creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Patrick Buchanan
Pat Buchanan
25 May 2012
The Unraveling Myth of Watergate

It was, they said, the crime of the century. An attempted coup d'etat by Richard Nixon, stopped by two … Read More.

22 May 2012
What If Zimmerman Walks Free?

Three months ago, George Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer in Sanford, Fla., shot and killed Trayvon Martin. Handcuffed,… Read More.

18 May 2012
Has the Bell Begun to Toll for the GOP?

Among the more controversial chapters in "Suicide of a Superpower," my book published last fall, … Read More.

The Message of Tokyo's Kowtow

Share Comment

Hubris will do it ever time.

The Chinese have just made a serious strategic blunder.

They dropped the mask and showed their scowling face to Asia, exposing how the Middle Kingdom intends to deal with smaller powers, now that she is the largest military and economic force in Asia and second largest on earth.

A fortnight ago, a Chinese trawler rammed a Japanese patrol boat in the Senkaku Islands administered by Japan but also claimed by China. Tokyo released the ship and crew, but held the captain.

His immediate return was demanded by Beijing.

Japan refused. China instantly escalated the minor incident into a major confrontation, threatening a cut off of Japan's supply of "rare-earth" materials, essential to the production of missiles, batteries and computers.

Through predatory trading, China had killed its U.S. competitor in rare-earth materials, establishing almost a global monopoly.

The world depends on China.

Japan capitulated and released the captain.

Now Beijing has decided to rub Japan's nose in her humiliation by demanding a full apology and compensation.

Suddenly, the world sees, no longer as through a glass darkly, the China that has emerged from a quarter century of American indulgence, patronage and tutelage since Tiananmen Square.

The Chinese tiger is all grown up, and it's not cuddly anymore.

And with Beijing's threat to use its monopoly of rare-earth materials to bend nations to its will, how does the Milton Friedmanite free-trade ideology of the Republican Party, which fed Beijing $2 trillion in trade surpluses at America's expense over two decades, look now?

How do all those lockstep Republican votes for Most Favored Nation status for Beijing, ushering her into the World Trade Organization and looking the other way as China dumped into our markets, thieved our technology and carted off our factories look today?

The self-sufficient republic that could stand alone in the world is more dependent than Japan on China for rare-earth elements vital to our industries, for the necessities of our daily life, and for the loans to finance our massive trade and budget deficits.

How does the interdependence of nations in a global economy look now, compared to the independence American patriots from Alexander Hamilton to Calvin Coolidge guaranteed to us, that enabled us to win World War II in Europe and the Pacific in less than four years?

Yet China's bullying of Japan is beneficial, for it may wake us up to the world as it is, as it has been, and ever shall be.

Consider.

China now claims all the Paracel and Spratly islands in the South China Sea, though Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia, the Philippines, Taiwan and Brunei border that sea. To reinforce her claim, a Chinese fighter jet crashed a U.S EP-3 surveillance plane 80 miles off Hainan Island in 2001. Not until Secretary of State Colin Powell apologized twice did China agree to release the American crew.

China's claim to the Senkakus (the Diaoyu Islands to the Chinese) was emphasized last week. While these are largely volcanic rocks rather than habitable islands, ownership would give a nation a powerful claim to all the oil, gas and minerals in the East China Sea.

China has repeatedly warned the United States to keep its warships, especially carriers, out of the 100-mile-wide Taiwan Strait. On the mainland opposite, Beijing has planted 1,000 missiles to convince Taipei of the futility and cost of declaring independence.

When the U.S. Navy launched exercises with South Korea after the sinking of South Korea's warship Cheonan by the North, China threatened the United States should it move the 97,000-ton carrier George Washington into the Yellow Sea between Korea and China. The carrier stayed out of the Yellow Sea and remained east of the Korean Peninsula.

In addition to her claims to sovereignty over all the seas off her southern and eastern coasts, China occupies a large tract of Indian land in the Aksai Chin area of India's northwest. Thousands of square miles were seized by Beijing in the 1962 war with New Delhi — and annexed.

In 1969, China and the Soviet Union battled on the Amur and Ussuri rivers over lands Czar Alexander I seized at the end of that bloodiest war of the 19th century, the Chinese civil war known as the Taiping Rebellion. Leonid Brezhnev reportedly sounded out the Nixon White House on U.S. reaction to Soviet use of atomic weapons to effect the nuclear castration of Mao's China.

