creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Patrick Buchanan
Pat Buchanan
17 Feb 2012
The New Blacklist

My days as a political analyst at MSNBC have come to an end. After 10 enjoyable years, I am departing, after … Read More.

14 Feb 2012
On to Tehran -- or Is It Damascus?

Our War Party has been temporarily diverted from its clamor for war on Iran by the insurrection against the … Read More.

10 Feb 2012
Obama's Trampling on God's Turf Now

Yes, Virginia, there is a religious war going on. It is for the soul of America. And traditional Christianity … Read More.

The Real War

Share Comment

Had he not proven incompetent to detonate his lap bomb, Umar Farouk Abdulmullatab would have carried off an air massacre to rival Lockerbie. We would all have ended Christmas day watching TV footage of 300 mangled bodies being picked up around Detroit.

The system breakdown was total. His father had reported to the U.S. embassy that Umar had gone extremist, disowned his family and vanished in Yemen. Though the 23-year-old Nigerian had been put on a U.S. terrorist watch list and denied a visa to enter Britain, his U.S. visa was not revoked.

Though he had been in Yemen for months, bought his plane ticket in cash and boarded without luggage, he was neither red-flagged nor screened or body-searched.

We were spared the horrible consequences of our incompetence, only because of his incompetence. The episode raises questions not only about airline security, but about how we are fighting the real war we are in.

Defeating al-Qaida calls for ways and means different from dealing with domestic crime families like the Gottis or Gambinos.

Organized crime is the province of police and prosecutors.

Crime bosses are read their rights and granted access to a lawyer. They come into court in suits to undergo a fair and equal contest to ascertain guilt or innocence. If acquitted, they walk free.

This 23-year-old Nigerian is an enemy combatant whose way of war is mass murder. Under the rules of war, he may be shot. The immediate imperative was not to read him his Miranda rights or to phone Ron Kuby. It was to subject Abdulmullatab to intense and hostile interrogation so that U.S. forces can quickly find, fix, attack and kill his comrades and camp followers.

Unlike the war on crime, or the war on drugs, this is not a metaphorical war. There is no presumption of innocence, rather a presumption that Umar is a terrorist and did not act alone.

The questions he should have been asked as soon as he was pulled off the plane and hauled to a prison hospital are these:

Who taught you to detonate a bomb? Who sewed the underwear in which you concealed the components? Who was with you in Yemen? What are the names of those you trained with? Who helped you get on that plane? Who did you stay with on your visits to the U.S.? Who gave you cash? Who paid your bills? Where is your computer? And if you want pain medicine for those burns, you will tell us.

A question arises after the lackadaisical way the administration first dealt with this potential horror.

Are we governed by serious people? A second question is raised by the ideological journey of this 23-year-old from devout Muslim to extremist to terrorist, and by his sojourn from Nigeria to London to Yemen to America.

In Omar Bradley's comment on Korea, are we fighting the wrong war, in the wrong place, at the wrong time, with the wrong enemy?

Obama just ordered 30,000 more troops into Afghanistan. Yet, even if Gens. David Petraeus and Stanley McChrystal pull it off and pacify Kandahar, how does that protect the American homeland from suicide bombers hell-bent on blowing up airliners?

How does turning the tide in Afghanistan stop radical Muslim youth in Africa or Arabia from being trained to board planes with bombs and blow them up over the Atlantic? How do 130,000 U.S. soldiers in Iraq make us more safe from an al-Qaida that has moved into Waziristan, Baluchistan, Yemen, Somalia and North Africa?

The Sept. 11 massacre may have been decided upon in Afghanistan. But the perpetrators were Saudis and Egyptians who plotted, planned and trained in Germany, Boston, Delray Beach and Northern Virginia.

How has occupying two nations at a cost of 5,000 dead, 35,000 wounded and a trillion dollars made us safer from an enemy that more resembles the Apache of Geronimo than the panzers of Rommel?

If protection of the homeland against another Sept. 11 is the goal of this war, how relevant to that goal is the building of clinics and schools in Kabul and keeping the Taliban at bay in Helmand?

Are we fighting other people's wars, rather than our own war?

We Americans are today widely hated in the Arab and Islamic world by scores of millions, out of whom al-Qaida need but recruit a few hundred suicide bombers to wreak havoc on our country.

Does having 200,000 U.S. troops in their part of the world, fighting and killing Muslims, make our country more secure than defending our borders, keeping radicals out, running al-Qaida down, and tracking and killing them where they are?

To win the war we are in, we have to fight the war we are in, not the war we prefer to fight because no one else is so good at it.

Patrick Buchanan is the author of the new book "Churchill, Hitler and 'The Unnecessary War." To find out more about Patrick Buchanan, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
Sir;... I agree that the system breakdown is total, and the system break down was total with 911...If heads had rolled, all the way up to the president, who was sitting on his hands we might have given a powerful lesson to those who accept the pay for jobs they will not do...Look at the situation: given great power to spy domestically the government decided to collect every scrap of information from all citizens communicating abroad... Why let a little thing like arbitrary power sit idle; even though it completely overwhelmed the system to take so much more than it could swallow... We have over 500K people on a watch list...My bet is that no one ever gets a point for taking a name off, and gets a point for adding a name; but the sheer number becomes too great to manage, because that is their idea of managment, to pigeon hole some one and go looking for more...How about finding out if they need to be there??? If they need to be there how about making certain they never fly or get a visa...People like you who seem to think the system should be the cure will never understand that the system, all the systems are the problem because they exists to deflect responsibility to such an extent that success can be rewarded, and failure never punished...Do you suppose it is possible, that people abroad wishing to attack us really hate our systems.???..Do you suppose if it were possible that they could not attack the military and government directly; and that Intead, they will take out their futility against the very system that plagues us, that takes our resources in spades, but gives us protection by the teaspoon???...Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Fri Jan 1, 2010 10:26 AM
Re: James A, Sweeney: Yup, just the same as 9/11. Yet another police failure, nothing more and nothing less. Just the product we can count on from a bunch of painstakingly indifferent government bureaucrats who shuffle along and collect that paycheck every two weeks. As you put it, what should we expect when we neither reward success nor punish failure? We can create all the super-duper new counter-terrorism agencies we want, give them all great and magnificent names, send innocent kids half-way across the glove to murder other innocent kids, and on and on and on, but these incidents of "terrorism" (is it any less a matter of terrorism when innocent people can't walk down a crime-ridden city street at night without fearing being mugged or worse?) are all just about the incompetence of our nation's police work. All those idiotic conservatives had to do after 9/11 was remember that we needed to get back to the basics and walk the walk. Needed to then and still need to now, because we've done everything but, and it shows in so many ways.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Masako
Fri Jan 1, 2010 11:17 AM
It's been a while, quite a while since I fully agreed with you. I do on this one. Your reasoned and logical comments are right on. Pity such a fine mind is skewed on so many other subjects.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Arthur Finn
Fri Jan 1, 2010 1:35 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Pat Buchanan
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 20 Feb 2012
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 18 Feb 2012

8 Apr 2008 Onward the Revolution!

17 Apr 2007 Wolfie's Bank

8 May 2009 Jim Crow Liberalism