boy they will go to their graves trying to get back at those uppity workers who had the gall to demand a pension when they were too old to work, health care when they got sick, and a living wage while they were healthy enough to work. To those pointy headed liberals and intellectuals who said we want cars with gas mileage that passes the straight face test and don't fall apart after a year or two, they raised their middle fingers, spat out their epithets, and cackled all the way to the bank. ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
The truth is, they just plain sucked at what they were doing. End of story. They didn't give a flying you know what as long as they were making money, and they didn't lift a finger to exercise industry leadership. If they had been guilty of that in China they probably would be hauled before a firing squad along with that health ministry guy who took bribes to approve drugs, and they would deserve it. ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
The answer is not to just lend those idiots more money. They all need to be fired and sent to China. The government needs to keep the industry and staff it with entirely new management, with a mandate to do the equivalent of what putting a man on the moon meant to us in 1960. It can be done. It takes will power, national pride, using the gray matter that God gave us, and throwing the bums out.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Masako
Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:32 PM
Sir;...I don't disagree much with Mr. Masako... But I would say first that you are good to not put it all on the unions the way a lot esses are, and second; that you illustrate how much an anarchy our economy is...Things might be different if the country ran these essential industries rather than the rich generally running the country......If you tell me we actually need all these auto producers fighting for the same market, and I will tell you that you are full of methane, because without control, they all saturate the market with over production and when that happens, the factory can sit, but the people cannot. There is a strong anti union feeling in this country that is really anti democracy... And I have heard it preached by television ministries....And I think the desire is to keep workers from getting the idea that they have a right to a vote... I like a democratic work place, and a democratic society and I accept no substitutes.... All you have to do is reflect on how improved our autos have become in thirty years to realize they are making progress; but at whose expense??? Every foreign factory here means one less US plant... Every new contract means less workers and more worked farmed out....Every year means more machines, robots doing more of the work in air not fit to breath of floors to greasy to walk on, and they don't buy cars, and they don't retire till they cart them off to the junk pile. I have seen the future in those plants, and it is not kind to workers... So I appreciate that you do not put it all on the union... Those people work hard in places I could never wait to get out of, and the more they earned the more uncle sugar took out of them... If the rich paid taxes on their wealth they would have given more care to the way they ran things... But, what are people going to do??? If the Anti Union South breaks the auto industry just because they hate the unions, they are going to find themselves hurt too... But you can't have a half way union country, and no one should have a union; but demand that the government act as our union...It is the willingness of the people to pursue individually those goals neglected by the government in the preamble, that has kept our government alive supplying poorly -only the most basic needs of the people... Where was government when the big three was stuck in the mud, or when the executives were watering the stock, or exporting our jobs??? The government puts it all on Dingle...What jackesses... They should all be crucified... Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #2
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Fri Nov 21, 2008 5:45 AM
Sir;...There is something else that I would like to mention, and it is how often I have heard bankruptcy put forward was a way to break union contracts, and be rid of legacy costs such as pensions and health care...I think they should do it; and not because it is right to do, but because they can do it... There is no reason for anyone to make a bargain with anyone in this world if one side can unilateraly avoid their obligaton...It takes more than contracts to make a bargain... It takes honor... In our society money has become a fair substitute for honor... People can live without honor, but no one can live without money.... If you read enough into history you see that what we take for granted, primitive people wouldn't have stood for a moment... Even today, in some part of the world, a man might kill his own children if he thinks they have dishonored him, because honor is their economy the way money is ours...Let us kill honor in this society...Let us all run into bankruptcy for protection...Let us all forget our honorably assumed obligations, our marriages, our children, all our oaths... People can live without honor...Thanks..Sweeney
Comment: #3
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Fri Nov 21, 2008 6:26 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Pat Buchanan
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 15 Feb 2012

13 Apr 2010 Katyn and 'The Good War'

30 Dec 2008 Bush, Obama and the Gaza Blitz

18 Apr 2008 Who's Behind the Proxy Wars