creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Patrick Buchanan
Pat Buchanan
14 Feb 2012
On to Tehran -- or Is It Damascus?

Our War Party has been temporarily diverted from its clamor for war on Iran by the insurrection against the … Read More.

10 Feb 2012
Obama's Trampling on God's Turf Now

Yes, Virginia, there is a religious war going on. It is for the soul of America. And traditional Christianity … Read More.

7 Feb 2012
Who Wants War With Iran?

Appearing alongside CIA Director David Petraeus before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence last week, … Read More.

The Hillary Democrats

Share Comment

"I have a much broader base to build a winning coalition on" than Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton has told USA TODAY.

She cited an Associated Press article "that found how Sen. Obama's support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans, is weakening again, and how whites in both states who had not completed college were supporting me."

"There's a pattern emerging here," said Hillary. "These are the people you have to win if you're a Democrat in sufficient numbers to actually win the election. Everybody knows that."

The Democratic Party can't win with just "eggheads and African-Americans," Paul Begala added helpfully.

What Hillary and Begala are saying is politically incorrect, but it is also patently true. Hillary was describing what may now fairly be called the Hillary Democrats — a.k.a. the ex-Reagan Democrats who did not vote for Obama and may defect to John McCain.

If Obama can win over these voters who gave Hillary big victories in Ohio and Pennsylvania, he is the 44th president. If McCain does not win a goodly slice of these Democrats, he will lose.

Who, exactly, are the Hillocrats, half of whom said in the exit polls from North Carolina and Indiana that, if she loses the nomination, they will stay home or vote for McCain?

They are white, working- and middle-class, Catholic, small-town, rural, unionized, middle-age and seniors, and surviving on less than $50,000 a year. They are the people most belittled by the condescending commentary of Barack behind closed doors out at Sodom on the Bay.

"You go into some of these small towns in Pennsylvania, (where) the jobs have been gone now for 25 years. ... And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."

In 40 years, two Democrats have won the presidency, Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton, and both did so only after connecting with these folks.

People forget. In 1976, Carter ran as a Naval Academy grad and nuclear engineer, a born-again Baptist and peanut farmer from Plains, Ga., who, in Philadelphia, talked about preserving the "ethnic purity" of the neighborhoods. Clinton first ran as a death-penalty Democrat.

It was Ronald Reagan who cemented the GOP hold of these Nixon-Agnew New Majority Democrats, who are now headed back home.

And it was George H.W.

Bush and Lee Atwater who turned a 17-point deficit as of Aug. 1, 1988, into an eight-point lead Bush never lost on Labor Day — by eviscerating Michael Dukakis on the social and cultural issues: Dukakis' veto of a Pledge-of-Allegiance-to-the-Flag bill, his opposition to capital punishment, his pride in being "a card-carrying member of the ACLU," his weekend furloughs for convicted criminals and killers like Willy Horton.

Bush lost the presidency in 1992 when, under fire, he retreated from the social and cultural issues and sought to win on foreign policy, and on the economy, where his approval rating was 16 percent.

In 1992, cultural, social and moral issues could have derailed Clinton, which is why James Carville told the War Room to stay laser-focused. "It's the economy, stupid!" Bush and James Baker deemed social and cultural issues unworthy of a president. And so it was that George H.W. Bush ceased to be president.

His son did not make that mistake. In the primaries and general election in 2000, Bush embraced the Christian conservatives and their agenda.

Since Pennsylvania, Barack has recognized this deficiency and sought to portray himself as a reflexive patriot who enjoys a bottle of Bud just like the next guy, a kid raised in poverty by a single mom, who turned his back on Wall Street offers to fight for steelworkers laid off when their mills closed in South Chicago and moved to China.

McCain, a war hero and POW, is a natural for Middle Pennsylvania and Middle Ohio. His problems, however, are these:

He is failing to energize the Republican base, one-fourth of which is still voting against him in primaries. On the great populist issues of 2008 — outsourcing of American jobs to Mexico, Asia and China, and the illegal alien invasion — he stands foursquare with K Street — for amnesty and NAFTA — and against Main Street.

And like Gerald Ford and Bob Dole, McCain recoils from cultural and social issues. He berated Tarheel Republicans for linking Barack, the Rev. Wright and local Democrats, and denounced a conservative talk show host who introduced him for mocking Barack's middle name.