China's claims to her lost lands in Siberia and the Russian Far East have not been forgotten in Beijing, and remain on Chinese maps.

How should America respond?

As none of these territorial disputes involves our vital interests, we should stay out and let free Asia get a good close look at the new China. Then explore the depths of our own dependency on this bellicose Beijing and determine how to restore our economic independence.

Ending the trade deficit with China now becomes a matter of national security.

Patrick Buchanan is the author of the book "Churchill, Hitler and 'The Unnecessary War." To find out more about Patrick Buchanan, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
Why pay attention to China when the war party wants a war with Iran? Could it be that the war party's corporate masters have too many business interests in China to want to mess with China? Mr. Buchanan is correct. It is time to wake up.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Mark
Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:40 AM
Amen brother! Wish you had been in the foreign policy decisions of W. and Obama. We wouldn't have gotten involved in Iraq, would be out of Afghanistan by now, and we wouldn't have been kowtowing to China! Bring on the trade war...they already put a protective tariff on our chickens. Lets return the favor by slapping a 50% tarriff on their goods the same they did to us. And lets penalize so called American companies that have threatened our security by offshoring all our manufacturing by raising their corporate taxes as well!
Comment: #2
Posted by: craig
Mon Sep 27, 2010 12:42 PM
But the US trade deficit is already disappearing.

America has only had trade surpluses when it is in the worst situation of recessions and crises.

And right now, its trade deficit is falling below $400 billion, when it was more than $700 billion a few months ago.

I don't think Mr. Buchanan understands that high trade deficits are actually the sign of larger, stronger, richer, and less dependent nations. Britain and Australia run huge trade deficits, because their productivity and earnings are so high that they can consume far more from abroad by giving as little away from their country to outsiders. That's because they have a huge backlog of savings and capital, including what comes from abroad, while China gets less investment from abroad than Australia does. You can't eat, drink, wear, drive, or use what you export.

The Tsar of Russia once said, "Let us starve, so we can export." The export strategy was meant to make the Tsar and his establishment richer, and to make Russians leaner and weaker, just the way it happens in China. When you devalue currency, inflate regional currency to no end, block outsiders from selling, you force locals to work more for less and you help make the government much richer, without fear of capital flight to abroad. And that's why export taxes are high and why exports are the main source of making governments richer and their officials put in cushy civil service jobs in the poor world. Export-orientation is an upward redistribution of wealth. Rather, nationalism itself is an upward redistribution of wealth to the government and ensuring its power is not threatened.

And why even well-intentioned American nationalists want to bring such cronyist power to their governments, like Third World countries do, is beyond me.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Prateek Sanjay
Tue Sep 28, 2010 2:29 AM
Prateek,

I think you misinterpret the economic situation you are looking at. Our trade deficit is diminishing because we are broke. The United States has a negative savings rate and a shrinking real wage. You make comparison to Britain and Australia however, both countries are highly indebted and have inflationary economic policies. This elementary comparison is like saying that watching too much television in place of reading is okay for your family because all other families watch too much television when we know that watching television in place of reading is bad for you. True American citizens want the best for their fellow man. We want to educate the masses, enable them to understand that the corporate and political elite are not working in their best interests. Not one single job should be outsourced or taken by someone on a H1B visa if there is an American citizen willing and able to do said job. In my honest opinion we should be importing very few finished goods as we are more than capable of producing them domestically. I also think you need to compare those cushy civil servant jobs to the more illustrious corporate jobs that are heavily subsidized by our government. Corporate America is given golden gooses through forced gambling (401k, IRA), subsidies, below market rate labor (H1B visa employees) and a plethora of other goodies that simple campaign contributions can bring. If you would like to take a look at income redistribution have a peak at what has happened to the income gap in the U.S. in the past 30 years.

DGM
Comment: #4
Posted by: DougMagic
Tue Sep 28, 2010 5:12 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Pat Buchanan
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

13 Apr 2010 Katyn and 'The Good War'

8 Jun 2010 Misdemeanors -- or Crimes?

7 Aug 2009 A GOP That Can Say No