creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Patrick Buchanan
Pat Buchanan
14 Feb 2012
On to Tehran -- or Is It Damascus?

Our War Party has been temporarily diverted from its clamor for war on Iran by the insurrection against the … Read More.

10 Feb 2012
Obama's Trampling on God's Turf Now

Yes, Virginia, there is a religious war going on. It is for the soul of America. And traditional Christianity … Read More.

7 Feb 2012
Who Wants War With Iran?

Appearing alongside CIA Director David Petraeus before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence last week, … Read More.

The Neocons' Palin Project

Share Comment

Will the neocons who tutored George W. Bush in the ideology he pursued to the ruin of his presidency do the same for Sarah Palin?

Should they succeed, they will destroy her. Yet, they are moving even now to capture this princess of the right and hope of the party.

In St. Paul, Palin was told to cancel a meeting with Phyllis Schlafly and pro-life conservatives. McCain's operatives said Palin had to rest for her Wednesday convention speech.

Yet, on Tuesday, Palin was behind closed doors with Joe Lieberman and officials of the Israeli lobby AIPAC. There, according to The Washington Post, Palin took and passed her oral exams.

"Palin assured the group of her strong support for Israel, of her desire to see the United States move its embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem and of her opposition to Iran's aspirations to become a nuclear power, according to sources familiar with the meeting."

AIPAC's mission, like that of Likud, is to goad America into launching air and missile strikes on any and all Iranian nuclear facilities.

AIPAC went away happy. Purred spokesman Josh Block, "We were pleased that Gov. Palin expressed her deep personal commitment to the safety and well-being of Israel."

Heading home to Alaska to prepare for her interview with Charlie Gibson, Palin was escorted by Randy Scheunemann, McCain's foreign policy guru and, until March, a hired agent of the Tbilisi regime.

Scheunemann's lobbying assignment: Bring Georgia into NATO, so U.S. troops, like 19-year-old Track Palin, will be required to fight Russia to defend a Saakashvili regime that has paid Randy and his partner $730,000.

Reportedly, a phone conversation was held between Saakashvili and Palin, in which Palin committed herself to the territorial integrity of Georgia, though South Ossetia and Abkhazia have declared independence and been recognized by Moscow, which now has troops in both.

Also on Palin's plane was Steve Biegun, formerly of Bush's National Security Council, and Scheunemann's choice to tutor her. Of Biegun, Steven Clemens of the New American Foundation says, "He will turn her into an advocate of Cheneyism and Cheney's view of national security issues."

During her interview with Gibson, Palin often took a neocon line. Three times she said that, should Israel decide to attack Iran, the United States should not "second guess" Israel's decision or interfere.

This contradicts U.S. policy. Adm. Michael Mullen, chairman of the joint chiefs, has warned Israel not to attack Iran, as the United States does not want a "third front." And the Pentagon is withholding crucial weapons the Israelis want and need to carry out any such attack.

Palin also volunteered that the Russian invasion was "unprovoked," though Georgia attacked South Ossetia first.

She followed up by saying that Georgia and Ukraine should be brought into NATO.

Would that mean America would have to go to war with Russia on behalf of Georgia in any new conflict, asked Gibson.

"Perhaps so," said Palin.

Scheunemann should get a fat severance check from Saakashvili for that one.

One ex-White House aide at American Enterprise Institute, asked by Tim Shipman of the Daily Telegraph if AEI sees Palin as a "project," replied: "Your word, not mine. ... But I wouldn't disagree with the sentiment. ... She's bright, and she's a blank page. She's going places, and it's worth going there with her."

In fairness to Palin, on issues like NATO membership for Ukraine and Georgia, her answers reflect the views of the man who chose her. She has no option at present but to follow the line laid down by Scheunemann.

But make no mistake. Sarah Palin is no neocon. She did not come by her beliefs by studying Leo Strauss. She is a traditionalist whose values are those of family, faith, community and country, not some utopian ideology.

Wasilla, Alaska, is not a natural habitat of neoconservatives.

And her unrehearsed answers to Gibson's questions reveal her natural conservatism. Asked if she agrees with the Bush Doctrine, Palin asked for clarification. "In what respect, Charlie?"

Gibson: "Do we have the right of an anticipatory self-defense?"

Yes, said Palin, "if there is legitimate and enough intelligence that tells us that a strike is imminent against (the) American people, we have every right to defend our country. In fact, the president has the obligation, the duty to defend."

Exactly. The intelligence must be legit and the threat "imminent."

Interviewed by Alaska Business Monthly in March 2007 on the surge, Palin said, "I heard on the news about the new deployments, and while I support our president, I want to know that we have an exit plan in place."

