creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Patrick Buchanan
Pat Buchanan
14 Feb 2012
On to Tehran -- or Is It Damascus?

Our War Party has been temporarily diverted from its clamor for war on Iran by the insurrection against the … Read More.

10 Feb 2012
Obama's Trampling on God's Turf Now

Yes, Virginia, there is a religious war going on. It is for the soul of America. And traditional Christianity … Read More.

7 Feb 2012
Who Wants War With Iran?

Appearing alongside CIA Director David Petraeus before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence last week, … Read More.

The Anti-Reagan

Share Comment

Despite his boldness, Barack Obama seems as fated to fail as were Woodrow Wilson and Jimmy Carter. And for the same reason: a belief in his own righteousness and moral superiority, and a belief that his ideals and his persona count mightily in the modern world.

Wilson declaimed about America's fight to "make the world safe for democracy" when in harness with the British, French, Russian, Japanese and Italian empires, all slavering to feast on the carcasses of the Hohenzollern, Habsburg and Ottoman empires.

By 1920, Wilson was a tragic failure, mocked by ex-allies and reviled by former enemies for having dishonored his own 14 Points.

Jimmy Carter declared in 1977 that "we have gotten over our inordinate fear of communism that caused us to embrace any dictator who shared in that fear." So, we undermined Nicaragua's Anastasio Somoza and the Shah, and got the Sandinistas and the Ayatollah Khomeini.

As for Barack, he behaves on the world stage like some Ivy League kid ashamed of the people he came from, letting one and all on campus know that he is nothing like his benighted family with its sordid history.

In Cairo, he confessed that America had a hand in dumping over the regime in Iran in 1953. He did not mention that the United States forced the retreat of Joseph Stalin's army from Iran in 1946.

For the 100th time, he declared, "I have unequivocally prohibited the use of torture by the United States, and I have ordered the prison at Guantanamo Bay closed by early next year."

Is Obama unaware that Egypt, Turkey and Saudi Arabia run prisons that make Guantanamo look like The Breakers at Palm Beach?

How many Guantanamo inmates plead to be sent home to Muslim countries?

In Trinidad, Obama sat for 55 minutes enduring Daniel Ortega's diatribe against the United States for mistreatment of Castro's Cuba and for the Bay of Pigs. Obama protested that he could not be held responsible for something that happened the year he was born.

Why could not he say to Ortega: "We also intervened in the Dominican Republic in 1965 to block a communist takeover, and in Grenada in 1983. The only problem with the Bay of Pigs is that we should have done it right and removed the odious Cuban dictatorship, and put Fidel, Raul and Che up against that same wall where so many patriots perished and spared the Cuban people 50 years of tyranny and the prostitution of their island into a base camp for the greatest despotism of the 20th century."

What is the matter with Obama that he cannot defend our Cold War conduct and Cold War presidents like Ike and JFK?

Answer: Obama cannot, because at heart he buys into the anti-American narrative that ours is a deplorable history — of genocide against the Indians, of slavery and segregation, of robbing Mexicans of their land and of disrespecting our Latin neighbors.

Obama is determined to make the requisite apologies to show the world he does not condone the sins our fathers committed.

Thus, as Nile Gardiner of the Heritage Foundation has cataloged, Obama has apologized to Europe for our having "shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive." He apologized to Latin America for our having been "disengaged and at times ...

sought to dictate."

He told the Turks that we are "working through our own darker periods in our history. ... Our nation still struggles with the legacy of slavery and segregation, the past treatment of Native Americans."

Obama, however, did not ask the Turks to confess to their own "darker periods," which might have taken some time.

Obama is the anti-Reagan. Where Reagan ever spoke of the greatness and glory of America, her history and heroes, her capacity to make the world all over again, Obama is like a dismal parson, forever reminding us — and everyone within earshot — of our own and our fathers' sins.

Obama is not only demoralizing Middle America, he is driving away the God-and-country patriots who are sick of hearing this rot from professors and journalists, and prefer not to hear it from their president. He is ceding moral high ground to regimes and nations that do not deserve it.

If Obama believes he can build himself up by tearing America down, he is mistaken. Cynical foreigners will view it with snickering contempt, patriotic Americans with disgust. What kind of leader is it who talks down his own country on foreign soil?

America's performance in the Cold War was hardly flawless. But does anyone deny that we were on the right side, that the Soviet Empire and Mao's China and communist Vietnam and Castro's Cuba were on the side of tyranny — and that the neutrals were by and large irrelevant or worse in that great cause?

A nation is an extended family. While families fight and quarrel, often bitterly, you do not take the family quarrel outside the family.

You don't hang the family's dirty linen on the communal clothesline.

Obama, however — like some Hollywood actress seeking sympathy and public approbation with her tell-all biography detailing how she was abused by her father — trolls for popularity with America's adversaries by reciting for the benefit of the world all the sins his country has allegedly committed.

When did this become the duty of the president of the United States?

Patrick Buchanan is the author of the new book "Churchill, Hitler and 'The Unnecessary War." To find out more about Patrick Buchanan, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
Reading this column one might think Pres. Obama's audiences have been learning from him about some of the regrettable things the US has done in their countries. Of course, they know about those actions. All they learn from Pres. Obama is that he deplores those actions, as most of them do.
If a Turkish leader went to Armenia and apologize for the massacre, no doubt cynical foreigners would view it with snickering contempt, patriotic Turks with disgust, to use Mr. Buchanan's words, but decent Turks and noncynical foreigners would regard it as an appropriate gesture.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Peter Ungar
Tue Jun 9, 2009 10:49 AM
Sir;...So you think the Sha of Iran and Samosa were in some senses good for America even while they oppressed their people and sowed hatred for us as the devils who propped them up, and armed them against their own??? We can live with the failures of tyranny better than we can live with our own successes which engender and continue to engender indignation and hatred through out the world...You some times exceed yourself in proving to be a little, narrow minded bigot...I do not expect any reform from you; but if you could valve your brain so only about 5% of your thoughts reached your mouth you might sound intelligent...
Comment: #2
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Thu Jun 11, 2009 5:49 AM
Re: Peter Ungar;...Sir,.. The actions of Mr. Wilson made it more morally difficult for the United States to engage in empire building or to support England and others in that activity... It still occured... We still had our Bannana republics, but for all the good he tried to do, Mr. Wilson is hated as a visionary and a failure...Empire is always an expensive proposition, and one the people back home must pay for to have, because in modern terms, if we should bleed the people of our empire today as was done in the past, the moral outcry would be defening...It is for that reason that we love oil... We can bleed people of their rights and resources without ever touching them with a lash...We just hire a government, and give them guns, and tell the world they are sovereign, and take all the country will give, and leave them no better off than before...For all the carving up of the world after the first great war, all they ever did was cut themselves another great war....And all emperial powers met that next war more broke, more played out, and more dilapidated than before... What Mr. Buchanan suggests is that we should have supported more imperial nonsense, and dug in ourselves...Since it is so often the Irish who have suffered and died for the British empire, much as the Armenians suffered and died for the long held empires of Czar, and Turks; it is indeed a strange proposition he puts forth...Empires are costly, and they destroy the nations from which they spring...And those countries, to have empire, must first give up the moral superiority that no nation should be without...Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #3
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Thu Jun 11, 2009 6:15 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Pat Buchanan
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 15 Feb 2012

7 Jul 2009 Dumbing-Down the U.S. Navy

12 Apr 2011 Was Obama Stampeded Into War?

26 Mar 2010 Bibi's Hollow Victory