creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Patrick Buchanan
Pat Buchanan
25 May 2012
The Unraveling Myth of Watergate

It was, they said, the crime of the century. An attempted coup d'etat by Richard Nixon, stopped by two … Read More.

22 May 2012
What If Zimmerman Walks Free?

Three months ago, George Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer in Sanford, Fla., shot and killed Trayvon Martin. Handcuffed,… Read More.

18 May 2012
Has the Bell Begun to Toll for the GOP?

Among the more controversial chapters in "Suicide of a Superpower," my book published last fall, … Read More.

The New Intolerance

Share Comment

"This was a recognition of American terrorists."

That is CNN's Roland Martin's summary judgment of the 258,000 men and boys who fell fighting for the Confederacy in a war that cost as many American lives as World Wars I and II, Korea, Vietnam and Iraq combined.

Martin reflects the hysteria that seized Obamaville on hearing that Gov. Bob McDonnell had declared Confederate History Month in the Old Dominion. Virginia leads the nation in Civil War battlefields.

So loud was the howling that in 24 hours McDonnell had backpedaled and issued an apology that he had not mentioned slavery.

Unfortunately, the governor missed a teaching moment — at the outset of the 150th anniversary of America's bloodiest war.

Slavery was indeed evil, but it existed in the Americas a century before the oldest of our founding fathers was even born. Five of our first seven presidents were slaveholders.

But Virginia did not secede in defense of slavery. Indeed, when Abraham Lincoln was inaugurated, March 4, 1861, Virginia was still in the Union. Only South Carolina, Georgia and the five Gulf states had seceded and created the Confederate States of America.

At the firing on Fort Sumter, April 12-13, 1865, the first shots of the Civil War, Virginia was still inside the Union. Indeed, there were more slave states in the Union than in the Confederacy. But, on April 15, Lincoln issued a call for 75,000 volunteers from the state militias to march south and crush the new Confederacy.

Two days later, April 17, Virginia seceded rather than provide soldiers or militia to participate in a war on their brethren. North Carolina, Tennessee and Arkansas followed Virginia out over the same issue. They would not be a party to a war on their kinfolk.

Slavery was not the cause of this war. Secession was — that and Lincoln's determination to drown the nation in blood if necessary to make the Union whole again.

Nor did Lincoln ever deny it.

In his first inaugural, Lincoln sought to appease the states that had seceded by endorsing a constitutional amendment to make slavery permanent in the 15 states where it then existed. He even offered to help the Southern states run down fugitive slaves.

In 1862, Lincoln wrote Horace Greeley that if he could restore the Union without freeing one slave he would do it. The Emancipation Proclamation of Jan.

1, 1863, freed only those slaves Lincoln had no power to free — those still under Confederate rule. As for slaves in the Union states of Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky and Missouri, they remained the property of their owners.

As for "terrorists," no army fought more honorably than Robert E. Lee's Army of Northern Virginia. Few deny that.

The great terrorist in that war was William Tecumseh Sherman, who violated all the known rules of war by looting, burning and pillaging on his infamous March to the Sea from Atlanta to Savannah. Sherman would later be given command of the war against the Plains Indians and advocate extermination of the Sioux.

"The only good Indian is a dead Indian" is attributed both to Sherman and Gen. Phil Sheridan, who burned the Shenandoah and carried out Sherman's ruthless policy against the Indians. Both have statues and circles named for them in Washington, D.C.

If Martin thinks Sherman a hero, he might study what happened to the slave women of Columbia, S.C., when "Uncle Billy's" boys in blue arrived to burn the city.

What of the Sons of Confederate Veterans, at whose request McDonnell issued his proclamation? What racist deeds have they perpetrated of late?

They tend the graves of Confederate dead and place flags on Memorial Day. They contributed to the restoration of the home of Jefferson Davis, damaged by Hurricane Katrina. They publish the Confederate Veteran, a magazine that relates stories of the ancestors they love to remember. They join environmentalists in fighting to preserve Civil War battlefields. They do re-enactments of Civil War battles with men and boys whose ancestors fought for the Union. And they defend the monuments to their ancestors and the flag under which they fought.

Why are they vilified?

Because they are Southern white Christian men — none of whom defends slavery, but all of whom are defiantly proud of the South, its ancient faith and their forefathers who fell in the Lost Cause.