This may solidify McCain's standing with his core constituency, the liberal commentariat. But these folks will depart in the fall. And the Republican base and the Hillary Democrats had better be there, or McCain will do what moderate Republicans nominees do best. Lose gracefully.

Keep an eye on West Virginia. The votes Hillary gets, and the way she gets them, may provide a road map for how the GOP can hold the White House this fall, if they are not too squeamish to follow it.

To find out more about Patrick Buchanan, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
As usual, Patrick Buchanan's analysis is spot on. As a lifelong Democrat and a die-hard Senator Clinton supporter, I thought hell would freeze over before I could vote for a Republican. Well, grab your coats because it's about to get real cold! I promise that if Hillary Clinton is not the Democratic nominee, I will vote (and possibly campaign) for Senator John McCain. I am not a racist (as Obamabots like to claim) and I am neither white, working class, Hispanic, or uneducated. I do not fit into the neat box that the media has classified as Hillary supporters. I'm a highly educated, highly compensated, Asian American female that is angry about the extreme left wing's destruction of the Democratic party I once loved so fervently. The best way to describe "Hillocrats" are as Moderates. There is definitely a deep divide between the Democratic party between the McGovern losers on the left and the Clinton legacy in the center. The majority in this great country are moderates - not left wing liberals or right wing conservatives. What Senator Obama and his supporters don't understand is that Clinton supporters are really angry and we WILL vote for John McCain because he is experienced, qualified, patriotic, decent, and a moderate. We (the Democratic Center) will NEVER vote for Obama because he lacks not only the experience to be president, but also the judgment and character. We will not vote for someone with such despicable associations to racists and terrorists. We will never forgive him for playing the race card and accusing the Clintons (who have spent a lifetime fighting for civil rights) of being racists. If the Republican Party and John McCain want to win this November, they need to move their party to the center. They can win our votes. Just show Senator Clinton and her supporters the respect that Obama, the Democratic Elite and the misogynistic Obama press core never showed to us.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Mia
Fri May 9, 2008 8:16 PM
Mr. Buchanan has once again taken a grain of truth and made a mountain of it. The truth is that there are a large block of "reagan democrats" that vote based on their misguided reading of values in candidates. But that is NOT a good thing to be encouraged-in fact, that mind set has produced 4 terrible presidents--( Nixon, Carter, Clinton and George W) and caused this country to follow a Neo-Con philiosophy set into terrible policies that have wreaked havoc on our image, our economy and our future as a country. For both John McCain and Barack Obama to eschew the Lee Atwater/Karl Rove politics of personal destruction approach and choose instead to present the country with policy and philosophical differences as men and candidates who are Americans first and Partisans to their party second is refreshing and what this country needs to move forward. And if the Reagan Democrats or Conservative Republicans continue to attempt to use the Republican Right's destructive play book, they will join the KKK, Nazi Party and the Communist party in the ash bin of history as just another set of hate groups bent on making America fall to it's worst attributes rather than rising to it's better self.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Bruce Stone
Sun May 11, 2008 5:11 AM
Mia, your post on Patrick Buchanan's analysis was right on. I do not fit into the mold of being a senior citizen, but I have family whom live in Ohio and support their view of Hillary Clinton in that she has more experience and better judgment to be President compared to Barack Obama. The fact that Barack Obama had the BAD JUDGMENT to continue attending a black-centric, divisive, racist, and hate-mongering toward whites church for TWENTY YEARS while submitting his wife and children to the same message shows the kind of bad jugement Hillocrats (or Reagan Democrats) fear. As much as I dislike John McCain and his support for Iraq, I am willing to support him and vote him if Barack Obama in fact wins the Democratic nomination without having a re-vote in Michigan and counting the Florida votes. The fact that Super Delegates are willing to engage in backroom deals to give Barack Obama this nomination by disenfranching to the voters from both Michigan and Ohio is enough for me to vote for Senator John McCain. The Super Delegates, Democratic leadership, and Howard Dean should be very worried about this fact and those Super Delegates whom support Barack Obama while their constituency supports Hillary Clinton should be fearful as well. Hillary Democrats are angry and very well may vote against them the next time they are up for reelection by blatantly ignoring their constituency.
Comment: #3
Posted by: InSearchOfTruth
Sun May 11, 2008 10:09 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Pat Buchanan
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 15 Feb 2012

24 Aug 2007 We Did It to Ourselves

28 Sep 2010 The Message of Tokyo's Kowtow

24 Apr 2009 The Rooted and the Rootless