creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Patrick Buchanan
Pat Buchanan
25 May 2012
The Unraveling Myth of Watergate

It was, they said, the crime of the century. An attempted coup d'etat by Richard Nixon, stopped by two … Read More.

22 May 2012
What If Zimmerman Walks Free?

Three months ago, George Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer in Sanford, Fla., shot and killed Trayvon Martin. Handcuffed,… Read More.

18 May 2012
Has the Bell Begun to Toll for the GOP?

Among the more controversial chapters in "Suicide of a Superpower," my book published last fall, … Read More.

The Bonfire of the Qurans

Share Comment

Is there anyone who has not weighed in on the Saturday night, Sept. 11, bonfire of the Qurans at the Rev. Terry Jones' Dove World Outreach Center in Gainesville, Fla.?

Gen. David Petraeus warns the Quran burnings could inflame the Muslim world and imperil U.S. troops in Afghanistan. Hillary Clinton declares it "disgraceful." Sarah Palin calls it a "provocation." President Obama calls it "a recruitment bonanza for al-Qaida. You could have serious violence in ... Pakistan and Afghanistan," and Muslims could be inspired "to blow themselves up."

The State Department has put U.S. embassies on alert in the near 50 countries where Muslims are a majority. The Vatican calls the bonfire "an outrageous and grave gesture. ... No one burns the Quran."

Mayor Michael Bloomberg, the defender of the ground zero mosque, is consistent. Burning Islam's most sacred book is "distasteful," he says, but the "First Amendment protects everybody."

Everybody frets and wrings their hands. No one acts.

Yet if, as President Obama and his commanding general both say, the torching of hundreds of Qurans could so enrage the Islamic world as to incite terror-bombings against U.S. troops and imperial our war effort, why does not the commander in chief send U.S. marshals to arrest this provocateur and abort his provocation?

For Jones, who sells t-shirts saying "Islam is of the Devil," may be an Islamophobe, but he is also a serious man, willing to live with the consequences of his deeds, even if he causes U.S. war casualties.

The questions raised by his deliberate provocation are not so much about him, then, as they are about us.

Are we a serious nation? Is Obama up to being a war president?

Constantly, we hear praise of Lincoln, Wilson and FDR as war leaders.

Yet President Lincoln arrested thousands of citizens and locked them up as security risks, while denying them habeas corpus. He shut newspapers and sent troops to block Maryland's elections, fearing Confederate sympathizers would win and take Maryland out of the Union.

President Wilson shut down antiwar newspapers, prosecuted editors, and put Socialist presidential candidate and war opponent Eugene Debs in prison, leaving him to rot until Warren Harding released him and invited the dangerous man over to the White House for dinner.

California Gov. Earl Warren and FDR collaborated to put 110,000 Japanese, 75,000 of them U.S.

citizens, into detention camps for the duration of the war and ordered the Department of Justice to prosecute antiwar conservatives.

During Korea, Harry Truman seized the steel mills when a threatened strike potentially imperiled production of war munitions. Richard Nixon went to court to block publication of the Pentagon papers until the Supreme Court decided publication could go forward.

This is not written to defend those war measures or those wars. It is to say that if a president takes a nation to war, and commits men to their deaths, as Obama did in doubling the number of U.S. troops in Afghanistan, he should be prepared to do what is within his power to protect those troops.

And if Petraeus says letting Jones set this bonfire could imperil U.S. troops, Obama should act to stop it. And if he is so paralyzed by uncertainty as to whether he can do anything — and, as a result, soldiers die — what would that tell us about their commander in chief?

Would stopping Jones and confiscating the Qurans violate Jones' First Amendment rights? Perhaps. And perhaps not. But if Eric Holder cannot find a charge against Jones, or an inherent power of a war president to prevent actions imminently damaging to the war effort, Obama should find some Justice Department attorneys who can.

Let the ACLU make the case that interfering with Jones' bonfire violates his First Amendment rights. Let a U.S. court decide whether Obama has the power to take a decision previous wartime presidents would have taken without hesitation.

And if Obama does not have the power to stop actions like this, imperiling our troops, then we should get out of this war.

This episode reveals the gulf between us and the Islamic world. Despite all our talk of universal values, tens of millions of Muslims, in countries not only hostile but friendly, believe that a sacrilege against their faith, like the burning of the Quran by a single American oddball, justifies the killing of Americans. What kind of compatibility can there be between us?

What do we have in common with people who believe that evangelism by other faiths in their societies merits the death penalty, as do conversions to Christianity, while promiscuity and adultery justify stonings, lashings and beheadings.

And what does it say about our ability to fight and win a "long war" in the Islamic world if our war effort can be crippled by a solitary pastor with 50 families in his church who decides to have a book burning?

Action creates consensus, Mr. President. People follow when a leader leads.

