creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Patrick Buchanan
Pat Buchanan
14 May 2013
The Heretic at Heritage

Jason Richwine, the young conservative scholar who co-authored the Heritage Foundation report on the long-… Read More.

10 May 2013
Requiem for a Grand Old Party

Has the bell begun to toll for the GOP? The question arises while reading an analysis of Census Bureau … Read More.

7 May 2013
Who Are the War Criminals in Syria?

Last week, several polls came out assessing U.S. public opinion on intervention in Syria. According to the … Read More.

The Pope and Godless Capitalism

Comment

"This is called slave labor," said Pope Francis.

The Holy Father was referring to the $40 a month paid to apparel workers at that eight-story garment factory in Bangladesh that collapsed on top of them, killing more than 400.

"Not paying a just wage ... focusing exclusively on the balance books, on financial statements, only looking at personal profit. That goes against God!"

The pope is describing the dark side of globalism.

Why is Bangladesh, after China, the second-largest producer of apparel in the world? Why are there 4,000 garment factories in that impoverished country which, a few decades ago, had almost none?

Because the Asian subcontinent is where Western brands — from Disney to Gap to Benetton — can produce cheapest. They can do so because women and children will work for $1.50 a day crammed into factories that are rickety firetraps, where health and safety regulations are nonexistent.

This is what capitalism, devoid of a conscience, will produce.

Rescuers at the factory outside Dhaka have stopped looking for survivors, but expect to find hundreds more bodies in the rubble.

The Walt Disney Co., with sales of $40 billion a year, decided — after an apparel plant fire in November took the lives of 112 workers — to stop producing in Bangladesh. "The Disney ban now extends to other countries, including Pakistan," says The New York Times, "where a fire last September killed 262 garment workers."

Not long ago, the shirts, skirts, suits and dresses Americans wore were "Made in the USA" — in plants in the Carolinas, Georgia and Louisiana, where the lower wages, lighter regulations and air conditioning that came after World War II had attracted the factories from New England.

The American idea was that the 50 states and their citizens should compete with one another fairly. The feds set the health and safety standards that all factories had to meet, and imposed wage and hour laws. Some states offered lower wages, but there was a federal minimum wage.

How did we prevent companies from shutting down here and going to places like today's Bangladesh to produce as cheaply as they could — without regard for the health and safety of their workers — and to send their products back here and kill the American factories?

From James Madison to the mid-20th century, we had a tariff.

This provided revenue for the U.S.

government to keep other taxes low and build the nation's infrastructure. Tariffs prevented exploiters of labor from getting rich here on sweatshops abroad.

Tariffs favored U.S. companies by letting them compete for free in the U.S. market, while a cover charge was placed on foreign goods entering the U.S.A. Foreign producers would pay tariffs for the privilege of competing here, while U.S. companies paid income taxes.

Foreigners had to buy a ticket to the game. Americans got in free.

After all, it's our country, isn't it?

But in the late 20th century, America abandoned as "protectionism" what Henry Clay had called The American System. We gave up on economic patriotism. We gave up on the idea that the U.S. economy should be structured for the benefit of America and Americans first.

We embraced globalism.

The ideological basis of globalism was that, just as what was best for America was a free market where U.S. companies produce and sell anywhere freely and equally in the U.S.A., this model can be applied worldwide.

We can create a global economy where companies produce where they wish and sell where they wish.

As one might expect, the big boosters of the concept were the transnational corporations. They could now shift plants and factories out of the high-wage, well-regulated U.S. economy to Mexico, China and India, then to Bangladesh, Haiti and Cambodia, produce for pennies, ship their products back to the U.S.A., sell here at the same old price, and pocket the difference.

As some who were familiar with the decline of Great Britain predicted, this would lead inexorably to the deindustrialization of America, a halt to the steady rise in U.S. workers' wages and standard of living, and the enrichment of a new class of corporatists.

Meanwhile, other nations, believing yet in economic nationalism, would invade and capture huge slices of the U.S. market for their home companies, their "national champions." The losers would be the companies that stayed in the U.S.A. and produced for the U.S.A., with American workers.

And so it came to pass. U.S. real wages have not risen in 40 years.

In the first decade of the century, America lost 5 million to 6 million manufacturing jobs, one in every three we had, as 55,000 factories closed.

Since Bush 41 touted his New World Order, we have run trade deficits of $10 trillion — ten thousand billion dollars! Everybody — the EU, China, Japan, Mexico, Canada — now runs a trade surplus at the expense of the U.S.A.

We built the global economy — by gutting our own.

Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of "Suicide of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025?" To find out more about Patrick Buchanan and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate webpage at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2013 CREATORS.COM



Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
Peter Drucker warned us about the dangers of multi-national corporations escaping the control of any government and giving us the result we see today. In every college economics class students learn the holy grail: Maximize Revenues and Minimize Expenditures (the difference=profit). This is why chicken manure is used for animal feed for beef and dairy production. It is why a garment factory in Bangladesh runs no differently than a chicken farm that maximizes egg production at least cost possible.
Comment: #1
Posted by: john koroloff
Fri May 3, 2013 7:15 AM
Peter Drucker warned us about the dangers of multi-national corporations escaping the control of any government and giving us the result we see today. In every college economics class students learn the holy grail: Maximize Revenues and Minimize Expenditures (the difference=profit). This is why chicken manure is used for animal feed for beef and dairy production. It is why a garment factory in Bangladesh runs no differently than a chicken farm that maximizes egg production at least cost possible.
Comment: #2
Posted by: john koroloff
Fri May 3, 2013 7:15 AM
Re: john koroloff
Amen

"In the first decade of the century, America lost 5 million to 6 million manufacturing jobs, one in every three we had, as 55,000 factories closed" - so 6 million jobs lost over 10 years, on Obamma's 2 year watch is 600,000 X 2 or another 1,200,000 jobs lost since Obama took the wheel.

And Pez Obama's plan to correct this slaughter of the middle class is?
Let the fed print so much cash as to devalue the dollar so our exports are cheap?
But in fact all this does is create inflation (check the price of a BigMac) and drive China's GDP

So we have a president and congress who are __________ (you fill in the blank)
Sadly, some pundits predict the rise of a welcomed dictator in America's future as the people finally realize the current government does not __________ (you fill in the blank)

I say roll Canada, USA, and Mexico into one giant country, hey at least Canada has oil......

Comment: #3
Posted by: Soothsayer
Fri May 3, 2013 10:54 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Pat Buchanan
May. `13
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Walter Williams
Walter E. WilliamsUpdated 15 May 2013
Dennis Prager
Dennis PragerUpdated 14 May 2013
David Limbaugh
David LimbaughUpdated 14 May 2013

26 Dec 2008 George Bush, Protectionist

16 Mar 2010 The Poodle Gets Kicked

2 Feb 2007 And Who Isolated Us?