That is not the language of empire or "benevolent global hegemony."

Palin may disappoint many conservatives in the next seven weeks by having to parrot the McCain-neocon line on NATO expansion, NAFTA and a "path to citizenship" for illegal aliens. But the battle for Sarah's soul is not over.

For, again, the lady is no neocon. Nor is the husband Todd, First Dude of Alaska and former member of the "Alaska First" Independence Party.

To find out more about Patrick Buchanan, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

8 Comments | Post Comment
I wish EVERYONE would just let Sarah be Sarah.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Marian
Tue Sep 16, 2008 4:42 AM
Sir; Mrs. Palin is a nut, or an idiot, or both; but that does not mean she can't be taught tricks like a horse or a dog. She is ready to step into the presidency? There is a man in panties for you !... Sure, let's get drunk and drive off a cliff. Go for it! Where is the president who was not aged twenty years in an eight year run? If she were really a woman, it is safe to say she would be more careful of her age, and not want it written all over her face. No! There is something rotten upstairs with that one. She cares more for power than for making sense. She is way too easy about sending her children, and other peoples children into harms way for no possible gain. She talks about war like she never had to clean rotten meat out of a broken freezer. I swear; if our democracy can put that one into office it is because the inmates have taken over the asylum... Thanks... Sweeney
Comment: #2
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Tue Sep 16, 2008 4:49 AM
In other words, say whatever it takes to get elected then once in office pursue your own personal agenda. Just the kind of candidate we need. A blank page, great. And what makes anyone think she will be any more successful than Colin Powell was (hardly a blank page) in resisiting the neocons? I'm (mainly) a democrat and a liberal yet I often find myself agreeing with Pat on some issues. But when it comes to Palin he's just another Kool-aid drinker.
Comment: #3
Posted by: garlis99
Tue Sep 16, 2008 5:28 AM
Joe Lieberman will have more influence in the McCain White House than Sarah Palin will....

But, I thank you for this information....because now I realize that Sarah Palin is the least of my worries when it comes to a McCain Presidency...

I was concerned about the fact that every place McCain showed up their was Lieberman and Graham hovering in the background and now I know who was behind those two. Neo Cons who's agenda will destroy the United States.

Enough is enough....

Pat, is abortion that important of an issue to you that you are willing to crawl in bed with the neo cons?



Comment: #4
Posted by: Carl
Tue Sep 16, 2008 5:29 AM
Re: Marian; Sir, well Ya. The longer you look at her the uglier she gets. But she has been in more molds than jello. Every one has had some input into her character. So, who is the real Mrs. Palin? You're looking at her, five feet somthin and a photon deep. There is no depth to her character. Some one should ask how she feels about sending her baby to war. Some one should ask how she feels about her retarded child. Some one should ask her how she feels about wide spread poverty in America.... She is who she is because she knows what she wants, but she does not have any feelings. She is incapable of pain, of grief, of sadness, of regret, or shame. She is probably incapable of great joy, and profound happiness. But who am I to judge? We all must be a lttle bit numb to our emotions to endure the break down of America. It is only that some mourn it, and others celebrate it.
Comment: #5
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Tue Sep 16, 2008 7:09 AM
Re: garlis99; Sir; she is not a blank slate. She is Pat Robertson in panties, and the same sort of nonsense he spews exits her mouth without the scrutiny of a brain. You better worry about ideologues getting their hands on our military. She is a true believer. The only differences between her and the terrorists is the religion and the fact that she on our side. Not. The republican party needs to hunt her down with a butterfly net and put her some place soft.... Thanks..Sweeney
Comment: #6
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Tue Sep 16, 2008 7:16 AM
Sweeney.... "Pat Robertson in panties..."

That is truly a classic....a true one liner that leaves a unshakeable vision...

I love that line....
Comment: #7
Posted by: Carl
Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:08 AM
Re: Carl; Sir...Toooo bad it's tarue. If we get to WWIII it will because one of that kind is looking for the last days with a bible in one hand and a nuclear trigger in the other. I think it is time for a law: No more idiots or nut heads in the white house. Period. We will be generations cleaning up and paying off the last mess. Who needs another?...Best, and thanks....Sweeney.
Comment: #8
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Tue Sep 16, 2008 1:23 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Pat Buchanan
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Jim Hightower
Jim HightowerUpdated 15 Feb 2012

13 Feb 2007 Does Putin Not Have a Point?

23 Sep 2008 An Amnesty for Stupidity

15 Jul 2008 A Phony Crisis -- and a Real One