Undeniably, the Civil War ended in the abolition of slavery and restoration of the Union. But the Southern states believed they had the same right to rid themselves of a government to which they no longer felt allegiance as did Washington, Jefferson and Madison, all slave-owners, who could no longer give loyalty to the king of England.

Consider closely this latest skirmish in a culture war that may yet make an end to any idea of nationhood, and you will see whence the real hate is coming. It is not from Gov. McDonnell or the Sons of Confederate Veterans.

Patrick Buchanan is the author of the book "Churchill, Hitler and 'The Unnecessary War." To find out more about Patrick Buchanan, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

5 Comments | Post Comment
An excellent, historically-accurate commentary. As a fellow author and historian, I continue to be dismayed at the active denial or lack of curiosity about our own documented history by the average American. This nearly universal characteristic of the modern American, coupled with their unwillingness to do the hard work of reflective thinking has made them the sheeple they are. We aren't alone in this in the world but we certainly have less excuse for it than most.
From a grateful Southron
Comment: #1
Posted by: R. Stephen Dorsey
Fri Apr 9, 2010 8:07 AM
This is why I hang in with you Buchanan. I love your history lessons. You are basically right. I wonder though: Why is Mc Donnell is so defensive on his exclusion of slavery. Nothing is black and white, pun intended, Patrick.
Comment: #2
Posted by: alf1052
Fri Apr 9, 2010 12:26 PM
While the proximate cause of the Civil War was succession, the root was whether the federal government had the legal authority to end slavery. In any case, Pat is wrong about the SCV. Over the past few years, they been co-opted -- after a fierce internal fight -- by outspoken white supremacists. The fact is that the Republicans have been kissing white racist butt since the Nixon days in order to cultivate the vote that left after the Democrats passed civil rights legislation. This ridiculous "proclamation" -- done at the request of an openly racist group -- is just another example of that pandering.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Geoffrey James
Fri Apr 9, 2010 1:44 PM
I believe the editorial is basically historically correct and am glad someone can discuss things on the basis of facts versus myth.
People forget that the North invaded the South, not the other way around.
Now I remember why I used to enjoy the editorial writing in the St. Louis Globe Democrat.
Comment: #4
Posted by: John Price
Sat Apr 10, 2010 9:04 AM
I understand what Pat Buchanan is trying to say but when the Governor of Virginia releases such a statement, he ignores the large African American population in Virginia, and their sensitives and sentiments to such a declaration. They are, after all, descendants of the slaves and, cannot be expected to celebrate such a day. It's divisive and wrong. I admire the last two Governors for not bringing up this issue and it's a shame that Gov McDonnell chose to do so.
Moreover, as an American who does not live in the South, I am extremely offended at the notion of celebrating the Confederate soldiers or any of those states for any reason. They succeeded from the Union in an act of treason against the United States. It is absurd and extremely offensive that any Governor, descendant or not, would want to celebrate such awful part of our history. It's a slap in the face of Abraham Lincoln, General US Grant and many others that fought to preserve the Union.
Lastly, no matter how you much lipstick to put on the pig, it's still a pig. "Southern white Christian men", as Buchanan calls them, are celebrating a people who enslaved a race and wanted to preserve it against the better interests of our country . And while our Constitution does allow for the freedom of speech including the "Sons of Confederate Veterans" or the "Communist Party" or the "Nazi Party", no public official should take on the views of the extreme fringe on behalf of the entire population, put that in an official Government document, and ask the entire state to celebrate such a day. In very simple words, the Governor is celebrating the racist behavior of many people's Southern forefathers.
And finally I leave you with these quotes from Abraham Lincoln:
" Every advocate of slavery naturally desires to see blasted, and crushed, the liberty promised the black man by the new constitution." --November 14, 1864 Letter to Stephen A. Hurlbut
"One eighth of the whole population were colored slaves, not distributed generally over the Union, but localized in the Southern part of it. These slaves constituted a peculiar and powerful interest. All knew that this interest was, somehow, the cause of the war." --March 4, 1865 Inaugural Address
Comment: #5
Posted by: Hasan
Mon Apr 12, 2010 6:38 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Pat Buchanan
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

9 Jul 2010 Is Democracy Overrated?

1 Nov 2011 The Coming Church-State Wars

13 Feb 2007 Does Putin Not Have a Point?