Patrick Buchanan is the author of the book "Churchill, Hitler and 'The Unnecessary War." To find out more about Patrick Buchanan, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

5 Comments | Post Comment
In this case the constitution is more important. As far as I know we are not involved in any declared wars, just wars of choice started by one president and continued by another.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Elwood Anderson
Thu Sep 9, 2010 3:24 PM
Although this article is vast and addresses many topics, the overlaying theme (someone should stop Rev. Terry Jones from a potential threat to U.S. troops), seems to be appropriate. Pat Buchanan also makes a good point by giving this responsibility to the President of the United States, "he should be prepared to do what is within his power to protect those troops."(Pat Buchanan) He also addresses many other issues although he leaves them up to the reader to answer such as: view of the president's power, perspective of Islam's view, and view of relationship with Islam.
When Pat alludes to Lincoln, Wilson, and FDR, it is a big mistake. The U.S. has a President that at the moment is very unpopular. Pat supports radical action on President Obama's part, and hints at more "President Lincoln arrested 1000's...denying them habeas corpus"..."Wilson shut down antiwar newspapers." Pat even justifies the detainment camps of Japanese during World War II. This is the last thing the American people want, more power for the Federal Government.
The Islamic People are going overboard, burning U.S. flags and other actions over an issue that so far is non-existent. If there was a massive calling to burn the Torah, no Jews would be seen rioting in such a way. He does make the same generalization about the Islamic people as they do about us. "What Kind of compatibility can there be between us?"(Pat Buchanan) Many Islamic people have rioted and cursed but more have not; and because of those who are rioting people are labeling the whole of the Islamic Nation just as they are labeling Americans for what Rev. Jones has said.
So now all of the American-Islamic tensions are rising very rapidly because of a burning that has not happened. Hopefully Obama will take Pat's advise and the "people [will] follow when the leader leads."(Pat Buchanan)
Comment: #2
Posted by: Nathan Kelly
Thu Sep 9, 2010 8:37 PM
The Koran-Burning Incident was A Clever Judaic False Flag Distraction

The whole matter was a clever Jewish distraction, a false flag alarm to focus attention away from their own culpability in the ongoing social, economic and cultural destruction of the United States.

How can this be so? How can such a tiny minority exert such a profound and harmful effect on an entire nation? How can "Americans" be so gullible? Well, not all Americans, for although probably over 90% of the majority ethnoracial European Americans are that gullible, just only under 10% of all minority ethnoracial Americans are.

Are then ethnoracial minorities smarter than the majority? Yes! A resounding yes! But not necessarily because they are smarter IQ wise but because they are smarter streetwise, i.e., in the art of survival. Minorities easily see through this latest Jewish scam. After all they experience similar scams on a daily basis perpetuated on them by so-called "whites".

Not all of these "white" scams are obvious or even intentional. They are built into the "system". But there they are. European Americans need to "wise" up or wind up with only scraps from the table that their "white" ancestors set up and bountifully provided for.

Wise up all you intellectually dumbed-down, ethnically-whitewashed, socially-retarded American "whites"! You are ethnoracial European Americans! You have been denied and deprived of the right to an ethnoracial identity and to membership in an ethnoculturally sovereign ethnorace.

You were too busy playing supremacist "whites" to notice the demographic sea changes occurring all around you. Wise up before you lose your majority status through unlimited immigration. There is yet time. It is still not too late.

An Ethnoracial Amendment to the Constitution and an Addition to the Bill of Rights

The Ethnocultural Amendment

No citizen shall be denied or deprived of the right to an ethnoracial identity; no citizen shall be denied or deprived of the right to belong to an ethnoracial group; no ethnoracial group shall be denied or deprived of the right to ethnocultural sovereignty.

Luis Magno
Nuevo Mexicano
11 de septiembre 2010

Comment: #3
Posted by: Luis Magno
Fri Sep 10, 2010 5:57 PM
It appears that either no public figure recognizes the fundamental problem here or that none of them I have heard from are willing to state it. The scariest thing about all this is not that we have a fundamentalist Christian preacher threatening to burn some Korans, or even that there are fundamentalist Muslims who intend a violent response. By far the most dangerous part of all this in the long run is the fact that The U.S. Government chooses to acquiesce to religious fanatics who threaten violence to our entire country just because one of our own religious fanatics chooses to demonstrate his own freedom of religion by burning books of another religion he considers evil. We failed as a nation when we didn't firmly stand behind Denmark when they defended the right of their citizens to make cartoons of Muhammad. So now when it is our turn to be threatened we choose to further embolden these people who sincerely believe it is their religious duty to demand that we capitulate to their religious beliefs. What do we do when one of our preachers announces a revival meeting at which he intends to denounce Islam and then these same fanatics again threaten our entire country with violence if the preacher carries out his plans? What do we do when they demand that we make their religious holidays national holidays? What do we do when they demand we refrain from eating pork? The concern that a small congregation burning somebody else's holy book puts our troops at risk is a nonstarter by the way. Our troops are already at risk. Does it concern anybody for what? Is there anything more fundamental to American values than freedom of religion? Is there something more sacred for our military personnel to risk their lives for? And freedom of religion must include freedom to reject any religion which disagrees with one's own. Freedom of speech must include freedom to denounce the religion of others. And individual freedom in a Republic with a limited government must include the right to burn books so long as they are your own and you burn them on your own property. Let me suggest that America's politically correct men have their prayer rugs handy and it's women start making plans to be fitted for burqas.
Comment: #4
Posted by: wade mathias
Sat Sep 11, 2010 2:24 PM
Wade:
Few have said it better.
If we have no principles what are we fighting for?
Comment: #5
Posted by: Lee Zehrer
Sun Sep 12, 2010 10:41 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Pat Buchanan
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

25 Dec 2009 Of Christmas, War and Peace

31 Aug 2010 Can the Tea Party Deliver?

17 Apr 2009 Rendering Unto Caesar